MINUTES
OF A MEETING OF THE REGULATORY APPEALS COMMITTEE HELD AT COUNTY HALL,
NEWPORT, ISLE OF WIGHT ON 11 APRIL 2003 COMMENCING AT 10.00 AM
Present :
Mr A J Mundy (Chairman), Mrs T Butchers,
Mr K Pearson
Also
Present (Non
Voting) :
Mrs M J Lloyd, Mr R C
Richards, Mr A A Taylor
21. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
There were no declarations received at this stage.
22.
REPORTS OF THE STRATEGIC
DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENT SERVICES
(a) Registration of New Town or Village Green, Land South East
of Osborne Works, Whippingham Road, East Cowes
The Chairman referred to additional information which had
been received, by the Council, since the report had been circulated with the
agenda, and proposed that consideration of the item be deferred without any
discussion thereon.
RESOLVED :
THAT the item be
deferred.
(b) 55 Fishbourne Lane, Fishbourne, Ryde – Tree Preservation
Order No 37, 2002
The background to the Tree Preservation Order (TPO) covering
a beech and a Monterey Pine on land at 55 Fishbourne Lane, Fishbourne was
reported. Prior to the approval of a
planning application, on 8 October 2002, to develop the site a tree survey had
been undertaken to assess which trees were of value and worthy of retention and
protection. The Tree and Landscape
Officer had designated only 2 trees to be significantly attractive enough and
suitable for protection. A white poplar
would also have been included but due to the location of a sewage pipe, in
close proximity to the boundary, the white poplar had not been included within
the Order, because that species was prone to suckering. The owner had said that Southern Water also
wished to see the Monterey pine removed because of its proximity to the sewage
pipe. Reference was made to
correspondence and telephone conversations between the owner, Southern Water
and the Tree and Landscape Officer, which attempted to clarify the confusion
over whether any tree had been identified by Southern Water as being a potential
cause for damage of their clay pipes and had, therefore, been requested for
removal. It was noted that a response
had now been received from Southern Water with regard to the two trees affected
by the Order and that they did not wish to see the protected trees removed. The
grounds for making the order were that “the trees were of high present and
future amenity value and were visible from Fishbourne Lane and Ashlake Copse
Road. They were also important as a wildlife
habitat, especially for red squirrels and birds.”
RESOLVED :
THAT the Tree Preservation Order 2002/37, covering a beech
and a Monterey pine on land at 55 Fishbourne Lane, Fishbourne, Ryde be
confirmed.
(c) Oaklands Close, Fishbourne – Tree Preservation Order No 29,
2002
The Committee were advised that the TPO, at Oaklands Close,
Fishbourne had been made, as a revision of The Medina Borough Council
(Fishbourne No 1) TPO 1974 Order. This enabled the protection of 11 trees: 9 of
the original oaks, protected by the 1974 order, and 2 birches which acted as
replacements required, as conditions of the consent, to remove 3 oak trees
protected by the original Order. The
grounds for making the Order were “that the trees were of high present and
future amenity value and were visible from Oaklands Close and Elenors
Grove/Kite Hill/Quarr Hill. They were
also important as a wildlife habitat, especially for red squirrels and
birds.” An objection had been received
from the owners, of No 3 Oaklands Close, with regard to one of the replacement
birches, and requesting for the Cordyline australis, which they had already
planted, to act as a replacement. The other replacement tree, at No 2 Oaklands
Close, had still to be planted. Two
letters of representation had been received and a further letter signed by a
number of local residents was circulated to the Committee. Members were also provided with a letter
from the local Councillor expressing his strong support for their
concerns. In discussion, members were
informed that the timescale allowed to facilitate the planting of the
replacement trees would be dependent on the respective growing season.
RESOLVED :
i.
THAT the Tree Preservation
Order 2002/29, be confirmed;
ii.
THAT a Tree Replanting Notice
be served to ensure that T1 birch was planted as a replacement, as required in
the consent letter of 23 September 2002 for the oak which was removed without
consent, at 2 Oaklands Close, Fishbourne;
iii.
THAT a Tree Replanting Notice
be also served to ensure that T2 birch was planted as a replacement for the oak
removed, at 3 Oaklands Close, Fishbourne and to not grant consent for the
cabbage palm, Cordyline australis to be planted in its stead.
(d) St Anne’s, Augusta Road, Ryde – Tree Preservation Order No
26, 2002
Members noted that St Anne’s was within the Ryde
Conservation Area and that consent was, therefore, required for the removal or
to carry out works to any tree bigger that 75mm in diameter. The southern half of the site, including
most of the garden, was also within G4 of the County of the Isle of Wight
(Borough of Ryde) TPO, 1952, which protected “deciduous” trees (reference
TPO/1952/1). The number of trees
protected, nor their positions, were given on the plan or schedule for Group 4,
so the group was, in effect, an area.
The Tree and Landscape Officer circulated an additional
report with regard to the rebuilding of a stone wall within Ryde Conservation
area. Members were referred to the
paper, attached to the agenda, which set out the background to the Order to
preserve two common limes and a holm oak at St Anne’s, Augusta Road, Ryde. The grounds for making the order were that
“the trees were of very high present and future amenity value and were visible
from Augusta Road, which was a private road to which the public have access,
from Ryde Pier, and from the sea including Ryde ferry.” Members noted the correspondence, received
from the landowner’s solicitor, which set out a number of objections and
highlighted the need for the owner to replace an existing wall, which in his
opinion had become dangerous, and found it impossible to do so without the
trees being removed. The correspondence
also referred to a covenant over any tree growing on the property. The owner’s
solicitor had appealed to GOSE against the decision to refuse consent to remove
the two lime trees. However the appeal
had yet to be determined.
The Local Member spoke in support of a site visit in order
for members to establish the problems concerned. Meanwhile, the Tree and
Landscape officer agreed to investigate the terms of the covenant and report
back to a future meeting of the Committee.
RESOLVED :
THAT a site
visit be arranged.
(e) Coburg Court and Cockerell Rise, Victoria Grove, East Cowes
– Tree Preservation Order No 24, 2003
Members were reminded of the TPO for four trees along
Victoria Grove, forming part of an avenue of holm oaks, considered by some, to
be of significance to the East Cowes landscape, which had been deferred from
the meeting, held on 28 February 2003, pending additional engineering and legal
advice by the Council. Further written
engineering comments had not been received because there was, to the Tree and
Landscapes Officer’s knowledge, no engineer employed by the Council to give
advice outside the remit of their specific job. However, desk top studies had been undertaken which revealed that
the site history suggested Coburg Court was built on imported soil, which might
be a possible reason to explain the position which, if confirmed, suggested
that the trees were not the main cause of subsidence. A copy of a letter submitted by the loss adjuster acting on
behalf of the owners of Coburg Court was tabled for consideration. Members noted that if the trees were to
remain it might be the owner’s intention to seek to recover the additional
foundation cost implication from the Council, under the Town and Country
Planning Act 1990.
In discussion, members were of the view that it would be
beneficial to undertake a site visit.
It was also considered important for a detailed engineer’s response to
be obtained to aid consideration of the evidence submitted on behalf of the
owner of Coburg Court.
RESOLVED :
THAT a site
visit be arranged.
23
APPOINTMENT TO INDEPENDENT
APPEAL PANELS
The report of the Strategic Director of Corporate
Services was received apprising members of the process of appointing panel
members and changes, brought about by the Education (Admission Appeal
Arrangements)(England) Regulations 2002, to the composition of Panels dealing
with admissions and exclusions. In
accordance with the Appeal Regulations all Local Education Authorities had a
duty to advertise for suitable lay members every three years. Any appeal panel
constituted to consider an appeal against permanent exclusion must now comprise
of a current head teacher of a maintained school or one who has held that
position within the previous five years.
The pool of panel members had received appropriate
training and could also be used by the Diocesan Education Authorities.
RESOLVED
:
i.
THAT Mr B Mosdell and Mrs E
Pollen be appointed as Members to the pool of members from which independent,
Education Appeal Panels may be drawn;
ii.
THAT the following head
teachers be appointed to the pool of members from which independent Education
Appeal Panels may be drawn to hear appeals against permanent exclusion:
Mr C Avery, Mr G Booth, Mr J Bradshaw, Mrs Y Brannan,
Mr C Gorski, Mrs M Hoather, Mr H Kirby, Mr D Stradling;
iii.
THAT the above persons be appointed as representatives from whom
the Diocesan Education Authorities may also choose to appoint to Appeal Panels
in respect of aided school appeals.
24
RETIREMENT OF MS R ADAMS
The Chairman reported that this was the last meeting of the Committee before Ms Rowan Adams, the Tree and Landscape Officer, retired.
Members paid tribute to Ms Adams and her work for the Authority.
RESOLVED :
THAT the Committee wish Ms Adams good luck in her future employment.
CHAIRMAN