PAPER B
Purpose: For Decision
Committee: REGULATORY
APPEALS COMMITTEE
Date: 28
FEBRUARY 2003
Title: TREE
PRESERVATION ORDER NO. 10, 2002 - HARBOUR STRAND AND BEMBRIDGE SAILING CLUB,
EMBANKMENT ROAD, BEMBRIDGE
REPORT OF
THE STRATEGIC DIRECTOR OF CORPORATE AND ENVIRONMENT SERVICES
SUMMARY
The trees are within Harbour Strand,
and trees and wood within and around the land used as a car park by Bembridge
Sailing Club. A TPO was made on 3rd
July 2002. An objection has been received. If the Order is to be confirmed this
ideally should have been done by 2nd January 2003.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Confirm TPO / 2002 / 10 with modifications.
2. Remake TPO / 2002 / 10 as a new TPO with the same
modifications
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
As with any TPO, compensation could
be claimed by an applicant if consent to remove trees or for works to the trees
were refused, and the refusal resulted in loss or damage.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS
Removal of the trees and wood would
be a loss for the local landscape.
BACKGROUND
Making of Order
Firstly, trees at Harbour Strand
were believed to be under threat. A condition requiring the retention of trees
was attached to the planning permission granted for Harbour Strand on 23rd
January 1970. However no Tree
Preservation Order was made at that time, although Central Government guidance
states that local authorities should not use planning conditions for long-term
protection of trees, when TPOs are designed for that purpose.
In February 2002 the Tree and
Landscape Officer investigated reports that a tree had been removed at Harbour
Strand. This tree was not shown on the layout plan included within the planning
application, and so it was presumed that no offence had taken place.
Secondly, trees on the adjoining
site used as a car park by Bembridge Sailing Club were also perceived to be
under threat. On 20th April 2002 a planning application was
registered for a development which might have involved the loss of trees.
An Order was therefore made on 3rd
July 2002 to protect 5 trees within the Harbour Strand site, and a wood and an
area of trees within the Bembridge Sailing Club site. The trees were viewed
from roads and public footpaths surrounding the site, which meant that the
precise location of trees within the Bembridge Sailing Club car park could not
be surveyed in detail, and so they were protected by an Area.
The grounds for making the Order
were "the trees and wood are of high present and future amenity value and
are visible from Embankment Road, Harbour Strand, public footpaths BB1, BB2 and
BB19 and from across Bembridge Harbour from St Helen's Duver. The wood is also
important as a wildlife habitat, as it forms a link to Knowles Copse."
Objection
An letter was received on 29th July
from the landowner of the land used as Bembridge Sailing Club=s car park,
with 3 reasons given for objection: AThe
Bembridge Harbour Improvement Company Limited is a statutory
authority/undertaker@ and the TPO
would Ainterfere
with its obligations@; Athere are no
trees in the area A1"; Aexcept for
the location of a turkey oak and a sycamore area W1 does not contain any trees
of merit ... not under any circumstances eligible to be classified as a wood@.
Detailed site survey
The Tree & Landscape Officer
visited the site on 9th July 2002 with the agent for the planning
application, and made a more detailed survey of the trees, so that individual
trees could be protected instead of being part of an Area when and if the Order
was confirmed.
Comments on objections
The Tree and Landscape Officer wrote
back on 7th August, responding to the points raised by the owner's objection
letter, and asked if these comments had answered their objections.
The following is taken from that letter:
AThe
existence of a Tree Preservation Order does not prevent an owner or occupier
from carrying out necessary works or statutory duties. You will see in section 5, paragraph (1)(a)
of the Order that works are exempt if they are:
"... by
or at the request of a statutory
undertaker, where the land on which the tree is situated is operational
land of the statutory undertaker and the work is necessary:
(i) in the interests of the safe operation
of the undertaking;
(ii) in connection with the inspection,
repair or renewal of any sewers, mains, pipes, cables or other apparatus of the
statutory undertaker; or
(iii) to enable the statutory undertaker to
carry out development permitted by or under the Town and Country Planning
(General Permitted Development) Order 1995."
and in
section 5, paragraph (2) a statutory undertaker is stated to include "a
person authorised by any enactment to carry on any ... harbour ... undertaking
..."
AThere are
trees within A1, for example the horse chestnut on the Embankment Road
frontage.
AThe Turkey
oak is within A1 not W1. An area of
young woodland is still woodland even if it is not ancient. Woodland is a semi-natural habitat of
self-set trees and associated species.
Such woodland may have a value in the landscape, which is the primary
criterion when making a Tree Preservation Order.@
No reply has
been received.
Planning
application
TCP/16179/C
has since been withdrawn; application TCP/16179/D has been made and granted on
15th January 2003 for closure of vehicle access and amenity area; a
further application TCP/16179/E, similar to TCP/16179/C, was received on 5th
February 2003.
OPTIONS
Confirm or
remake TPO / 2002 / 10 with modifications to exclude A1, except for the Turkey oak
to the south east of 2 Embankment Road (to be protected as an individual tree);
and to reduce the area of W1 to show an accurate boundary.
If the order
is confirmed or remade, it will ensure the continued existence of the trees for
the foreseeable future.
If the order
is not confirmed or remade, the trees might be under threat.
Remaking the
TPO would allow those affected to object to the modified Order.
BACKGROUND
DOCUMENTS
1.
Planning
permission for Harbour Strand granted 23rd January 1970, reference TCP/6556/B.
2.
Planning
application for 1&2 Embankment Road registered 20th April 2002, reference
TCP/16179/C.
3.
Plan
from TPO/2002/10 made 3rd July 2002.
4.
Letter
of objection from landowner, dated 26th July 2002, received 29th July 2002.
5.
Letter
in reply to landowner dated 7th August 2002.
6.
Proposed
modified plan of TPO/2002/10 following site visit on 9th July 2002.
7.
Planning application for 1&2 Embankment Road approved on 15th
January 2003, reference TCP/16179/D.
8.
Planning
application for 1&2 Embankment Road registered 5th February 2003, reference
TCP/16179/E.
M J A FISHER
Strategic Director
Corporate and Environment
Service