PAPER B
THIS IS
A COPY OF THE CABINET REPORT FOR SUBMISSION TO FULL COUNCIL FOR INFORMATION ON
15 NOVEMBER 2006
Purpose
: for Decision
Committee : CABINET
Date : 7 NOVEMBER 2006
Title : CORPORATE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
IMPROVEMENT PLAN
REPORT OF THE LEADER OF THE COUNCIL
IMPLEMENTATION DATE : 17 November 2006
1.
The purpose is to:-
(a)
receive the Corporate Assessment Report, to agree an
improvement plan, and
(b)
recommend Full Council debates the outcome of the
Corporate Assessment and the steps being taken to deliver improvement.
BACKGROUND
2.
The Corporate Assessment undertaken by the Audit
Commission and the Joint Area Review together form the Comprehensive
Performance Assessment, which is itself a very significant part of the external
assessment framework of the Council.
That framework includes annual direction of travel statement by the
District Auditor (due in February 2007) and assessments by regulators such as
Ofsted, the Commission for Social Care Inspection and the Benefits Fraud Inspectorate.
3.
Fieldwork for the twin assessments took place in May
2006 and the parallel reports were published on 14 August 2006.
4.
The Council has an obligation to adopt an action plan
in relation to the Corporate Assessment and to publish a response to the Joint
Area Review. The response to the Joint
Area Review is proposed elsewhere on this agenda. The Corporate Assessment judged the Council to be a two star
Authority.
5.
Improvement planning in response to the Corporate
Assessment is not taking place in isolation from planning and delivering
improvements driven by other factors - not least the Council’s own
ambition. It is for this reason that
the plan bears the title ‘One Council’.
One Council will be the framework for improving the Council over the next
18 to 24 months, looking forward to the next planned Comprehensive Performance
Assessment in 2009.
6.
Cabinet Members will wish to note that the 2006
Corporate Assessment was undertaken under an inspection methodology called the
Harder Test. The methodology judges the
Council against standards which are higher than those applied in a previous
similar inspection in 2002. The
practice of requiring every assessment to be more rigorous and challenging than
the previous one matches the ambition of this Council to improve ever more
rapidly and the entitlement of local communities to see the benefit of that
improvement.
7.
Links to the Harder Test inspection methodology and
the full Corporate Assessment report can be found at Harder Test Framework 2006. The summary and recommendations of the
Corporate Assessment are attached to this report as Appendix 1.
8.
Appendix 2 to this report is the proposed improvement
plan. The plan sets out the actions
which will be taken by the Council in the short and medium term to address the
weaknesses identified in the Corporate Assessment Report. A number of longer
term outcomes are identified, by which the success of the actions in the plan
will be judged.
9.
The Improvement Plan identifies where additional
resources are to be deployed.
10.
Full Council sets the budget and policy framework
within which the Cabinet operates. The
definition of the policy framework is set out in Article 4 of the Constitution
and includes the Corporate Plan. Aim
High was adopted as a corporate plan in March 2006. As Full Council adopted that Plan, it was acknowledged that the
CPA Improvement Plan would need to be added into the corporate policy
framework.
11.
It is therefore proposed that Cabinet recommend to
Full Council that it:-
(a)
notes the outcome of the Corporate Performance
Assessment, and
(b)
adopts the Comprehensive Performance Assessment
Improvement Plan to refresh the existing corporate plan
12.
The Corporate Assessment, and the opportunity to
develop an improvement plan, should be seen as opportunity to assist the
Council with its own locally driven improvement agenda, and most recently set
out in the Aim High Corporate Plan and to be further developed and driven by
the One Council document in the future.
CONSULTATION
13.
Stakeholders, including staff and partners, were
engaged in the CPA inspection process and their contributions are reflected in
the final report and recommendations.
Consultation in relation to the development of the improvement plan
included engagement with the various regulators who contributed to the CPA and
JAR inspection processes.
FINANCIAL/BUDGET
IMPLICATIONS
14.
Where additional resources are being deployed they are
identified in the plan.
LEGAL
IMPLICATIONS
15.
The process of CPA inspection, and improvement
planning is underpinned by the 1999
Local Government Act and the duty to provide continually improving services.
OPTIONS
16.
The action plan submitted is recommended as being the
best response available to the Council to the Corporate Assessment Report. Amendments can be made to the plan however,
the plan is a balanced and appropriate response to the outcomes of the
inspection, therefore the recommendation is that it is adopted as drafted.
17.
The Improvement Plan will be submitted to Regulators,
including the Audit Commission on 20th November. It is recommended
that the Chief Executive be given a specific delegation to make further amendments
to the improvement plan, in consultation with the Leader of the Council, where
any amendments will improve the quality of the Improvement Plan, without
changing the overall direction and objectives set out in the current draft.
18.
The Improvement Plan effectively replaces the Aim High
Corporate Plan as the principal driver of change and organisational
development. The recommendation to full council reflects this by proposing that
Aim High becomes, for the period until the proposed One Council plan is adopted,
the corporate plan.
19.
The principal risks to the delivery of the improvement
plan relate to ensuring that sufficient resources are deployed to ensure it is
delivered. Careful programme management
of the plan will ensure that the resources identified as necessary for delivery
are available and used effectively.
20.
Communication of the objectives and the detail of the
plan will also be extremely important and extra capacity continues to be
procured for both internal and external communications activity.
RECOMMENDATIONS 21.
That the Cabinet:- (a)
Receives the Corporate Assessment report. (b)
Adopts the CPA Improvement Plan set out as Appendix
2. (c)
Specifically delegates the Chief Executive to make
amendments to the approved draft, in consultation with the Leader of the
Council, where any amendments improve the quality of the Plan, without
changing the overall objectives. (d)
Recommends that Full Council:- (i)
notes the outcome of the
Corporate Performance Assessment, and (ii)
adopts the Comprehensive
Performance Assessment Improvement Plan to refresh the existing corporate
plan. |
BACKGROUND
PAPERS
None.
22.
Appendix 1
- Corporate Assessment Summary and Recommendations.
Appendix 2 - One Council - CPA
Improvement Plan.
Contact
Point : John Lawson, Director of
Policy, Performance and Partnerships and Deputy Chief Executive, ' 821000
ext. 3203. [email protected]
JOHN LAWSONDirector
of Policy, Performance and Partnerships and Deputy Chief Executive |
COUNCILLOR
ANDY SUTTON Leader
of the Council |