PAPER D
Committee: SCRUTINY
COMMITTEE
Date: 24 NOVEMBER
2005
Title: WORK PROGRAMME
REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT
CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND MONITORING OFFICER
___________________________________________________________________
ACTION REQUIRED BY THE
SCRUTINY COMMITTEE
To agree:
(i) A
methodology for determining future work programmes
(ii) Priorities
for the Committee’s first work programme
PURPOSE
The Schools Forum’s
membership includes representatives of: Headteachers and Governors from each
sector of education; Diocesan Authorities and stakeholder groups such as Early
Years. The Forum considers all financial matters as they affect the Education
budget and advises the Council on the priorities for expenditure within the
Schools Block. This advice would be offered normally in the context of the
overall settlement for education. Members will be aware that the FSS for the
Council as a whole has been delayed until 9 December (approx). The Chair of the
Forum may feel able to give general guidance to members but the full impact of
the EFSS for 2005-6 will not be discussed by the Schools Forum until its
re-arranged meeting of 16 December. The work of the Forum for the past year is
the subject of the report which can be found at Appendix 1.
1. To produce a Scrutiny Committee
work plan for the next 6 months, using prioritisation criteria to determine
each potential enquiry’s level of importance.
2. Below are proposed criteria for
prioritising topics of enquiry for scrutiny, which are weighted accorded to
importance. Each enquiry should be
considered separately, and the score for each enquiry should be totalled and
the enquiries ranked according to score.
3.
This
methodology should not be seen as overly prescriptive, nor as a forensic tool –
but as a way of publicly debating and ranking priorities for the committee in a
consistent and rational way. It builds on tools developed by the Improvement
and Development Agency (the IDeA).
4. If the tool, when applied, gives
results which do not reflect other assessments of the priorities of the Island,
and of the Council, it should be revisited.
5. This report was originally submitted to
the Scrutiny Committee on 18 July 2005. The item was deferred to a special
meeting in August 2005 which, due to changing circumstances surrounding the
membership of the Committee, did not take place. This is therefore the first
opportunity that members will have had of determining the Committee’s future
workplan.
Criteria
|
Weighting |
Assessment |
Significant
contribution to Community Strategy Objective |
3 |
|
Significant
contribution to Corporate Plan Objective |
3 |
|
Significant underperformance
Identified from QPMR |
3 |
|
Significant/persistent
issue from budget monitoring reports |
3 |
|
New, increasing or
long term static risk on Corporate Risk Register |
3 |
|
Identified as
source of concern from customer feedback |
2 |
|
Identified by Town/Parish
Council(s) |
2 |
|
Government priority |
2 |
|
Identified via
media attention – local |
1 |
|
Identified via
media attention – national |
1 |
|
Highlighted by
local members, MP, or other community representative |
1 |
|
Identified by
Scrutiny Committee member(s) |
1 |
|
Request of Cabinet
Member |
1 |
|
Counter Indicators
|
|
|
Planned or recent
internal/external audit activity |
-5 |
|
Planned or recent
related Policy Commission enquiry |
-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
5.
POTENTIAL
ENQUIRIES
5.1
Outstanding items from
previous administration
Appendix 1 shows all the
outstanding items from the previous administration and suggests as to where
each item could be directed. The below
items are those which appear to be best suited to attention from the Scrutiny
Committee:
Proposed enquiry
|
Weighted score
|
Property transactions |
0 |
GAGS programme |
6 |
Highway and Bridge
inspections* |
|
Housing benefits |
2 |
Fire Modernisation |
5 |
Local Development Framework |
-1 |
Tourism Development Plan |
-5 |
*
Included in proposed Highway Safety enquiry
5.2
Requests from Cabinet
Proposed
enquiry |
Weighted score |
Supporting People budget |
11 |
5.3
New items for consideration
Proposed
enquiry |
Weighted score |
Formation of a Health Trust |
7 |
School Organisation |
8 |
Highway Safety |
11 |
Budget Process |
9 |
Nb.
In conducting the prioritisation exercise no scores were added in relation to
Local Area Agreement or Aim High.
6.
RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that the Committee adopt the
assessment methodology contained within this report and that the work programme
includes enquiries into:
·
GAGS programme
·
Fire Modernisation
·
Supporting People budget
·
Formation of a Health
Trust
·
School Organisation
·
Highway Safety
·
Budget process
These
lines of enquiry need to be timetabled and resourced. The next meeting of the Scrutiny Committee will receive a draft
work programme.
APPENDICES
Appendix 1 – Former Select
Committees - Outstanding Work Programmes
Contact Point: John
Lawson, Assistant Chief Executive, ( 01983 823203
Email: [email protected]
Contact Point :
Kim Johnson, Head of Planning and Resources, F telephone number: 823410 and e-mail : Kim. [email protected]
Kim
Johnson
JOHN LAWSON
Assistant Chief Executive
and Monitoring Officer