PAPER A
RECORD OF DECISION
The following decisions were taken on 22 NOVEMBER
2005 by the CABINET
These decisions do not take effect
until 2 DECEMBER
2005
Members
of the Cabinet who were present :
Cllrs
Patrick Joyce (Deputy Leader) Barry Abraham, Dawn Cousins, Tim
Hunter-Henderson, Ian Ward, Jilly Wood
Confirmed
as a true record of decisions taken : ……………………………………..............
Leader of the Council
Agenda item |
Public Question Time |
Decision reference |
39/05 |
Question |
No
questions were asked. |
Agenda item |
Second Quarterly Performance
Management Report (2005-06) |
Decision reference |
40/05 |
Decision taken |
a)
That
the Cabinet Members commit to developing with Strategic Directors and Heads
of Service, in year solutions to under performing indicators for monitoring
through future quarterly performance reports b)
That
for this quarter no issues are referred to the Scrutiny Committee or Policy
Commissions c)
That
in future the QPMR be used along with other reporting mechanisms as part of
the gate keeping mechanisms for in year reviews of the “Aim High” Change
Management Plan d)
That
the service areas identified for improvement, commit to implementing the
Action Plan as attached to this decision as Appendix 1. |
Reason |
To enable effective
performance measurement and management. |
Additional reasons |
None. |
Options considered and rejected |
None. |
Interests |
None
declared. |
Additional advice received |
None. |
Agenda item |
Second Quarterly Performance
Management Report (2005-06) - Financial Exception Report for Period to 31
October 2005 |
Decision reference |
41/05 |
Decision taken |
a)
General
- Management action to be taken wherever possible to contain predicted
overspends/under-recovery of income in the current financial year within
existing service cash limits b)
Homelessness
- Consider budget as a significant element of the medium term financial
strategy c)
Bereavement
Income - Await outcome of Policy Commission VFM study into operation of the
crematorium d)
Land
Charges Income - Assistant Chief Executive to consider options for future
years if the decline in the housing market continues e)
Cultural
Services Income - Associate Director to deliver service improvement plan and
budget proposal for 2006/7 to avoid repeat of shortfall f)
Highway
Maintenance - Head of Service to deliver service plan and budget proposal for
2006/7, maximising use of both revenue and capital resources, to ensure
budget requirements can be contained within available resources g)
Car
Parking Income - Cabinet and Head of Service to consider all options when
recommending approval of the Car Parking Order for 2006/7 h)
Undercliff Drive/Ryde Interchange - Refer to Audit Committee to receive a report
assessing the risk associated with capital programmes spending significant
sums in advance of funding being secured i)
Education Programmes – Director of Children’s
Services to take action to ensure that delays in the capital programme are
corrected as projects are completed. As part of this process, schools will be
encouraged to undertake major condition and maintenance work to help clear
the underspend held in their devolved capital budgets |
Reason |
To ensure good financial management in order to
deliver service improvement and support the Council’s objectives. |
Additional reasons |
None. |
Options considered and rejected |
|
Interests |
Cllr
R Mazillius declared a personal interest as his son was a Director of a firm
that provides services to the Council. |
Additional advice received |
None. |
Agenda item |
Consideration of the Current Forward
Plan |
Decision reference |
42/05 |
Decision taken |
Cllr Wood advised Members that the item on South
Street Development would be slipped from December 2005 to February 2006. Cllr Joyce advised Members that the item on
Special Needs Education had been slipped from December 2005 to February 2006 |
Interests |
None
Declared. |
Additional advice received |
None. |
Agenda item |
Delegated Decisions |
Decision reference |
43/05 |
Questions |
No
questions were asked. |
Interests |
None
declared. |
Agenda item |
Members Question Time |
Decision reference |
44/05 |
Questions |
Cllr
J Effemey asked a written question relating to road surfacing (MQ) Cllr
R Mazillius asked a question relating to public play areas |
APPENDIX 1
Under performing KPI’s singled out
for improvement |
||
KPI
Description |
Action to be
taken to improve indicator and update on current performance as at 11/11/2005 |
Timescale
for Improvement |
4. The number of looked after
children placed on the mainland excluding placed for adoptions and with
family/friends |
The original figure of 29 supplied
for the quarter was wrong and has been amended to 19. This means that the
indicator would have been within target and not singled out for exception
reporting. The original comment supporting the
performance of the indicator was not correct and has been replaced with the following improvement actions:
Increase numbers of foster carers recruited and retained
Develop training programmes to increase skills of in house foster carers ·
Therapeutic foster care programme ·
Prepare business case for residential option ·
Develop Intensive Support Service ·
Develop inclusion policies in schools ·
Children’s trust developments to ensure early identification and prevention
strategies with vulnerable children · Pooled budget
arrangements |
No longer applicable as on target |
5. Number of fire and rescue call
outs to false alarms Apparatus |
Further increase in Q2 puts us well
above the outcome in 2004/5.
Discussions are taking place with the hospital and the prison (the two
worst offenders in reduction to unwanted fire signals (UWFS). The Hospital Apparatus alarms – 20 in
Q1, 24 in Q2 together account for 21% of UWFS in Q1 and Q2. Written agreements to be in place by March
2006 with the hospital and prison to use hospital/prison staff to challenge
all calls of fire signals at each institution to see if the alarms can be
challenged at source and therefore any unnecessary calls reduced. Target to reduce the number of UWFS from
each institution by 25% - 50% by 31 March 2006. Fire Safety Officers will inspect 75%
of all UWFS which will be targeted at premises in the top 20 generating
unwanted signals. Fire control centre operate a call
challenge policy when dealing with Automatic Fire Alarms (AFA’s)’s in low
risk premises which together with an inspection programme of the top 20
offending premises and a publicity campaign, will start to reduce the number
of false alarms notified to the Service. The Service already has a policy on
Call Challenge and Reduced Attendance to low risk premises, which was
introduced in May 2005. This policy of attending AFA’s will, in the first
instance reduce the number of appliances mobilised to low risk premises with
a further expansion of the policy to cover medium and high risk premises
(subject to risk assessment) in 2006/7 |
To
reduce AFA attendance at low risk premises by 10% by the end of quarter 4 and
by a further 25% by the end of quarter 4 2006/7. To reduce AFA attendance to
medium/high risk premises, subject to consultation, by 10% by end of quarter
4 2005/6 and by a further 25% by end of quarter 4 2006/7 |
9. The number of Food Standards
Inspections this quarter Reported as exception last quarter |
This is a new indicator for 2005/6
following transfer of responsibility from Trading Standards to Environmental
Health.
|
996 inspections to have been
completed by 31/12/05. Remainder of target to have been
completed by 31/03/06. |
10. The number of Health & Safety
Inspections this quarter |
This
is a new indicator for 2005/6.
Performance has been affected by higher than expected reactive demands
from music events, and accident investigations etc.
Predicted
performance as at year end is that target will be achieved |
|
3. Standard of cleanliness in public
toilets. No more than 12 defaults
issued to the contractor per quarter
(Local Indicator) |
An action Plan has been put in place
to address the current deficiencies in the service. The key milestones and
actions include:
|
By end of November 2005 By end of January 2005 By end of January 2006 Immediate Cleared within one week of issue By January 2006 By the end of the 1st
Quarter in 2006 |
13a. Planning - % of major planning
applications determined within national standards (13 Weeks) (BVPI 109a/CPA) |
The Council has been identified as a
Standards Authority by the ODPM for 2006/07 in respect of major
applications. The standard will
require that 60% of such applications are determined in 13 weeks. Officers and the Chairman of DCSC
will attend an ODPM/Planning Advisory Service workshop on this matter on
23/24 November 2005. The Head of Planning Services has put
forward for the Island to work with Idea on piloting of Delivery Agreements
on Large Applications. Performance at 11/11/2005 (for Q3
2005/06) is 42%. As from 21 November 2005 weekly
meetings will be held to monitor and track the progress and delivery of all
major applications. As from 28 November 2005 detailed
project management plans will be in place for all major applications (both
less than and over 13 weeks old). |
Applications under 13 weeks old at 11
November 2005 or new submission. Q3 2005/06 50% Q4 2005/06 50% Q1 2006/07 55% Q2 2006/07 60% Q3 2006/07 65% Q4 2006/07 70% Overall
total (including existing applications older than 13 weeks) Q3 2005/06 35% Q4 2005/06 40% Q1 2006/07 40% Q2 2006/07 50% Q3 2006/07 55% Q4 2006/07 60% |
14a. Affordable Housing – the no of
affordable housing units negotiated on qualifying sites identified in the UDP
(Policy H14) this quarter (Local
Indicator) |
The indicator needs to be read in
conjunction with 14b – in some cases it is more practicable to achieve
off-site payments rather than develop affordable houses on particular
application sites. Andrew Ashcroft and Margaret Howard
have met to review the situation. The
out-turn of affordable housing in general, and via planning consents in
particular will be discussed at a meeting of Registered Social Landlord Chief
Executives and officers on 8 December 2005. |
Q3 2005/06 25% Q4 2005/06 25% These
figures are difficult to predict with any accuracy. They depend on which applications are determined in the
relevant quarter (see comments on 13a) and the circumstances the relevant
affordable housing provision will be off-site (see 14b). |