PAPER H

 

Committee :     SOCIAL SERVICES, HOUSING AND BENEFITS SELECT COMMITTEE       

 

Date :               14 JANUARY 2003

 

Title :               FAIRER CHARGING POLICY FOR NON RESIDENTIAL SOCIAL CARE SERVICES – CONSULTATION PROPOSALS

 

REPORT OF THE ACTING STRATEGIC DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL SERVICES AND HOUSING

 

 

1.                  SUMMARY/PURPOSE

 

This report is prepared in response to the Fairer Charging Policies for Home Care and other non-residential Social Services’ Guidance issued by the Department of Health. Elected members will recall the paper presented to this committee on 6 November 2002 in which it was noted that various charging options would be placed before them in order to establish a new charging policy effective from April 2003.

 

This paper outlines the Council’s draft proposals, and sets out the consultative framework that has to be applied before the Policy is approved. It also makes the following recommendations:

 

1.      To approve the draft policy, subject to consultation

2.      To approve the consultative questionnaire

 

2.                  BACKGROUND

 

2.1       The Directorate is currently completing its review of all users’ charges in line with the statutory guidance referred to in the previous report presented to this committee. The data gathered from this is being used to assist the consultation process that is necessary in order to formulate a new policy from April 2003.

 

2.2       The Department of Health’s “Fairer Charging” guidance for non-residential services has to be fully effective from 1 April 2003. In summary, the guidance requires local authorities to:

 

·         Charge people according to their ability to pay

·         Not charge people whose income is below “basic” Income Support + 25%

·         Offset appropriate disability-related costs from any disability benefits included in the assessment

·         Not charge against earnings or low income benefits linked to earnings such as Working Families Tax Credit

·         Give full welfare rights advice to the user and / or carer

 

·         Introduce an integrated assessment for services – one charge for a package of services

·         Set charges which are a proportion of the real cost of service provision

·         Introduce the scheme after consultation with stakeholders

 

2.3       Fairer Charging brings no additional central government resources. The Fairer Charging guidance suggests that any loss of income or increased administrative cost should be met by increasing users income through benefits advice and support when making a claim. This would have the effect of increasing users’ charges.

           

 

            The Council’s draft response to the government’s requirements is set out in Appendix A.

 

            The guidance is both detailed and far-reaching in its effect on users charges. To assist elected members in considering its implications the main areas for consideration in this report have been numbered in conjunction with the Council’s draft proposals and set out as follows:

 

            Services Currently Charged For

            Who Can Be Charged?

            How Much Can Be Charged?

            Consultation Proposals

 

Details of the effect of these, and other changes required by the guidance, are set out in the Commentary Paper (Appendix B).

 

2.4       Services Currently Charged For

 

            Elected members are asked to note that the current charging policy incorporates:

 

            Home Care

            Day Care

            Day Care – Meals

            Meals on Wheels

            Community Alarm (Wightcare)

           

            In addition, from April 2003, a charge will be made for Housing Related Support Services, a report on which was presented to Executive Committee on 3 December 2002.

           

            Please note that the numbers in brackets refer to Appendix A

 

            Consideration has been given to each of the above charges and the principal change set out in the draft proposals is that the flat rate 2-tiered charge for day care be abolished and partly offset by increasing the charge for meals taken in day care establishments (3,4,5). This is considered necessary because the current systems the Council has for assessing and collecting charges does not allow for a “packaged” charge that can vary dependent upon the level of service given.

           

2.5       Who Can Be Charged?

 

The guidance sets out a number of requirements that must be taken into account when undertaking an assessment of a users ability to pay charges. These new assessment rules have been applied in the review of users’ charges that has recently taken place and is effective from 1 October 2002. 288 out of approximately 1200 home care and day care users have been assessed as being exempt from charging under the new guidelines.

 

Elected members are asked to note the requirement that is placed on local authorities to provide a full benefits advice service will have the effect of bringing some of these users back into charging at a later date (12).

 

Some users will be exempt from charging because of the nature of the services they are receiving and these have been acknowledged in the draft policy (2). Furthermore, Fairer Charging guidance is aimed at adult services users but must obviously be applied to children’s services as a minimum. Many children’s services users who receive a home care support service have previously had their charges waived and it is proposed to take the opportunity of these new arrangements to formally apply a waiver to all children’s services charges for home care. This will have a minimal effect on income. Consequently, there is no specific reference to children’s services in the draft policy proposals.

 

2.6       How Much Can Be Charged?

 

Discretion is still available to the Council to set a level of charge for its services but considerations have to be given to the level of service, cost of providing the service and the maximum charge that can be levied. These have all been acknowledged in the draft proposals (1,4,17,7).

 

Once the policy is approved, the levels of charges will have to be calculated in line with the cost of providing the service. This may lead to difficulties if updated provider costs are not known at the time of setting a charge each April (17).

 

A specific issue for elected members to consider is the level of capital, above which it may require users to pay the full cost (13). The current capital limit for home care will have to be increased in line with Charging Regulations (CRAG) but there is no current capital limit for day care and, if the Council wishes to apply a similar level there will be some users (approx 30) who will have their current charge of £6.30 per session (potentially a nil charge from April 2003) increased to an amount in the region of £30. There will inevitably be risk effects to this that may need individual assessment and it is considered more appropriate to introduce a day care charge of £7 to users who have capital above the threshold limit.

 

2.7       Consultation Proposals

 

A draft questionnaire to be sent to users is attached as Appendix C. Consultation with users and stakeholders is a specific requirement of the guidance and the statutory consultative issues are:

 

Discretion to charge or not

Should charges reflect both ability to pay and the level of service

Setting a maximum charge

Allowing expenses for disability to all users

Taking account of savings

 

It is intended to consult:

 

Service Users, Voluntary Groups, Primary Care Trust, Care Providers, Carers Groups etc, etc.

           

3.         FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The Council has recognized the financial impact that Fairer Charging will have and has set aside £200,000 in 02/03 to cover any shortfall in income following the review of users charges that was effective from 1 October 2002, plus £250,000 in 03/04.

 

The exact financial implication is difficult to forecast as it depends upon a number of factors. In addition to considering the policy set out in Appendix A, the Council has yet to set it charge levels for 03/04. However, to assist elected members, the broader financial implications of the introduction of Fairer Charging as set out in the policy (Appendix A) are listed at the end of the commentary (Appendix B). This shows that the Council will receive approximately £283k less than it would otherwise have received.

 

4.         LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

 

Councils are expected to implement this guidance under section 7 of the Local Authority Social Services Act 1970 (Section 1) by the dates given above.

 

 

  1. RECOMMENDATIONS

 

            Members are asked to recommend to the Executive :

 

a)      The approval of the draft proposals, including :

 

i) Abolishing day care charges

                        ii)Waive all charges for children’s services

                        iii)Charge £7 to day care service users with capital above limit          

                        iv)Abolishing charges for intermediate care (up to 6 weeks)

 

                  b)  The Approval of the consultative questionnaire

 

 

 

6.                  BACKGROUND PAPERS

 

Dept of Health’s Local Authority Circular LAC (2001) 32 dated 23 November 2001

 

Dept of Health’s Fairer Charging Policies for Home Care and other non-residential Social Services – Practice Guidance (August 2002)

 

 

Contact Point :     Dawn Cousins,  520600  Ext 2236

 

 

     J DOYLE

Acting Strategic Director of Social Services and Housing