PAPER D


 

 

CHILDREN'S SERVICES SELECT COMMITTEE- 7 DECEMBER 2004

 

INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR SEN TASK GROUP

 

HEAD OF SELECT COMMITTEE AND BEST VALUE SUPPORT

 

REASON FOR SELECT COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION

 

To consider whether specialist advice should be sought on issues relating to SEN to assist the SEN Task Group in its work.

 

ACTION REQUIRED BY THE SELECT COMMITTEE

 

  1. To determine whether specialist legal advice should be sought on specific issues connected with the SEN Statementing process.
  2. The Select Committee and Review Team budget be used to fund this request at an estimated cost within the range of £660-£1,000 plus VAT.

 

BACKGROUND

 

Members will recall that it established a Task Group to look at certain aspects of the Council’s SEN policies and procedures. The Task Group has nearly completed its findings on the statementing process.  One important element in this process was the role and responsibilities of the Health Authority in providing information required as part of the statementing process.

 

Following discussions with the Chairman of the Task Group, Mr P Joyce, and the Chairman of the Select Committee there is a need to clarify some issues.

 

These centre around the duty of the Local Authority to seek medical advice from the Health Authority when making an assessment of special education needs. The appropriate Regulations also provide for the Authority to seek any other advice which it considers appropriate for the purpose of arriving at a satisfactory assessment. The Local Authority has to integrate, and interpret, the advice received in the statement, in terms sufficiently precise that it is very clear what special provision is required.

 

In taking evidence from a number of stakeholders the Task Group has identified difficulties encountered with advice from the Health Authority which is not sufficiently precise.   There can also be problems with receiving advice within the time limits within which the Local Authority has to produce a statement. A proposed statement must be issued within 18 weeks of the formal start of the assessment process, with a Final statement within 26 weeks. Whilst the Health Authority must normally respond within six weeks of the date of receiving the LEA request for advice. However the Health Authority is not obliged to respond within six weeks if it had no prior knowledge of the child concerned. Any delay can therefore impact on the LEA’s duty to comply with the statutory time limits.  This has led to the situation whereby the Chairman of the Task Group would like to obtain specialist legal advice on the role and responsibility of the Health Authority in the statementing process.  In view of the likely expenditure, estimated to be approximately between £660-£1,000 plus VAT, it was felt that the general view of the Select Committee should be obtained.

 

Mr Joyce has prepared five questions that he would like to submit to a specialist solicitor dealing with special education needs. These are attached at Appendix 1 and he will expand on these as required at the meeting.

 

RELEVANT PLANS, POLICIES, STRATEGIES AND PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

 

In the Ofsted Inspection of the LEA comment was made that “The LEA has improved in meeting its statutory obligations since its previous inspection but this area remains unsatisfactory.” Accordingly Recommendations 4a and 4b in the Action Plan are aimed at improving performance.

 

FINANCIAL, LEGAL, CRIME AND DISORDER IMPLICATIONS

 

The costs of receiving advice is estimated to be between £660-£1,000 plus VAT. This can be found within the Select Committee budget.

 

The Head of Legal and Democratic Services considers that in determining whether or not to buy in additional specialist advice, Members will wish to consider:

 

1.                  whether there is evidence of a significant problem with advice being received from the Health Authority being inadequate.

2.                  identifying in which areas the law is so unclear, controversial or technical that in-house advice is insufficient.

3.                  whether any additional advice would, when received, add weight to the recommendations contemplated by the working group.

 

Advice from counsel/leading counsel is usually only taken when a new or unusual, and potentially controversial, step is proposed - the legality of which is likely to be challenged.  The taking of that advice can be seen as an insurance against challenge, particularly from external auditors.

 

APPENDICES ATTACHED

 

Appendix 1 – Five questions

 

BACKGROUND PAPERS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS REPORT

 

None were used in the preparation of this report.

 

Contact Point :Paul Thistlewood, F 823285, e-mail paul.thistlewood@iow.gov.uk.

 

 

ALISTAIR DRAIN

Head Of Select Committee And Best Value Support


APPENDIX 1