PAPER E

Purpose: for Decision

 

REPORT TO THE FULL COUNCIL

 

Date:               14 MAY 2003

 

Title:                DOGS ON THE SEASHORE BYELAWS

 

REPORT OF THE PORTFOLIO HOLDER FOR FIRE, EMERGENCY PLANNING AND CONSUMER PROTECTION

 


 


SUMMARY/PURPOSE

 

1.             To make a single byelaw with respect to the seashore under s82 and 83 of the Public Health Acts Amendment Act 1907 and s235 of the Local Government Act 1972 .

 

BACKGROUND

 

2.             Requests have been made to the Council requesting that the beaches set out below are designated dog free during the summer months (1 May to 30 September):

 

The beach from the eastern defence wall of the Ryde Harbour, easterly to Cornwall Slipway Ryde.

 

The beach from the eastern edge of the first set of steps eastwards from the slipway opposite the public toilets at east Cowes Esplanade for approximately 100 meters to the western edge of the next set of steps.

 

Extension to the beach ban area at Springvale

 

Extension to the beach ban area at Seaview

 

Extension to the beach ban area at Sandown

 

3.             One of the Seaside Award’s criteria is that relevant beaches have to be covered buy Dogs on the Seashore Byelaw.

 

4.             On 22 November 2001 following a report to the Executive, Full Council resolved to apply to the Department of the Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) to implement new dog on the seashore beach byelaws, to extend some of the existing areas and to consolidate them all in to a single document.

 

5.             During the final consultation period when a press advertisement was published an objection was received by DEFRA. This objection was referred back to the Council for formal consideration.

 

6.             DEFRA request an amended resolution. The objector has raised the following issues which members are invited to consider when deciding whether to make the byelaw:

 

1.        The route on and off the beach at Sandown is too steep

2.        The route is often blocked by the inshore rescue tractor.

 

7.             The Council’s Esplanade and Beaches Officer has responded to these matters as follows:

 

‘I have personally looked at the slipway and do not feel that even the elderly would find it hard to use. I therefore can not justify the need to allocate extra funding to install hand rails.’

 

‘With regards the obstruction of the tractor for the rescue boat, this only happens in the case of emergency which I am sure you will agree is acceptable in these cases. The equipment is normally kept in their building until they receive a call.’

 

STRATEGIC CONTEXT

 


8.             Recommended Byelaws are constant will the following Corporate Objectives:

 

1.        Improving health, housing and the quality of life for all.

2.        Creating safe and crime-free communities.

 

CONSULTATION

 

9.             The consultation process for byelaw applications is specific and objections are received by DEFRA following the Council’s advertisement in the County Press.

 

10.        During consultation carried out by the Authority, dog organisations, Parish Councils and local Councillors were consulted. Signs were also placed at beaches where any amendments were being proposed.  No objections were received from these consultees.

                       

FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPLICATIONS

 

11.        There will be minimal costs of providing new signage and printing of the new byelaws. These costs can be covered by existing budgets.

 

12.        No extra funding is required.

 

LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

 

13.        The Byelaw would make such a nuisance an offence liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 2 on the standard scale.  This is currently £500. Enforcement responsibilities would rest with authorized Council Officers and on contracted dog wardens.

 

14.        In coming to a resolution to adopt the draft byelaw, consideration should be given to the rights set out in article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the interference this byelaw will have on those persons who wish to exercise their dogs on the beach areas subject to this byelaw.  This byelaw will restrict their freedom to exercise their dogs by this interference is considered proportionate to the Council’s legitimate aim of protecting the public health.

 

OPTIONS

 

15.        Are as follows:

 

1.             To resolve to formally make the draft byelaw and authorise the proper officer to seal (properly attested) and date the byelaws on behalf of the Council.

 

2.             To further resolve that the byelaw be advertised in accordance with DEFRA recommendations and then after the period of deposit sent to the Secretary of State for possible confirmation.

 

3.             To make no changes to the existing Dogs on the Seashore Byelaws.

 

EVALUATION/RISK MANAGEMENT

 

16.        Option 1 will allow the new areas of beach and the extended beaches to be covered by legislative powers at minimal costs.

 

17.        Option 2 will provide a single document providing details of the prohibited areas.

 

18.        Option 3 may affect the Council’s ability to secure quality awards.

 

RECOMMENDATIONS

 

To approve options 1 and 2.

 

BACKGROUND PAPERS

 

Draft Isle of Wight Council Byelaw 2003.

Report and minutes to Executive 13 November 2001, minutes of Full Council on 22 November 2001 item 59.

Letter from DEFRA outlining why they were unable to make the Byelaw.

Response from Esplanade and Beach Officer

 

Contact Point: Rob Owen, Head of Consumer Protection, Tel: 823151 r[email protected]

MIKE FISHER

Chief Executive Officer and Strategic Director Environment Services

 

DAVID KNOWLES

Portfolio Holder for Fire, Emergency Planning and Consumer Protection