PAPER B
CHILDREN’S SERVICES SELECT COMMITTEE- 21 SEPTEMBER 2004
QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT REPORT - QUARTER 1
2004-05
REPORT OF THE PORTFOLIO HOLDER FOR CHILDREN’S SERVICES
REASON
FOR SELECT COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION
This Quarterly Performance Management Report is for
the period 1st April to the 30th June 2004 and is for the
Children’s Services Portfolio. This first report for 2004-05 was presented to
the Council’s Executive on the 25th August 2004.
ACTION
REQUIRED BY THE SELECT COMMITTEE
4. Determine if any further report is required from the Portfolio
Holders relating to the User Satisfaction Survey (2003) results as detailed
in Appendix 2. |
BACKGROUND
1.
This
Report for quarter 1 summarises performance for the responsibilities under the
Portfolio Holder for Children’s Services for the quarter ended 30th June
2004. The report format has been revised and now includes a risk
assessment for the new and existing Areas to Watch highlighted in the report;
and a revised basket of key performance indicators, with quarterly target
profiles.
2. The
results of the Best Value Performance Indicator User Satisfaction Survey 2003
is attached as Appendix 2 to this report.
In 2000/01, the Government
specified a number of Best Value Performance Indicators (BVPIs) that required
local authorities to survey local people. It was agreed that these user
satisfaction surveys, to inform the production of the indicator information be
conducted on a three yearly cycle. On that basis, the second survey took place
in autumn 2003. The performance data is factual and reports the outturn for
2003/2004 performance indicators as per the ODPM’s requirements and is
considered central to the authority’s performance management arrangements.
3.
Following
a contract tendering process an independent market research company, Questions
Answered, undertook to consult on behalf of the Council to ensure complete
objectivity of results. This took the form of a postal survey, which took place
in the autumn of 2003, and involved
randomly selecting 3,300 residents to be surveyed. The result of this was an overall return of 1,192 responses.
4.
Feedback
from the previous Resources Select Committee when the Quarterly Performance
Management Report for quarter 4. 2003-04 was presented have been taken on
board. The format and presentation of
the report have been changed and a revised basket of performance indicators
included in the report which includes a specific indicator concerning looked
after children.
5.
Significant
progress has been made throughout the year on targets and activities with the
Portfolio Holders responsibility including:
·
School
organisation, phase one formative consultation has been completed within the
agreed time parameters
·
Joint
action plan has been developed and is being implemented following Ofsted and
Children’s Services Inspection
·
Performance
Indicator 3 (page-9) – the number of looked after children per 10,000 less than
18 years at the end of the quarter. The
quarterly target has been met and is anticipated to improve throughout the year
6.
However,
there are concerns on the following:
Performance Indicators:
·
Performance
Indicator 2 (page-9) percentage of half days missed this quarter due to total
absence in secondary schools. The
indicator has not met the quarterly target
·
Performance
Indicator 4 (page-9) the number of looked after foster care children placed on
the mainland, there were 5 more children placed in the first quarter than the
quarterly expected target
RELEVANT PLANS, POLICIES,
STRATEGIES AND PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Best Value Performance Plan 2003-04
Annual Action Statement 2004-05
Quarterly Performance Management Report 1 2004-05
CONSULTATION PROCESS
Heads of Service and their staff have supplied the information within the Quarterly Performance Management Report, with Directors being fully consulted on the content.
External consultation has not been necessary for this report, with the exception of the User Satisfaction Survey, as it is concerned with internal financial and management arrangements.
FINANCIAL, LEGAL, CRIME
AND DISORDER IMPLICATIONS
The report itself does not have any financial
implications. However, if Members make decisions regarding services identified
in this report, these may have financial implications.
It is a requirement of the Local Government Act
1999 to deliver best value in service delivery of which an effective
performance management system is a significant part.
APPENDICES ATTACHED
Appendix 1 Quarterly Performance Management Report 1
– 2004-05
Appendix 2 and 2a BVPI User Satisfaction Survey
(November 2003)
BACKGROUND PAPERS USED IN
THE PREPARATION OF THIS REPORT
Quarterly Performance
Management Reports 1, 2, 3 and 4 (2003-04)
Annual Action Statement
2004-05
User Satisfaction Survey
Results 2003
Contact Point : Heidi Marshall,
Principal Policy Officer, 823250 [email protected]
COUNCILLOR JILL WAREHAM
Portfolio for Children’s Services