PAPER E


 

FIRE AND PUBLIC SAFETY SELECT COMMITTEE - 15 MARCH 2004

 

SAFER COMMUNITIES

 

REPORT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

REASON FOR SELECT COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION

 

The Select Committee received a report in December 2003 on key priorities for the Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnership.  The Committee asked for information on the proposed changes being planned for the way in which this area of work is managed.  This report fulfils that request.

 

ACTION REQUIRED BY THE SELECT COMMITTEE

 

The Select Committee is asked to note and/or comment on this report.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

There is a Government requirement that local authorities explore opportunities for closer working between Drug Action Teams (DAT) and Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnerships (CDRP).  This wish was originally set out in the Police Reform White Paper in December 2001 but extended by Home Office Guidance last November.  The relevant part of the Circular includes the following:

 

            In Unitary/Metropolitan Authorities, DATs and CDRPs should adopt the most appropriate local arrangements in order to achieve integration.  In these areas, DATs and CDRPs should operate on an aligned basis “as a single partnership”.  This may mean that DATs and CDRPs formally become a single partnership.

 

During the last few months, this proposal has been formally considered and then approved by both the DAT and the CDRP and agreement has been reached that a single partnership will be created from the beginning of April to combine the work undertaken by these two bodies.  This partnership is likely to be further strengthened by the addition of the Community Safety Team from the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Police Force.

 

The partnership is to be re-titled Safer Communities Partnership to link with and reflect the broader community aspiration of that name as reflected in Theme 1 of Island Futures, the Island’s local strategic partnership.

 

For historical reasons, the management of the DAT and of the CDRP has been separate, both partnerships and respective staff groups having evolved from small beginnings.  At present, the DAT is managed through the Social Services and Housing Directorate with the CDRP managed through my own Directorate under the Head of Corporate Policy.  In the light of the creation of a single Safer Communities Partnership there needs, in my view, to be a single line of management for this area of work.

 

The Council has decided to act quickly to respond to the Green Paper ‘Every Child Matters’ issued followed the Laming report.  The Executive has agreed to create the post of Director of Children’s Services and with it a new Children’s Services Directorate.  To achieve these changes will require a number of alterations to the existing management structure of the Council.  

 

A report is due to go to the Executive towards the end of March recommending changes to the existing Directorates.  Children’s Services will move from the existing Social Services and Housing Directorate into the new Children’s Services Directorate.  In view of its changed focus, it is to be proposed that the Social Services and Housing Directorate be re-titled as the Adult and Community Services Directorate.

 

Within these management changes, there is a clear choice of Safer Communities being placed in management terms under either my own Directorate or under the Adult and Community Services Directorate.

 

The Executive will be recommended that the Adult and Community Services Directorate should take line responsibility for this area of work, it reflecting a clearer link with the remit of that Directorate rather than my own.  There is also advantage in separating the line management responsibility from the chairmanship of Safer Communities, a role undertaken by myself in accordance with national practice.  For all those reasons, the Executive are to be recommended that management responsibility for Safer Communities sits with the revised Adult and Community Services Directorate.

 

SCRUTINY ARRANGEMENTS

 

In terms of scrutiny, the responsibility for CDRP remains with this Committee and I would not recommend any change to that.  I would, however, suggest that the responsibility could usefully be amended to read Safer Communities rather than CDRP to make it clear that the Select Committee’s remit embraces the broader partnership rather than one of its former parts.

 

I hope this paper explains the current position and the proposals going to the Executive shortly.

 

RELEVANT PLANS, POLICIES, STRATEGIES AND PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

 

These proposals will ensure a clear link between the Safer Communities Partnership and Theme 1 of Island Futures, the Island’s local strategic partnership.

 

CONSULTATION PROCESS

 

There has been consultation with the DAT, the CDRP and the Police in relation to the proposals for a combined partnership.  There has also been extensive discussions with the two staff groups.

 

FINANCIAL, LEGAL, CRIME AND DISORDER IMPLICATIONS

 

There are no direct financial or legal consequences for the Council arising from this report.  There may be some financial implications for the new Safer Communities Partnership but those, if any, will be met by ring-fenced monies available to that Partnership.

 

BACKGROUND PAPERS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS REPORT

 

Report to the Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnership – 2 March 2004.

 

Contact Point: M J A Fisher, Chief Executive Officer, F 3102, e-mail [email protected]

 

 

 

M J A FISHER

Chief Executive Officer