APPENDIX B

 

COMMENTARY ON DRAFT FAIRER CHARGING PROPOSALS

 

1.

Discretion to charge

  • Budgeted income from charging for non residential services amounts to £1,457,454 in 02/03.
  • A sum of £200k has been allowed in this year’s budget to offset the reduced income that will result from the re-assessment of users income that was required by the new guidance from 1/10/02. This budgeted loss of income has been increased to £450k for the full year effect in 03/04.
  • It is anticipated that the loss of income will be reduced over a period of time by specialist staff working with users to increase their income by maximising benefit payments.

2.

Services that may not be charged for

  • Guidance is clear that local authorities cannot charge for these services

3.

Charges have to reflect a “package” of services and cannot be levied independently

  • Previously, the Council levied its charges independently. This practice has had to be reviewed.
  • Other than for “flat rate” charges that are allowed ie meals at home and in day care establishments, all other charges have to be considered on a weekly basis by calculating the amount of service received alongside the users ability to pay. This is administratively complex to apply. For example, detailed consideration will have to be given as how to make a charge to a user who receives a personal home care service alongside a support service provided under the new Supporting People Grant that becomes effective with the withdrawal of Transitional Housing Benefit from April 2003.
  • Current charging systems are having to be reviewed to ensure that users are being charged in line with this requirement
  • In particular, the current charging systems do not allow a “packaged” charge that includes both homecare and day care. Consequently, it is considered necessary to abolish the flat rate charges for day care.

4.

Charges should reflect level of service provided

  • The Council currently relates its home care charges to the level of service provided and the draft proposal is for this to continue.
  • The current charge for day care services is set at a 2 tiered level - £3.60 per session for users on prescribed benefits and £6.30 for others. The charge is also only levied to older people and people with physical disabilities.
  • Many users will be exempt from charging following the assessment of their ability to pay and the cost of assessment and the establishment of an administrative system to make charges to the remaining users would mean additional staff and central support costs in excess of the income to be generated.
  • Consideration should be given to charging a meal cost to all users to minimise the loss of income (see note 3).
  • Consideration should also be given to making a full cost charge to day care users who have savings in excess of the upper limit to bring this service in line with home care (note 13). It is anticipated that this will affect approximately 30 users who would be required to pay up to £30 per session instead of the current charge of £6.30. The risk effect of this would require an individual assessment on the impact of charging.  It is considered more appropriate to introduce a charge of £7 per session to these users.

 

5.

Flat rate charges eg meals at home or in day care

  • The charge for these services can be made without the need for assessment.
  • The introduction of a charge for meals (including refreshments) in a day care establishment was introduced in October 2002 in order to minimise the loss of income following the re-assessment of users’ ability to pay in line with the new guidance.
  • Currently, this charge is applied to all users except learning disabilities.
  • The increase of meal charges in line with the proposal would generate an extra £31k.

6.

Users must be able to retain an amount equivalent to Income Support + 25% before charges can be considered

  • This major change to charging policy was introduced in line with the new guidance from October 2002 following a complete review of all users charges.
  • To ensure that users are charged correctly, it is anticipated that a full review of their ability to pay will have to be undertaken each April alongside the already established review of users in residential care. This will mean that approximately 2000 users will have to be financially re-assessed and will create significant resource issues for financial staff (note 14).

7.

Maximum charge for non residential care

  • The Council is determined to meet the requirement of PAF Indicators C28 : C32 and help people remain in their own home for as long as possible.
  • Setting a maximum charge for a full cost payer at 75% of the cost of basic residential care reflects this commitment.
  • At current charge levels this will mean a charge can be made for up to 20 hours of home care.
  • It would also mean that the majority of home care users that are assessed to pay will only be charged a maximum amount that varies between 4% (band B users) and 30% (band H users) of the full cost of residential care.

8.

War Disability Pensions and War Widows Supplementary Pensions

  • The disregards applicable to these benefits will be fully applied.

9.

Disability Related Benefits

  • The Council currently includes these benefits as income (see also note 11).
  • Fairer Charging guidance gives Councils the option of not including these benefits as income but this would adversely affect the amount of income that is collected.
  • The exact amount of income that would be lost cannot be calculated as income is also dependent upon the levels of service provided but, approximately 500 people were assessed as receiving these benefits during the October 02 review.
  • If the Council decided not to include these benefits as income it would not be required to undertake a separate assessment of disability related expenditure, although guidance suggests that it is still good practice to undertake this work as part of the review of users benefits (note 12).

10.

Disability Related Expenditure

  • The Council was required to assess this expenditure for all users who received more than 10 hours of home care service each week from October 02.
  • This requirement is extended to all users who have their disability related benefits taken in to account in their assessed ability to pay from April 02.
  • Substantial work was undertaken to meet this requirement during the October 02 review and experience has now been gained to enable such expenditure to be assessed fairly and consistently.
  • Details from the recent review indicate that there were approximately 170 users who were not in receipt of disability related benefits.

11.

Higher rates of Attendance Allowance and Disability Living Allowance

  • Attendance Allowance and Disability Living Allowance is paid at a higher rate, if a person has day and night needs, or a lower rate if a person has day or night needs.
  • It has been found to be unfair for a Council to treat as income available for day care sums of Attendance Allowance and Disability Living Allowance paid in respect of night time care.

 

12.

Benefits Advice

  • This is a significant new requirement set out in guidance. 2 extra Visiting Finance Officers have been appointed to support the team carrying out this work and closer working links will be set up with the Dept for Work and Pensions.
  • Evidence gathered from the October 02 review clearly indicates that there are approx 40% of service users who are not claiming their full entitlement of income related benefits.
  • These people will be approached with a view to the Council assisting with any such claims if the user so wishes.
  • A successful claim will result in a re-assessment of charge that will have a positive affect on the Council’s income.

 

13.

Savings and Capital

  • Guidance allows Councils to charge the full cost of services to users who have capital above the limit set out in the Dept of Health Charging for Residential Accommodation Guide (CRAG).
  • The current capital limit for home care is £12000 (£19000 for couples), but there is no capital limit for day care services.
  • The capital limit must be increased to at least £19000 from April 03 and be reviewed each year in line with CRAG.
  • Users who have capital in excess of £11750 will be required to contribute a small amount from their savings towards the cost of their service.
  • Guidance requires the issue of charging full cost to people with savings to be the subject of consultation.

14.

Charges to be reviewed at regular intervals

  • Previously, a 10% random review took place each year for home care service users but this is not acceptable under the new guidance.
  • There will be significant pressures on finance based staff to undertake full reviews of users charges each year (April) and the need to consider temporary resources to carry out this work will have to be evaluated.

15.

Treatment of jointly held (couples) income and savings

  • Currently, all users who are part of a couple are assessed on the basis of the couples’ income.
  • The guidance envisages that Councils will have regard to an individual user’s income, and recommends a “better off” assessment is calculated in the service user’s favour.

16.

Disregard of earnings

  • The Council complied with this guidance when undertaking the October 02 review.

17.

Charges based on actual cost of service and hours of service

  • The maximum charge for home care is currently calculated against an average cost for providing the service and then reduced in line with a banding system that reflects the chargeable income of the user. This means that charges are levied as a contribution towards the cost.
  • Current systems do not allow a charge to be levied against the exact cost of the service and so an averaged contribution towards the maximum charge will have to be made.
  • Guidance does not allow any charge to be greater than the cost of providing that service and so the averaged maximum charge must be lower than the cost of any provider rates.
  • This will create difficulties at the time of setting a charge  each April as new year provider rates are often not known until after 1 April each year.
  • The Council does charge on an hourly basis.

18.

Charges must be applicable to user or carer

  • The Council has always undertaken to charge in line with this requirement.

19.

Services provided by Direct Payments

  • The Council has always undertaken to charge in line with this requirement.

20.

Charges for Intermediate Care

  • Intermediate care services can be provided from both residential and non-residential care settings.
  • Currently, the 2 rehabilitation units at Gouldings and Adelaide are in operation and users pay the minimum charge for residential care (£58.70 per week).
  • There is currently no provision for short term rehabilitation within home care but this is planned to be introduced in 03/04.
  • Consequently, the loss of income at this stage is related to residential care services only and amounts to approximately £30,000.

 

21.

Information to users

  • The Council will have to review all its leaflets about charging and make sure these are explained to users
  • Charges cannot be levied until the user has been informed of the charge in writing.
  • The immediate targets set for the Visiting Finance Team, Financial Assessment Team and other Operational Support staff will be based on undertaking their work as quickly as possible in order to minimise any loss of income resulting from this new guidance directive.
  • The aim is to undertake the assessment in the user’s home and confirm this immediately in writing.

22.

Refusal to pay charge

  • It is accepted that services cannot be withdrawn if a user refuses to pay.
  • A debt recovery system with recourse to the Civil Courts is available.
  • Careful consideration will be given to requesting users to pay the full cost if they refuse to provide information for a charge assessment.

23.

Review of assessed charge and complaints

  • A formal review procedure is being drafted in line with the guidance. This review will consider whether the charging policy has been applied properly and whether there are any particular circumstances that may require special discretion.
  • All users receive a copy of the Social Services Complaints Leaflet at the time of their care assessment.

24.

Information on levels of arrears and costs of collection

  • The guidance is prescriptive in the information it requires local authorities to gather in order to monitor the effectiveness of Fairer Charging.
  • The Council will have to set up systems to meet this requirement.

 

 


 

 

Financial Effect (Approx)

 

INCOME

£’000s

 

 

 

 

 

  1. Re-assessment of existing home care users ability to pay in line with statutory guidance

 

  1. Abolishing charges for Community Laundry Services

            and minor adaptation work (as reported to Select

            Committee on 6 November 2002)

 

  1. Abolishing day care charges for users with capital below threshold level (net of income for meals charges)

 

  1. Increased meals charge for day care users from £2.00 to £2.50

 

  1. Maintaining day care charge for users with capital above threshold level (@ £7 per session)

 

  1. Extend charging for meals to learning disability users, living in the community, who receive day care

 

  1. Effect on income from home care users who have capital above £12000 and will be entitled to an assessment of their ability to pay

 

  1. Abolish charging for users who receive intermediate residential care services

 

  1. Increase meals on wheels charge from £1.70 to £1.80 per meal

 

  1. Extra staffing costs:

 

      2 x Visiting Finance Officers (permanent)

      1 x Visiting Finance Officer (temporary)

      0.5x Welfare Rights Officer (permanent)   }

      1 x  Admin Support (permanent)                }

 

 

 

 

Loss

 

Increase

 

 

126

 

 

16

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Not known

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

48

24

30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

11

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

325

 

42

 

      Net Cost

 

283