PAPER C
FIRE AND PUBLIC SAFETY SELECT COMMITTEE – 20 SEPTEMBER 2004
QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT REPORT – QUARTER 1 2004-05
REPORT OF THE PORTFOLIO HOLDER FOR FIRE, EMERGENCY PLANNING AND
CONSUMER PROTECTION
REASON FOR SELECT
COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION
This Quarterly Performance Management Report is for
the period 1st April to 30th June 2004 and is for the
Fire, Emergency Planning and Consumer Protection portfolio. This first report
for 2004-05 was presented to the Council’s Executive on the 25th
August 2004.
ACTION REQUIRED BY THE SELECT COMMITTEE
|
BACKGROUND
1.
This
Report for quarter 1 summarises performance for the responsibilities under the
Portfolio Holder Fire, Emergency Planning and Consumer Protection for the
quarter ended 30th June 2004. The report format has been revised and now
includes a risk assessment for the new and existing Areas to Watch highlighted
in the report; and a revised basket of key performance indicators, with
quarterly target profiles.
2. The results of the Best Value Performance Indicator
User Satisfaction Survey 2003 is attached as Appendix 2 to this report. In
2000/01, the Government specified a number of Best Value Performance Indicators
(BVPIs) that required local authorities to survey local people. It was agreed
that these user satisfaction surveys, to inform the production of the indicator
information, be conducted on a three yearly cycle. On that basis, the second
survey took place in autumn 2003. The performance data is factual and reports
the outturn for 2003/2004 performance indicators as per the ODPM’s requirements
and is considered central to the authority’s performance management
arrangements.
3.
Following
a contract tendering process an independent market research company, Questions
Answered, undertook to consult on behalf of the Council to ensure complete
objectivity of results. This took the form of a postal survey, which took place
in
the autumn of 2003, and involved randomly
selecting 3,300 residents to be surveyed.
The result of this was an overall return of 1,192 responses.
4. Feedback from the previous Fire, Emergency Planning and
Consumer Protection Select Committee when the Quarterly Performance Management
Report for quarter 4 was presented have been undertaken and a revised basket of
performance indicators has been developed in consultation with the Heads of
Service.
5. Significant progress has been made throughout the year on
targets and activities within the Portfolio Holder’s responsibilities
including:
·
Investors
in People accreditation for Consumer Protection Service
·
Safer
Communities Team including the Drug Action Team has been established
·
Performance
Indicator 1 (page-5) Domestic burglaries this quarter per 1,000 households has
shown improved performance and the quarterly target has been met
·
Fire
and Rescue Performance Indicators 2-4 (page-5) have all achieved their
quarterly targets
·
Both
Local Public Service Agreement (PSA) targets 8 and 9 (page-7) have achieved
their quarterly targets
6. However, there are concerns on the following:
Areas to Watch:
· The retention of Fire Control
Staff during the transitional period (page-4).
This has been risk scored as 16, the highest risk attainable
·
Fire
Service pay and conditions agreement (page-4).
This has been risk scored 12
·
Industrial
action resulting from national negotiations on pay and conditions (page-4) has
also been risk scored 12
Performance Indicators:
·
Two
of the four indicators relating to Consumer Protection (page-6) Indicator 5a
score against a checklist of enforcement best practice for Environmental Health
is 30% below the annual target and the Number of Trading Standards Inspections
this quarter undertaken in the quarter was below the target by 35 inspections
User Satisfaction Survey
Results (2003)
·
The
overall satisfaction with the Fire Service has shown a fall from 82% in 2000-01
to 67% in 2003-04, which is a surprising
statistic when the report also says that no-one was dissatisfied with the
service and that only 3% of the people surveyed had actually used the service
RELEVANT PLANS, POLICIES,
STRATEGIES AND PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Best
Value Performance Plan 2003-04
Annual
Action Statement 2004-05
Quarterly
Performance Management Report quarter 1 2004-05
CONSULTATION PROCESS
Heads of Service and their staff have supplied the information within
the Quarterly Performance Management Report, with Directors being fully
consulted on the content.
External consultation has
not been necessary for this report, with the exception of the User Satisfaction
Survey, as it is concerned with internal financial and management arrangements.
FINANCIAL, LEGAL, CRIME
AND DISORDER IMPLICATIONS
The report itself does not have any financial
implications. However, if Members make decisions regarding services identified
in this report, these may have financial implications.
It is a requirement of the Local Government Act
1999 to deliver best value in service delivery of which an effective
performance management system is a significant part.
APPENDICES ATTACHED
Appendix
1 Quarterly Performance Management Report 1 2004-05
Appendix
2 and 2a BVPI User Satisfaction Survey (2003)
BACKGROUND PAPERS USED IN
THE PREPARATION OF THIS REPORT
Annual Action Statement
2003/04
Comprehensive Performance
Assessment Action Plan
Quarterly Performance
Management Reports 1 2004-05 and 1, 2, 3 and 4 2003-04
Contact Point : Heidi
Marshall, Principal Policy Officer, 823250 [email protected]
CLLR DAVID KNOWLES
Portfolio Holder for Fire, Emergency Planning and Consumer Protection