PAPER C
CHILDREN’S SERVICES SELECT COMMITTEE – 7
DECEMBER 2004
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SCHOOLS FORUM
REPORT OF THE HEAD OF PLANNING AND RESOURCES,
CHILDREN’S SERVICES
REASON FOR SELECT
COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION
The Select Committee receives an annual report from the Chair of the
Schools Forum.
ACTION REQUIRED BY THE SELECT COMMITTEE
1.
To receive the annual report of the Schools Forum.
2.
To seek clarification or further detail from the Chair of the Forum.
BACKGROUND
The Schools Forum’s membership includes representatives of:
Headteachers and Governors from each sector of education; Diocesan Authorities
and stakeholder groups such as Early Years. The Forum considers all financial
matters as they affect the Education budget and advises the Council on the
priorities for expenditure within the Schools Block. This advice would be
offered normally in the context of the overall settlement for education.
Members will be aware that the FSS for the Council as a whole has been delayed
until 9 December (approx). The Chair of the Forum may feel able to give general
guidance to members but the full impact of the EFSS for 2005-6 will not be
discussed by the Schools Forum until its re-arranged meeting of 16 December.
The work of the Forum for the past year is the subject of the report which can
be found at Appendix 1.
APPENDICES ATTACHED
Annual
Report of the Schools Forum – Appendix 1.
BACKGROUND PAPERS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS REPORT
None
used in the preparation of this report.
Contact Point : Kim Johnson, Head of Planning and Resources ( 823410
e-mail : Kim. [email protected]
KIM JOHNSON
Head of Planning
and Resources, Children’s Services
APPENDIX 1
Isle of Wight
Schools Forum
Annual Report
2003/4
Introduction
The Isle of Wight Schools Forum was
established by the Isle of Wight Council in January 2003 in line with the duty
imposed by the Schools Forums (England) Regulations 2002.
Terms
of Reference
The Forum has agreed the following terms of
reference:
Mission Statement
The Schools Forum’s primary purpose is to
provide advice to the Isle of Wight Council on local decisions concerning the
allocation of educational funding and the determination of local financial
strategy. It exists to represent the views of schools, not only locally, but to
external agencies such as the Learning and Skills Council and to central
government.
The Forum interprets and reviews all matters
of educational funding and informs schools:
·
in an attempt to achieve a consensus view on local budgetary policy and;
·
in order to promote educational opportunities and guidance for all
pupils.
Composition:
The Forum consists of fifteen members:
In addition, the Isle of Wight Council’s
portfolio holder for Education and a number of officers of the LEA attend
ex-officio. A full list of members can be found at the end of this
report.
The
Year’s Progress
During the first eighteen months the Forum
has met ten times. The work of the Forum has focussed on three main themes.
·
A desire by everybody to understand the often complex issues affecting
school funding. To this end, the LEA’s officers have produced a number of most
valuable papers which have helped to make the issues much clearer.
·
The annual budget setting process. Two initiatives of central government
have had particular bearing on this process. The first of these was the
insistence that each school should have a guaranteed percentage rise. While
this has led to a comparatively trouble free budget round, the irony was noted
by the Forum that, in its first year of existence as a statutory advisory body
on the allocation formula, the rules allowed no changes to that formula to be
made. The granting of additional transitional funding has exercised the Forum
considerably. On the one hand, any extra funding which helped to ease the
financial hardship of the previous year was most welcome. On the other, it was
recognised that the very rigid rules for its distribution, while helping many
colleagues out of very difficult situations, could not reward those who had
been able to avoid deficits by effective managerial action.
·
The start made on reviewing those specialist services provided for
schools by the LEA or bought in by them. In particular, the Forum has
considered aspects of Special Educational Needs funding, the Schools’ Library
Service and the provision of school meals.
The funding of Special Educational Needs has
taken up a good deal of the Forum’s time this year and will probably continue
to do so into the future. Earlier in the year, the Forum expressed the opinion
that the cluster structure was not sufficiently developed to take on the responsibility
for allocating low incidence special needs funding. It was left to a future
date to consider whether such a move would ever be desirable. During the year
great concern was expressed over budgetary effect of the current law on
statementing. The most severe consequence of this was the impact on the
education budget of mainland placements and tribunal judgements, neither of
which took account of the needs of all Island children.
The School Library Service was the subject
of a Forum working party during the year. The recent history of the Schools
Library Service was examined and put in a national context. There was a high
level of satisfaction with the service by those schools, the majority, who used
it. There was, however, a significant group who did not use it and if this
group was to increase it would quickly impact on the viability of the service.
The Forum found that the service was a valuable one but recommended that the
review group which has been established meets at least annually to ensure that
it continues to be the best possible provider.
The awareness that joint services were
vulnerable to schools deciding to withdraw was in the foreground when the Forum
decided to examine the School Meals Service. Initial consultation, particularly
through Headteacher meetings, revealed a wide range of opinions on the service.
Concern was expressed in some quarters regarding the subsidy provided for
school meals by the LEA. Eventually the Forum has decided that it would
commission an external study with the following brief:
‘The Isle of Wight Council transferred the
supply of school catering to Group 90 (now Pabulum) in the 1990’s and they have
a contract for the provision of services. The Schools’ Forum are now seeking to
review this arrangement to ensure that they are getting ‘best value’ and that
the offer being made to pupils, parents and schools fulfils obligations and
meets needs.’
Communicating
Our Work
The Forum attaches a great deal of
importance to encouraging transparency in all aspects of funding allocation. To
this end members have encouraged as much communication of our work as is
possible. In particular, the minutes have been circulated to all headteachers
and to all clerks of governing bodies. In addition, all Forum material has been
made available on the Isle of Wight LEA website: www.eduwight.iow.gov.uk
Headteacher representatives of each phase
sector have regularly reported back to their respective meetings. Governor
representatives were invited to describe the work of the Forum to the Island
governors group.
During the year the Chairman has twice been
invited to join meetings of the Council’s Education Select Committee. This has
proved a most valuable channel of communication which all are confident will
lead to greater understanding and effectiveness in the future.
Measures
of Success
The ultimate measure of success will be a
growing sense of confidence that the resources available to education are
fairly and appropriately distributed. In the meantime, the Forum has identified
two other measures of its success:
·
A growing understanding among all stakeholders in education over how the
resources are distributed and the issues which underlie decisions on funding.
We are confident that great progress has already been made with this.
·
A hope that schools; headteachers, bursars and governors can use the
information available to make better and more confident financial decisions.
The Forum is dependent on those stakeholders
telling it whether it is, indeed, achieving these objectives and what else it
needs to do.
The
Future
Forum members are positive that a good start
has been made to their work. The next year will mean more to do on the on-going
issues of school catering, transitional funding and special needs funding. The
review of the Island’s education system is sure to have many implications for
the Forum. Likewise the changes brought about by the Workforce Remodelling
initiative will mean work for the Forum.
The new budget round will as always highlight issues regarding the
distribution of funding. Ultimately, members of the Forum will know that their
work is of value from the reactions of their colleagues in Island education. It
is up to all of us to ensure that the best use is made of this channel of
communication. The annual work pattern
of the Forum can be found at the end of this report.
Acknowledgements
The Forum is very conscious that its
activities have increased the burdens on all those who are involved with it. It
is grateful to all who have contributed their energy, time, enthusiasm and
knowledge to its activities during the year. The Forum would particularly like
to pay tribute to the officers of the LEA who have delivered papers and
serviced the committee with such enthusiasm and professionalism. To them must
go much of the credit for any successes which the Forum has achieved.
John Lucas, Chair, Isle of Wight Schools’
Forum
25 August 2004
SCHOOLS’
FORUM – MEMBERSHIP
Primary Schools
Tara Dean Governor
Dave Kitching Headteacher
Martin Lee Headteacher
Richard May Headteacher
Middle Schools
Lesley Ann Bryant Headteacher
Chris Gorski Headteacher
Helen Wilks Governor
High Schools
John Bradshaw Headteacher
John Lucas (Chair) Governor
Linda McGowan Headteacher
Special Schools
Mark Bell Headteacher
Alison Child Governor
Catholic Diocese/Schools
Peter Birks
Church of England Diocese/Schools
Penny Codd (Vice
Chair)
Early Years
Rose Ward
Isle of Wight Council Education Portfolio
Holder
Jill Wareham (ex officio)
Local Education Authority
Rob Faulkner (ex officio)
Janet Giles (ex officio)
Kim Johnson (ex officio)
Andrew King (ex officio)
Secretary to the Schools Forum
Mark Goswell
THE SCHOOLS’ FORUM ANNUAL
WORK PATTERN
SEPTEMBER |
Carry out review of Contracts, and
establish timetable. Receive final report from commissioned
work and make recommendations on further consultation. |
OCTOBER |
Receive and consider preliminary report on
national spending targets, and the Government’s autumn statement. |
NOVEMBER |
Analyse Government budget proposals and
recommend preferences for local implementation. |
DECEMBER |
Consult with schools on the Forum’s
implementation proposals. Report to Select Committee on the
considered opinions of the Forum regarding subsequent years spending levels. |
JANUARY |
Schools budget Review budget proposals Challenge alternatives. |
FEBRUARY |
Local Authority deliberation on total
spending proposals. |
MARCH |
Publication of individual school budgets. Setting up of commissioned work. |
APRIL |
Ongoing work regarding delegation of
services. |
MAY |
Draft Annual Report Liaise with Select Committee on agenda
setting |
JUNE |
Identification of probable savings for the
next financial year |
JULY |
Interim report on commissioned work. |