Purpose : For Decision
REPORT OF THE CABINET
MEMBER FOR ASSETS, PLANNING AND HOUSING
IMPLEMENTATION
DATE:
1.
To agree one of the options set-out in this
report, in relation to the Policy Commission for Care, Health and Housing’s
Blue Paper on ‘Affordable housing – low cost homes for Island people’.
OUTCOMES
2.
The purpose of the Blue Paper was to make recommendations
that will improve the provision of affordable housing and low cost homes for
3.
The purpose of this report is to ensure the
recommendations made by the policy commission inform the work to develop a Housing Strategy for Affordable and
Low Cost Housing on the
BACKGROUND
4.
The Policy Commission’s recommendations were as
follows:
I.
To confirm that the Council accept and are comfortable with the new
definitions of ‘affordable housing’ and ‘low cost market housing’ as set out in
Planning Policy Statement 3 and “Delivering affordable housing” These
definitions have been set by Central Government through Statutory guidance
Response: We welcome this recommendation.
II.
To develop detailed planning policies on low cost market housing to meet
the needs of
Response: We welcome this recommendation.
III.
To carry out further work to assess the viability of setting up a Housing
Trust. This should include homes with a
continuing discount. This
recommendation has been developed in response to consultation exercises
undertaken across the
Response: We want to explore this option further. A
Housing Trust may be a complicated way of addressing this. We are considering
the possibility of the LA developing a range of funding support to enable
IV.
The Council investigates the feasibility of introducing a tiered tariff
system for affordable housing to compliment the current threshold system. Any tariff system should be based on value
rather than the number of units and should apply in all circumstances. This recommendation has been developed in response to
consultation undertaken with private developers and a site visit to Milton
Keynes Council
Response: We accept the need to work within the
approved planning regulation and give developers a standard guideline to which
they can respond. We need to apply the thinking to all developments but be
flexible to make best use of the available sites to achieve the accommodation
required.
V.
That any changes to existing affordable housing policy thresholds brought
in as part of the Housing and Employment Development Plan
Document should be phased in over a minimum of six months and
involve consultation with developers and other stakeholders. The recommendation of a six month
minimum is suggested as a response to developers informing us
that they need time to plan development viability and
financial appraisals for the purchase of land.
Response: We agree with the spirit of this recommendation but feel that
the six months timescale may be restrictive and need further clarification.
VI.
That the Council develops design statements/specifications for large
developments (the definition of ‘large’ to be determined) to set out the
Council‘s vision for particular development sites. This
recommendation is included as a result of talking to other councils in the
South of
Response: We welcome this recommendation.
VII. Neighbourhood
Involvement Workers should be funded by developers as a condition
of planning, for large (the definition of ‘large’ to be determined) developments.
The role of these workers would be to bring residents together in
order to encourage the building of sustainable communities, rather
than just houses. This recommendation
builds on a site visit to
Response: We welcome the principal of this recommendation
but do not support insisting on it. Such workers are likely to emerge in such
projects and actually need to be in place (as in the Pan Urban Regeneration
Project) long before the developer is identified.
VIII.
To ensure that the provision of affordable housing and low cost market
housing is maximised on large sites. The
definition of ‘large’ is yet to be determined but for example: Council owned
land at Pan. However, development of
sites must have a sympathetic approach to the environment, quality of life and
sustainable community issues.
Response: We welcome this
recommendation except for the definition of large sites as we believe this
applies to all sites.
IX.
That the Housing Department seeks to increase the level of
investment for affordable housing brought to the
Response
: We welcome this reccomendation.
X. That
specific policies are developed for affordable and low cost market housing
in rural locations.
Response: We particularly welcome this recommendation
as we recognise the need to give greater attention to rural development.
The
local context:
5.
The
·
18% of households on the
·
25% of
·
90% of
·
The average house price on the
·
The average gross annual income for residents on the
·
This would enable an average earner to afford a £60,000 property based
on a mortgage of 3.5 times income
·
Typical first time buyer housing on the
·
Buy to let properties are providing a good supply of rented housing but
there are issues over gaining access to rural rented housing with average three
bedroom houses in Ryde renting at £610 per month compared to £795 per
month in the West Wight.
·
The affordability gap is even greater for many households who are much
worse off than the average would suggest. An analysis of applicants on the
Common Housing Register indicates an average head of household income of
£6230.38. This would allow only a £21,800 mortgage. On the basis of the
National Housing Federation (NHF) definition of affordability, i.e. 25% of
income for housing costs, this would suggest an ability to pay of only £30 per week.
In reality this means that for 90% of
Island House holds using a mortgage to purchase any type of home will be
extremely difficult.
National / Regional context:
6.
The South East is
producing only three quarters of the new affordable homes it needs each year
7.
New
housing market forecasts, commissioned from Oxford Economic Forecasting by the
National Housing Federation, indicate that by 2011 people in the South East
will be faced with an average house price of more than £322,000, nearly 40%
higher than today.
8.
On
9.
Planning
Policy Statements (PPS) set out the Government’s national policies on aspects
of planning in
10.
Local
Authorities need to plan for the full range of market housing. In particular
the need to deliver low-cost market housing as part of the housing mix. Low
cost market housing is no longer considered by the Government to fall under the
definition of affordable housing.
11.
The purpose of the enquiry was to:
I.
To
identify challenges to the provision of affordable housing on the
II.
The
Local Area Agreement sets out the aim to, “Provide healthy, safe, affordable
housing accommodation according the needs of
III.
A need
to better communicate and promote the concept of affordable housing.
IV.
To act
as the core working party for the Housing Market Assessment to underpin the
strategic policy framework of the Housing and Employment Development Plan
Document
CONSULTATION
12.
The Policy Commission worked through formal
and informal meetings, stakeholder groups, a dedicated email address,
consultation at a Housing Summit and through the Housing Strategy Consultation
in order to develop the Blue Paper recommendations.
13.
In addition to
the Policy Commission’s work, views and information has been gathered as part
of the development of the new Housing Strategy.
This includes the Housing Summit, Housing Needs Survey and Housing
Market Assessment.
14.
Consultees included two other local authorities:
·
·
East Hants
District council,
15.
Individuals seen / representations received
from:
·
Carol Alstrom,
·
Barratt Homes
·
Mr Morris Barton, advisor to developers
·
Dr Paul Bingham, Director of Public Health,
Isle of Wight NHS Primary Care Trust
·
Mr Ashley Curzon, Head of Regeneration,
·
Leigh Edwards, KingsOak
·
English Partnerships
·
The Federation of House Builders
·
Conal Grier and
·
Glen Hepburn, advisor to developers
·
Housing summit attendees (held on
·
Cllr Gill Kennet, Housing champion
·
Sharon Packer, Rural Housing Enabler
·
Neil Payne, developer
·
Martyn Pearl,
·
Mr Christopher Scott, developer
·
Mr William Smith, developer
·
Margaret Wright, South Wight housing
FINANCIAL/BUDGET
IMPLICATIONS
16.
The
annual revenue budget for homelessness contains limited resources for temporary
accommodation. If the supply of
affordable housing is not sufficient this may impact upon the Council’s ability
to remain within this budget.
LEGAL
IMPLICATIONS
OPTIONS
18.
Option 1:
To accept all recommendations in the Blue Paper
Option 2:
To accept the Policy Commission's recommendations in the Blue Paper as set out earlier in this report. This
will enable us to progress
the development of Affordable Housing and Low Cost Housing on the
Option 3:
Reject all recommendations in the Blue Paper
EVALUATION
19.
The recommendations set out above ensure that the policy of the Council
stimulates appropriate development across the whole range of accommodation. We
need to meet a wide spectrum of housing need and need our housing, planning and
estate management policies to work together to support those aims.
RECOMMENDATION
BACKGROUND
PAPERS
22.
Appendix 1
– Policy Commission Blue Paper ‘Affordable housing - low cost homes for Island
People’
Contact
Point: Mark Howell, Head of Housing,
tel: 01983 826061, email: [email protected]
Sarah
Mitchell Director of Adult and Community Services |
Councillor
George Brown |