PAPER B
Committee : RESOURCES
SELECT COMMITTEE
Date : 10
APRIL 2002
Title : RELATE
SOLENT - SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT 2002/2005
REPORT OF
THE HEAD OF PAID SERVICE
1.
SUMMARY
1.1_
In past
years, the Council has made central grant funding available on an annual basis
to Relate in support of their services on the Island, and continues to do so.
Since the formation of Relate Solent, whereby the Island operation is now
managed from Southampton, it seems appropriate that a more detailed and formal
agreement should now be drawn up setting out what services and facilities will
be provided in return for the funding provided. This report presents such an
agreement for members= consideration which is attached at Annexe A.
2.
BACKGROUND
2.1 Over recent years the amount available
for central grant funding has dwindled to the extent that very few
organisations currently benefit and this is one of the issues being addressed
by the Grants Task Group. Only one of these organisations, Relate, is not
subject to a service level agreement and still makes annual bids to the council
for grant aid. There are disadvantages to this annual bid cycle, in that an
organisation=s business or project planning is more
difficult if funding remains short term and uncertain, and where funding
decisions cannot be made well in advance of the financial year in which they
are to be spent. A term Service Level Agreement, typically over a three year
period, allows for greater stability and for clear requirements for the service
to be negotiated, agreed and monitored, allowing an organisation to provide
better value for the Council=s money.
2.2 Relate Solent was formed in 1999 as a
result of a merger between Relate I.W. and Relate Southampton. The I.W.
operation was re-evaluated and restructured during 2000 and 2001, and this
raised a number of concerns regarding the way in which services were being
offered to Island clients. A series of meetings have taken place, facilitated
by the Rural Community Council, and the issues raised have been discussed at
length at the CommunityLink Committee. These activities have resulted in
proposals for three options for the future:
3.
OPTIONS
3.1 Option 1. Continuation of current level of service.
The basic
counselling and psychosexual therapy service is maintained at a standstill
grant with only inflationary uplifts. The grant required for 2002 at a
standstill rate, and in conjunction with an application submitted to the Social
Services & Housing Directorate for a renewal of an annual grant in the sum
of ,4,490 for 2002/03, is ,9000. This will allow Relate to continue to provide approximately 600
hours of counselling per annum across Newport, Ryde and Freshwater.
3.2 Option
2. Recruitment of additional
counsellor giving an additional 100 counselling hours in the first year,
and a further venue offering increased accessibility.
Recruitment
of an additional counsellor will necessitate an increase in the grant of ,2,100 over two years. This will
allow Relate to provide additional hours in the venues currently used,
increasing counselling hours to 700 during 2002/03.
Coupled with this is the opportunity to offer the service at an
additional venue on the Island, possibly in the southeast. An additional venue will increase the accessibility
of the service and allow the current workforce to increase the number of hours
they work, if they so wish.
The cost of this option includes an element for rental of premises for
an additional venue which will be ongoing, but may be slightly offset by an
anticipated increase in client income.
This option would ensure
the provision of an education and training service on the Island, including
open access courses such as >New Life New Challenge= and >Taking Charge of Your
Life=. Anger Management and Stress Management
courses could also be provided for the general public or tailor-made to
organisations= requirements. Other bespoke training could be arranged,
particularly courses for schools, colleges and prisons, etc.
The cost of providing
this service is ,5,950 over three years but it is anticipated that income
achieved by the end of the three years will enable this to be a self-financing
service on an ongoing basis.
The central grant aid
required for each of these three options is set out below.
4.
FINANCIAL
IMPLICATIONS
4.1 The Council=s budget for 2002/03 includes central grant
provision for funding Option 1. There is no budget provision for the funding of
the extra sums required to satisfy Options 2 or 3, and, if approved, these
amounts would have to be found from contingencies.
Relate Solent |
Central Grant Funding |
||
2002/03 |
2003/04 |
2004/05 |
|
Option 1. |
,4,510 |
,4,510* |
,4,510* |
Option 2. |
,5,760 |
,7,010* |
,7,010* |
Option 3. |
,7,760 |
,7,760* |
,7,760* |
*plus adjustment for inflation
4.2 Application
has been submitted to the Social Services & Housing Directorate for a
renewal of an annual grant in the sum of ,4,490 for
2002/03. Central
Funding is complementary to Social Services Directorate Funding in ensuring
provision of the overall service on the Island.
RECOMMENDATION That a recommendation be made to the Executive to
adopt Option 1. |
Contact Point : Peter
Greenwood, F 3697
ALAN KAYE
Head of Paid
Service