PAPER
D2
Purpose
: For Decision
REPORT TO THE CABINET
Date : 17 JANUARY 2006
Title : RYDE INNER CORE TOWNSCAPE
HERITAGE INITIATIVE
REPORT OF THE CABINET HOLDER FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND PLANNING
IMPLEMENTATION DATE : 27
January 2006
1.
To support the Ryde Inner Core Townscape Heritage
Initiative and to agree financial measures to allow the implementation of this
initiative.
2.
None.
BACKGROUND
3.
Townscape Heritage Initiatives (THIs) are administered
by the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF).
4.
The THI is the Heritage Lottery Fund’s grant giving
programme to support communities in their efforts to regenerate the historic
parts of their towns and cities.
5.
The programme is designed to address problems in areas
of particular social and economic need throughout the UK. This encourages partnerships to carry out
repairs and other works to a number of different historic properties within
those areas, and to improve the quality of life for all those who live, work or
visit there.
6.
Applications are submitted in two stages. A stage 1 application for THI funding in
Ryde was submitted in June 2003 by the Council in conjunction with the Ryde
Development Trust (RDT). The outcome of
this bid was successful, and a Stage 2 application was invited, and HLF monies
were given to the Council/RDT to assist the preparation of further work.
7.
The Stage 2 submission was made in December 2004. Following further work it was approved in
August 2005.
8.
The area of the Ryde Inner Core THI scheme aims to
improve the appearance and condition of both the public realm and the building
stock within Ryde’s core retail sector.
It is intended to create an environment in which business development
derived through retail, service and tourism can
fashion
job creation whilst at the same time providing a quality of experience for all
who use the space.
9.
The THI also lies wholly within the Ryde Conservation
Area. It includes Union Street, High
Street, George Street and other related streets.
10.
The Ryde THI is an important strategic project. Its successful delivery will:
·
Assist in the development of a robust economic
infrastructure in balance with the environment (Aim High page 25)
·
Develop more prosperous individuals and businesses (Aim
High page 27)
·
Protect and enhance the Island’s environment and
heritage for the benefit of residents and visitors alike (Aim High page 36)
CONSULTATION
11.
Detailed consultation has been at the forefront of the
preparation of the bid thus far.
12.
Community and business groups have been engaged in
general, and property owners in particular.
13.
There is a high level of local support for the
initiative.
FINANCIAL/BUDGET
IMPLICATIONS
14.
The HLF has allocated £750,000 of the Initiative
towards a common fund of £1,500,000.
15.
The common fund is then allocated to target
buildings/proposed works. This common
fund is matched by building owners who supplement the difference between the
cost of works and the grant offered, (itself varying between a rate of 40-85%). The rolling out of the Ryde THI initiative
is likely to have a far wider impact both on investments in the town centre (on
schemes not eligible for THI funding) as investor confidence develops in the
area.
16.
The key issue for determination is that of the
identification of the £750,000 of public sector money to create the common
fund.
17.
The Stage 2 submission proposed match funding by SEEDA
through the SRB VI programme funds granted for the delivery of the Ryde Town
Improvements.
18.
This match funding stream is no longer available via
the Area Investment Framework.
19.
Alternative funding sources are as follows:-
(a)
Section 106 Agreements – particularly in respect of
major commercial and retail schemes in and around Ryde.
(b)
Capital receipts from the disposal of land and properties
in Ryde. The retention of 50% of
capital receipts from land disposals has been developed for Newport Harbour,
and would be appropriate in this context.
20.
Capital receipts likely to be achieved in Ryde in the
five years of the THI project include the proposed new hotel site adjacent to
Planet Ice and the disposal of land for future industrial/commercial
development.
21.
£122,859 match funding is already in place via the SRB
VI spend currently taking place in St Thomas’ Square. On this basis a total of £627,141 is required to be identified to
meet the Council’s contribution of £750,000 to the Common Fund.
LEGAL
IMPLICATIONS
22. To proceed with the THI proposal will not result in
a legal obligation for the council to expend monies over and above those received
through the two sources identified. Any
monies to be negotiated as part of the planning application process must be
relevant or desirable to that particular application and as is identified in
this report, uncertainty will therefore exist around the precise nature and
timing.
OPTIONS
22.
The following appear to be the principal options in
this matter:-
(a)
Decide not to proceed with the THI proposal.
(b)
Proceed on the basis of financial package set out in
paragraph 19 of this report.
(c)
Proceed on the basis of some other package.
23.
A decision not to proceed with the THI proposal would
undermine the confidence that has been generated in Ryde both generally, and as
a result of preliminary work. A
decision to proceed on the basis of some other package is dependent on other
sources of match funding being secured.
Advice from colleagues in Financial Services is that no other proposal
would be practicable. A decision not
proceed would also undermine the confidence of HLF, EH and possibly other
regeneration bodies such as SEEDA and English Partnerships in respect of future
grant awards.
24.
The option being recommended to Members is that set
out in Paragraph 19 of this report. The
Ryde THI will make an important contribution to the regeneration of Ryde Town
Centre and the Council’s wider regeneration objectives set out in Aim High.
25.
There are risks in pursing this option, principally
based around the uncertainty at this stage of both the precise nature of the
funding package or its timing. In some
cases capital receipts will be subject to appropriate planning consents being
granted. Similarly Section 106
Agreement monies will properly need to be negotiated as part of the planning
application process and as in themselves dependant both on planning permissions
and eventual implementation of proposals.
26.
In the event that the Council and/or others cannot
achieve the full extent of the local share of the Common Fund, the Common Fund
is reduced on a pro-rata basis.
27.
There is also the risk that he private sector will not
come forward with the range and type of schemes to match the Common Fund, and
that regeneration of important properties is not secured. This risk is minimised due to the extensive
discussions that have already taken place with property owners in the period
during which the staged application has been made. In the event that the THI does proceed appropriate staff will be
allocated to deliver the proposal.
28.
A decision not to proceed with the THI is initially
risk free. The financial package would
not need to be assembled and officer resources would not need to be allocated
to its implementation. Such a decision
would, however, preclude the investment of £750,000 into Ryde via the HLF. On this basis it would be unlikely that the
type of proposals envisaged by the scheme would proceed without the funding
envisaged from the Common Fund. In the
event that schemes did proceed it would be likely that they would not meet the
high standards which both the Council and English Heritage would expect in
relation to buildings in the Ryde Conservation Area. There is a wider and more long-term risk associated with not
proceeding with the Ryde THI. A failure
to deliver this project could undermine future regeneration projects both in
Ryde and elsewhere on the Island if the Council cannot demonstrate a proactive
approach in delivering such schemes in partnership with key agencies and the
private sector.
29.
Other packages to secure the Council’s match funding
have been considered but have not been pursued in any detail. It is inevitable that any financial package
would be subject to its own particular risks.
RECOMMENDATIONS It is
recommended that Cabinet: 30.
Support the ongoing promotion of the Ryde Inner Core
Townscape Heritage Initiative; and 31.
Approve the Council’s contribution to the Common
Fund as set out in paragraph 19 of this report; and 32.
Approve the use of funding from capital resources. |
BACKGROUND
PAPERS
Ryde
Inner Core THI – Stage 3 submission
Ryde
Development Trust/IOWC
Contact
Point : Andrew Ashcroft, Head of
Planning Services ( 825556
email: [email protected]
MR ANDREW
ASHCROFT Head of Planning Services |
COUNCILLOR
IAN WARD Cabinet Member for Environment, Transport and
Planning |