PAPER B

 

 

Committee:     Environment and Transport Select Committee

 

Date:               30th October 2002

 

Title                 BUDGET MONITORING REPORT AS AT END OF SEPTEMBER 2002

 

REPORT OF THE STRATEGIC DIRECTOR FOR FINANCE & INFORMATION AND COUNTY TREASURER

 

 

 

SUMMARY / PURPOSE

 

This report sets out the budget and spending position on both revenue and capital for the services within this Committee’s remit, as at the end of September. The figures do not include budgets that are controlled elsewhere than the service concerned. These are monitored by the Committee which bears responsibility for such costs. (For example, Resources Select Committee monitors the building maintenance budget centrally, and building maintenance costs are not therefore shown against individual services in the attached appendix).

 

REVENUE EXPENDITURE

 

The report details gross expenditure, income and net expenditure to date against budget as shown at appendix 1. The expenditure and income has been classified over thirteen distinct categories, each of which may have different spending or income generation characteristics.  For example, the waste management budget has expenditure which accrues fairly evenly through the year, with increased contract payments from November, the anniversary of commencement of the contract. By contrast, the county transport and management and supervision budgets also have expenditure which accrues fairly evenly through the year, but in addition have a considerable requirement for recharges to service budgets and capital budgets which tend to take place in arrears of the expenditure; whereas the car parking service generates a considerable amount of income, an element of which is seasonal.  

 

At this halfway stage of the financial year there are still few significant variances to report. The comments contained in the revenue expenditure table (Appendix 1) are intended to provide a basic summary of the services provided within each heading and reasons for the level of budget activity to date. As can be seen from the totals on Appendix 1, expenditure is beneath target using an assumption of its accruing evenly throughout the financial year. However, given the comments on the appendix it is broadly in line with that which would reasonably be expected. By contrast, income generation is ahead of target and seems certain to exceed the budget by the year end, particularly in specific instances.

 

As members are aware, the Head of Engineering Services has identified an additional budget requirement arising from an improved inspection regime for bridges and structures, which will require some £60,000 in the current year and £40-50,000 per annum thereafter for assessments and inspections, including retaining walls. There is also likely to be a requirement for an additional budget of £60-70,000 for the routine maintenance of bridges, retaining walls and other structures. Methods of identifying an appropriate source of funding for these budget requirements are presently being considered. 

 

CAPITAL EXPENDITURE

 

Expenditure against each scheme is shown at Appendix 2.

 

The budgets shown are those approved for the current financial year, described as 2002-2003 schemes, and those slipped from the previous year, described as 2001-2002 slippage. The current years budget forms a part of the single capital pot, for which expenditure must be completed by 31 March 2003. Last year’s capital settlement was in the form of 2 year supplementary credit approval for which expenditure also has to be completed by 31 March 2003. The total approved budget for the year is in excess of £11.5 million, of which £3.7 million has been spent by the end of September, with a further £2.0 million committed. Within the total approved budget figure there is some £1.9 million for the Military Road project, on which negotiations are still being progressed with prospective contractors. The budget for the project has been in place for some years now, and the net underspend has been carried forward year on year to ensure the maximum amount is available when tenders are received. Consequently, there is flexibility to carry forward any underspend once again, should that prove to be necessary. A report on progress on the Military Road scheme was recently considered by the Executive, with the result that a further report seeking approval for an allocation of budget in anticipation of next year’s LTP Settlement is to be considered by the Council during October.

 

As Members are aware from previous month’s monitoring reports, there is a requirement for a budget of some £250,000 for the emergency bridge works at Coppin’s Bridge. There were also over-allocations of budget on the Newport to Ryde strategic corridor and included in slippage brought forward from the previous year, which required to be managed within the total resources available. This is in accordance with the resolution of the Executive on 26 February 2002 which delegated responsibility for delivery of the full programme to the Portfolio Holder for Transport and the Head of Service, within the broad themes identified and the available finance. A strategy for dealing with these commitments has been agreed with the Head of Service and is now reflected in the figures on Appendix 2. In order that Members are aware of changes as they occur, the original approved budget is still displayed, together with the current revised budget.

 

POLICIES AND STRATEGIES

 

The services included within this report are linked to a number of the Council’s key strategic objectives, specifically Improving health, housing and the quality of life for all; Creating safe and crime-free communities; Improving public transport and the highways infrastructure; and Protecting the Island’s physical environment.

 

CONSULTATION

 

No specific consultation has been undertaken in the production of this report. However, a number of the capital projects and services included within the report will have been the subject of consultation with a range of external agencies and members of the public.

 

CRIME AND DISORDER

 

There are no direct crime and disorder issues arising from the production of this report.

 

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

 

There are no direct implications for performance indicators arising from the production of this report. However, clearly there will be implications for future performance measures and indicators arising from the information contained within the report, specifically any cost based indicators, but also the outcomes arising from the services and projects to which this report refers.

 

Contact Point : Stuart Fraser Φ 823657

 

 

John Pulsford

Strategic Director for Finance and Information and County Treasurer

 

REVENUE EXPENDITURE SUMMARY as at end of September

 


 

Service

Expenditure

Income

Net

 

 

Budget

To date

Budget

To date

Budget

To date

Comment

 

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

 

Management and Supervision including Policy and Strategy

1,274.5

918.8

-148.8

-184.2

1,125.7

734.6

Budget includes Transport Planning, Policy and Strategy and Professional and Engineering Services. Expenditure budget is net of design and supervision fees to be recharged to capital projects

Coast protection, harbours and seafronts

877.1

614.9

-212.7

-112.8

664.4

502.1

Budget on target at this stage of the financial year, including cliff stabilisation works

Waste management and recycling

6,139.1

1,064.1

-7.1

-13.1

6,132.0

1,051.0

Budget includes all aspects of the Integrated Waste Management contract, and also includes the landfill tax budget. IWM contract invoices tend to be some weeks in arrears, hence the apparent budget surplus

Public conveniences and first time sewerage

438.5

171.1

-6.2

-0.3

432.3

170.8

Main budgets are for the contractual cleaning of the public conveniences and operational costs such as rates, water and electricity

Building control

428.3

193.0

-394.8

-241.7

33.5

-48.7

Income presently ahead of target due in part to amounts received last year relating to works not yet started, hence accrued into the current year

Street and beach cleaning

1,350.0

382.0

-0.3

-0.9

1,349.7

381.1

As is the case for the waste management and recycling budgets, street cleansing invoices in particular tend to be some weeks in arrears, hence the apparent budget surplus

Highway maintenance

1,839.9

761.5

-33.5

-32.4

1,806.4

729.1

Budget on target at this stage of the financial year


 

REVENUE EXPENDITURE SUMMARY as at end of September

 

 

Service

Expenditure

 

Income

Net

 

 

Budget

To date

Budget

To date

Budget

To date

Comment

 

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

 

Traffic management and road safety

663.6

455.5

-14.0

-12.0

649.6

443.5

Budget on target to date, including cliff stabilisation works linked to highway safety

Street Lighting

627.7

236.7

-10.0

-14.5

617.7

222.2

Budget covers all aspects of the street lighting service, including power, planned maintenance and routine maintenance. On target

County Transport

432.6

1,057.9

-294.2

-105.6

138.4

952.3

Budget includes operational costs of Wightbus, Home to School Transport and the Council’s vehicles and plant prior to their reallocation to service areas. The budgets shown are net of recharges to service user budgets, however no recharges have taken place to date, hence the current overspend shown

Public Transport including Cowes Floating Bridge

1,567.5

642.6

-578.1

-301.0

989.4

341.6

This budget contains the costs of subsidised local bus services, Rural Bus Grant Services and concessionary fares schemes, as well as the operation of the Cowes Floating Bridge. Income is mainly from the Floating Bridge and the Rural Bus Grant

Car Parking

614.7

411.0

-2,118.3

-1,649.1

-1,503.6

-1,238.1

The main focus of this budget tends to be on income generation because of its relative significance and the impact it can have on the delivery of other service areas e.g. traffic management and public transport. Income is accruing well to date, although a significant proportion is seasonal

Environmental Initiatives including Agenda 21

159.1

76.0

-95.7

-15.8

63.4

60.2

This budget includes the Coastal Visitors Centre and associated projects as well as the Agenda 21 budget. Much of the income relates to project budgets for which recharges have yet to take place

Totals

16,412.6

6,985.1

-3,913.7

-2,683.4

12,498.9

4,301.7

Percentage of year elapsed to date   – 50.0%

Percentage net budget spent to date – 34.4%