MINUTES OF A
MEETING OF THE CHILDREN’S SERVICES SELECT COMMITTEE HELD AT COUNTY HALL, NEWPORT, ISLE OF
WIGHT ON TUESDAY, 21 APRIL 2005 COMMENCING AT 9.30 AM
Present :
Mr J F Howe
(Chairman), Mrs B D Clough, Mr C R Hancock,
Mr P D Joyce, Mr R G Mazillius, Mrs L J
Peacey-Wilcox, Mr K Pearson, Mr I R Stephens
Co-opted (voting) :
Sister Patricia, Mr A Wood
Portfolio Holder :
Mrs J L Wareham
Also present (non-voting) :
Mrs E Oulton, Mr R C Richards, Mr R A Sutton
62.
MINUTES
The Minutes of the meeting held on 17 March 2005 were confirmed.
63.
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
There were no declarations made at this stage.
64.
FORWARD
PLAN
The Head of Select Committee and Review Team indicated that the
only item of relevance to the Select Committee that he was aware of related school
organisation which was to be considered by the Executive on 1 June 2005.
65.
QUARTERLY
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT REPORT – QUARTER 2 2004-05
The Select Committee was reminded that consideration of the
Quarterly Performance Management Report for the period 1 October to 31 December
2004 had been deferred from the previous meeting.
A new area to watch related to progress being made with cluster
working. It was noted that there was to be a conference involving Heads and the
LEA on 17 May 2005. This was part of the ongoing evaluation of the
effectiveness of cluster working and sharing of best practice.
Members raised concerns over the educational performance of looked
after children. Officers indicated that figures were volatile due to the size
of the cohort and there was a need to aware that this category included a
number of children with complex learning and behaviour difficulties. The Head
of Pupil Services suggested that information could be included in the QPMR
report so to enable members to have an outline profile of the children
involved. There was also a need for an added value indicator so that attainment
across a wide range of social, academic and vocational skills could be clearly
demonstrated.
The Select Committee was advised that the 2005 indicative target
ranges for each High School had been agreed for GCSE results. Based on the Key
Stage results of the cohort concerned this should give a minimum of 52% 5 A*-C
and maximum of 60%.
Members were pleased to note that the implementation of Extended
School status on the Island had been praised by the DfES and been highlighted
as best practice in the South East region.
The Education Service had also retained its 2 star rating with ongoing
evidence of further improvements.
The Portfolio Holder referred to the establishment of a Corporate
Parenting Panel. This was to meet on 3 May 2005 and it was proposed that up to
6 members would serve on it.
ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY THE HEAD OF CHILDREN’S SERVICES
(a)
A briefing
paper be sent to members of the Select Committee on the Council’s performance
on the average gross weekly expenditure overall for Looked after Children
Service in foster or residential care and the spilt for each.
(b)
The
inclusion of anonymous profiles of Looked After Children be investigated so
that a better understanding of their attainments can be achieved.
ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY THE HEAD OF DEMOCRATIC AND LEGAL SERVICES
Up to six members
be appointed to serve on the Corporate Parenting Panel.
66.
TEACHER
EXIT SURVEY
The Chairman welcomed Mr David Porter, a representative of the IW
Teachers Council, to the meeting for this item.
The Select Committee was informed that this matter had been placed
on the agenda at the request of Councillor Joyce. The Teacher Exit Survey had
been considered by the IW Teachers Council at its meeting on 4 March 2005.
Mr Porter explained the background to the survey, which was
administered by the Education Personnel Section. This followed on from a survey
undertaken in 2001 on teacher recruitment and retention. The results of the
latest survey highlighted that the main cause given by teachers leaving was due
to relationship problems with Heads, Senior Management, line managers or
colleagues. However many of the moves were made to other island schools.
Workloads was another major reason given for leaving. Mr Porter
referred to the Health and Safety Improvement notice served upon the Council
and the application of a stress filter tool. He believed that schools should
have taken action on this by 31 March 2005. Although this matter had been
raised by Health and Safety Liaison Officers in November 2004 it was not until
23 March 2005 that Heads had been requested to commence to appropriate
processes. Mr Porter believed that health and safety at schools was also a
responsibility of the LEA. He also acknowledged that School Governing Bodies
could be more effective and at times there appeared to be a lack of
communication between relevant parties.
Mr Porter raised issues relating to class size and pupil behaviour
and difficulties in staff being released from teaching duties to attend
training. The use of supply staff to
cover for absence due to stress related illness was a frequent occurrence. He also indicated the wish of the IW
Teachers Council to have more direct contact with elected members at such
meetings.
The Select Committee was advised by the Head of Planning and
Resources that there were some limitations to the data arising from the survey.
All Governing Bodies should have a policy on stress management either by
adopting the Council’s own policy or basing it on this. The Health and Safety
Improvement notice primarily related to the provision of a training package for
senior managers. The stress filter tool was one element of a range of issue
covered.
It was proposed that assistance would be offered to the IW
Teachers Council in compiling the questions for the next survey. This would
help in developing the survey so that the data produced could be more focussed.
ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY THE HEAD OF SELECT COMMITTEE AND REVIEW TEAM
A copy of the report considered by the Select Committee be sent to
all Heads and Chairs of Governing Bodies and that they be advised that the
survey will be revisited by the IW Teachers Council and the LEA so to improve
the qualitative information received when the next survey is undertaken.
67.
SEN TASK
GROUP
The Select Committee received a copy of the specialist legal
advice sought from David Ruebain of Levenes following the five questions agreed
at the meeting on 7 December 2004. The Chairman of the SEN Task Group, Mr
Joyce, was invited to update members on its work. He indicated that the Task Group had concentrated its efforts on
the statementing process. The advice given on the content of advice received
from partners involved in the process had been useful. Some further information
was being sought by Mr Joyce in relation to this which would enable the Task
Group to formulate appropriate recommendations to the Portfolio Holder.
ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY THE HEAD OF SELECT COMMITTEE AND REVIEW TEAM
A meeting of the SEN Task Group be held following receipt of the
required information so that its views of the statementing process can be
reported back to the Select Committee.
68.
WORK OF
THE SELECT COMMITTEE
The Chairman invited Mr Richard Wright a reporter from the IW
County Press to comment on the Select Committee process. Mr Wright indicated
that he would welcome the opportunity to work more closely with Select
Committees following the elections. The press could play a role in helping to
engage the public in a better understanding of the process and involvement in
some of the topics being discussed.
ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY THE HEAD OF SELECT COMMITTEE AND REVIEW TEAM
The press be invited to the member induction session on overview
and scrutiny so that they can comment on the role that it can play.
69.
MEMBERS’
QUESTION TIME
Mr C R Hancock raised concerns expressed by the IW
Youth Justice Forum on the lack of provision for young people during school
holidays. The Strategic Director
referred to proposed changes that may be made nationally to the framework of
youth service and the link with the establishment of Children’s Trusts. The
Portfolio Holder also gave an update on the provision of Children’s Centres.
CHAIRMAN