6.1
Improvement Plan
Given
below is the EHD action plan for the near future. Many of the issues raised in this plan arise from the continuing
development of the service (e.g. Health & Safety Enforcement, Food Hygiene,
Statutory Nuisance Investigations) but some are as a direct response to points
raised during the consultation process of this review (e.g. administration,
communications, departmental structure).
Item |
Action
Required |
Officer(s) Responsible |
Resources Required (£) |
Action
Date |
Health & Safety Enforcement |
|
Principal Environmental Health
Officer (Environmental Protection) |
30,000 |
|
PROGRESS Self assessment
questionnaires all distributed.
H&S database of approximately 3000 businesses completed. Resources
to appoint additional Officer not identified. Featured as bid in Consumer Protection Service Plan
2002/3. To feature again as bid in
Service Plan 2003/4. |
||||
Food Hygiene |
We
should retain existing staff levels and inspection rates but concentrating,
in the immediate future, on continuing to reduce the backlog of inspections. |
Principal Environmental Health
Officer (Food Safety) |
|
It is
estimated that the backlog could be reduced within 6-9 months i.e. by
September 2002. |
PROGRESS Backlog of
inspections not cleared because of staff shortages. All vacancies in the Food Team were however filled early in
2003. Inspection levels in 2003/4 are
meeting required rate. |
Noise
and statutory nuisance investigations |
Continue
with the current procedures which have been updated recently to take into
account new legislation relating to human rights and surveillance issues. |
Principal Environmental Health
Officer (Environmental Protection) |
|
Ensure
that our procedures are in accord with the Council’s policy relating to
covert surveillance by 31st May 2002. Review
the use of log sheets and their effectiveness during March annually. |
PROGRESS Correct procedures are in place
relating to covert surveillance. Log
sheets viewed to provide essential evidence; therefore they continue to be
used. |
||||
Licensing |
Continue
with prioritisation, following risk assessment, of all Public Entertainment
Licensed premise inspections. |
Senior Licensing Officer |
|
Ensure that, by 31st March 2003, no
premises warrants a score in excess of 95. (based on the EHD in-house scoring
system). |
PROGRESS All
public entertainment licensed establishments are now risk assessed. The risk scoring system has been refined
since the Best Value Review was completed.
Our target is to ensure that no premise warrants a risk score in
excess of 210 (our revised in house scoring system provides for a maximum
score of 300). |
Dog Warden |
1.
Continue with concentrating on known fouling
‘trouble spots’ but review regularly the situation and increase routine
patrols as and when necessary. 2.
Increase EHD efficiency by transferring
administration duties to the Dog Warden contractors. Build in 2% cost reduction each year into
the new contract. |
Principal Environmental Health
Officer (Environmental
Protection) |
Some
saving |
Ensure that the contractor
carries out surveys of known trouble spots in October annually.
|
PROGRESS Island
wide patrol programme continues, all trouble spots are reviewed monthly. In depth annual surveys continue; next
annual review due this October. The year on year 2% cost reduction is built into
the existing contract. The contract
runs until October 2004 (Members may recall that the operation of the dog
warden service was scrutinised at a Select Committee meeting in January
2003). |
Pest Control |
1. Continue
with the current project but ensuring that, by cooperation with approved
contractors and Southern Water, there is no apparent increase in the numbers
of rats on the Isle of Wight. 2. Retain a
significant budget in case of deterioration in the levels of infestation on
the Isle of Wight whereby a need may arise for the Council to take more
direct control of treatment. 3.
Evaluate support for a free pest control service,
possibly costing £50,000 regarding the views of users, Members and Council
Tax payers. |
Principal Environmental Health
Officer (Environmental Protection) |
50,000 |
By 31st May 2002
arrange with Southern Water for bi-annual sewer testing and submission of
results of those tests. Within 8
weeks of the submission of those results a scheme will be devised, if
appropriate, to deal with any areas where infestation is recurring or is
excessively heavy. By 30th November each
year a review of the budget available for pest control will be carried out to
ascertain its adequacy in respect of:
|
PROGRESS Latest evidence from the sewer
baiting programme indicates a reduction in rat population in Island sewers. There has been no significant
change in the number of pest control treatments undertaken by our approved
contractors year on year. Subsidies continue for persons
on means tested benefit (the maximum amount payable for up to 3 treatments
remains at £5.00). Our pest control arrangements
currently costs approximately £18k. The
cost of a free service to all has been estimated to be in excess of an
additional £90k. |
General
Benchmarking |
Continue
benchmarking with the Hampshire and Isle of Wight NUB Groups, to maintain
high quality and explore any efficiency savings. |
Chief Environmental Protection
Officer Principal Environmental Health
Officers |
|
Review
best practice and working methods annually following the production of local
and national performance indicator data. |
PROGRESS General
benchmarking continues, contrasting local performance with that of
Environmental Health Services elsewhere.
Food, Environmental Protection and Health and Safety are also exposed
to inter authority audits. The authority’s
Food Law Enforcement arrangements have been scrutinised by the Food Standards
Agency. |
||||
Administration |
|
Chief Environmental Protection
Officer |
5,000 |
Formal and in house training has already commenced. It is hoped that a Modern Apprentice can
be appointed as soon as possible, but, in any event, no later than 1
September 2002. Work
should commence on this by 1 November 2002. |
PROGRESS A modern apprentice was appointed as planned and with support has recently obtained an NVQ in Administration Level 2. Improvements to reception
facilities have been introduced but not to the extent proposed. Reception facilities at St Nicholas could
be described as poor. In part, this
reflects uncertainty over long term occupancy of St Nicholas by Consumer
Protection staff; and in part acute difficulties we face accommodating
existing personnel. The problem is
compounded by plans to take on new personnel to administer and enforce liquor
licensing laws and the provision of Health and Safety advice to the Council. |
ICT |
Ensure smooth implementation and
effective use of the new software package. |
Principal Environmental Health
Officer (Environmental Protection) |
Already in budget |
Target date mid-sum 2002. |
PROGRESS New software
FLARE was purchased and introduced successfully across Environmental Health and
with effect from last April, also in Trading Standards. |
||||
Communications |
|
Chief Environmental Protection
Officer |
|
|
PROGRESS Communications could always be improved. The GAGS project has the potential to ease the apparent communication difficulties that lead to this item appearing in the improvement plan; albeit the evidence suggests that these difficulties are small. Consumer Protection
administrative staff receive customer care training. Surveys are conducted to seek
the views of service users. Initial meetings of a staff
focus group took place but those meetings have now stopped. Such meetings require issues for the focus
group to consider and a “co-ordinator”.
If either of these are absent the concept has reduced value. |
Merger with Trading Standards |
|
Head of Consumer Services |
|
From 1 April 2002 onwards. |
PROGRESS The merger with Trading
Standards (and Bereavement Services) took effect on 1 April 2002. Although these services collectively
operate as Consumer Protection a considered decision was taken to retain the
brand name of Environmental Health (and Trading Standards and Bereavement
Services). These brand names are well
known to the public, the business community, to Government Departments and
the media. Administrative budgets have been
merged and organisational structure provides for an Office Services Manager
responsible for managing Consumer Protection support services. The organisational structure
provides limited career development opportunities. Such a structure cannot overcome a national shortage of
Environmental Health Officers. |
Departmental
structure and decision making processes |
Continue
with regular staff focus group meetings and devise a more effective means of
internal communication, especially in relation to policy and operational
decisions. |
Chief Environmental Protection
Officer |
|
A
further staff focus group meeting will be held in January 2002 and at 6 monthly
intervals thereafter. |
PROGRESS See item 10. Although the staff focus group does not
meet, communication has improved.
Both the Consumer Protection Management Team and the Environmental
Health Management Team meet monthly.
Minutes are distributed to all staff in Environmental Health. The concept of a monthly staff briefing
has been retained. All staff gather
on the first Wednesday of each month for an early morning briefing on policy
and operational issues from the Head of Consumer Protection and Environmental
Health Manager. |
||||
Service Profile |
Produce a brief simple document
outlining our aims, targets and standards. |
Chief Environmental Protection
Officer |
|
Produce this document in leaflet
form for general distribution by 30/09/2002 |
PROGRESS A Service Plan (Consumer
Protection), issue specific fact sheets and leaflets are published and a
comprehensive web site is maintained. |
||||
Staff Training |
Devise a Training Plan for all staff based on the results
of their Performance Review Plan interviews.
Ensure EHD is ready for IIP assessment. |
Chief Environmental Protection
Officer |
|
By June 2002. |
PROGRESS An annual training plan is
produced. An application in principle
has been made for IIP assessment for Consumer Protection. |
Use of contractors |
|
Principal Environmental Health
Officer (Food Safety) Principal Environmental Health
Officer (Environmental Protection) |
|
|
PROGRESS The use of
Agency staff to carry out inspections remains an option but has not been
pursued. Agency staff are expensive
and our separation from the mainland leads to additional difficulties. Now that the Food Team is at full strength
inspection targets are being met. The Food Standards
Agency audited the Authority in September 2002. The audit report was complimentary but did point out that
inspection frequencies must be met. Responsibility for provision of
Health and Safety advice transfers to Environmental Health/Consumer Protection
by the end of this financial year. |
Enforcement
protocol with the Environment Agency |
|
Chief
Environmental Protection Officer |
|
Target
date for an agreed protocol September 2002. |
PROGRESS Discussions
have been held with Environment Agency (EA) representatives with a view to
putting in place a formal enforcement protocol. The Environment Agency has undertaken to produce the first
draft of that protocol. The
commitment to produce that draft has been reaffirmed in the last month. Staff
shortages at the EA have lead to slippage in the target date. |
||||
Ensure
that food premises proprietors understand our methods to ensure a consistent
approach to food hygiene inspections. |
|
Principal Environmental Health
Officer (Food
Safety) |
|
Target
`date August 2002. |
PROGRESS The
leaflet was produced and has been widely distributed. The leaflet appears on the Environmental
Health web site and is downloadable |