PAPER
B2
Purpose
: For Noting
REPORT
TO THE CABINET
Date : 17 JANUARY 2006
Title : SOCIAL SERVICES STAR RATING AND ANNUAL REVIEW OF ADULT SOCIAL CARE
PERFORMANCE
REPORT OF THE CABINET MEMBER FOR CARE HEALTH AND HOUSING
IMPLEMENTATION DATE : 27 January 2006
1.
Publication of the outcome of the CSCI performance
rating.
BACKGROUND
2.
The Council is required to publish the outcome of the CSCI
performance rating in an open session to the appropriate committee as soon as
practically possible after release on 1st December.
3.
The attached letter and performance review report set
out the Council’s overall social care performance and the more detailed review
of the performance of the council’s adult social care services. The council is required to present the
report in an open session and make the report available to members of the
public.
4.
Steps have already been taken to publish these documents
on the council website.
5.
The Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) holds
an annual review meeting with senior managers in social services. This meeting forms part of their overall assessment
of social services performance. It
focuses on the most up to date information which they have access to, through
the completion of the Delivery and Improvement statement and other evidence
provided.
6.
Following the meeting, the CSCI Business Relationship
Manager writes to the Director of Social Services setting out the inspectorates
view of performance and highlights both areas of success and recommendations
for how performance can be improved.
7.
The December 2005 Performance Ratings are as follows:
(a)
Social
Care Services for Children
Serving
people well? - some
Capacity for
improvement – promising
(b) Social Care Services
for Adults
Serving
people well? - Most
Capacity for
improvement – promising
(c) Social
Care Star Rating
Social
Services performance rating is 2 stars
.CONSULTATION
8.
Not applicable.
FINANCIAL/BUDGET
IMPLICATIONS
9.
The actions for improvement will need to be met from
the budget allocation for 2006/7.
LEGAL
IMPLICATIONS
10.
There are no specific legal implications .
OPTIONS
11.
Not applicable.
12.
The council is required to publish the report and
performance letter.
RECOMMENDATIONS 13.
That the comments and recommendations as set out in the
annexed report to the performance ratings are accepted. |
BACKGROUND
PAPERS
14.
Social Services Performance Assessment Framework.
Appendix 1 – star rating letter
Appendix 2 - performance review report for adult social
care
Contact
Point : Sandy Weller ext 2225 email :
[email protected]
SANDY
WELLER Head
of Adult Services |
COUNCILLOR
DAWN COUSINS Cabinet
Member for Care, Health and Housing |
Title of Report : |
Place Y for yes and N for no in the box below |
·
Can the
decision be taken under delegated powers by : |
|
·
The
relevant Cabinet Member? |
N/A |
·
An Officer? |
N/A |
·
Has the
decision appeared on the forward plan? |
N/A |
·
Has the Scrutiny
Committee had the opportunity/requested to consider the issue? |
|
·
Does the
Director’s Group need the opportunity to discuss the report? |
N/A |
·
If so,
insert the date of the meeting where the report was considered? |
|
·
Has the Cabinet
Members approved the report? |
|
·
Has
sufficient consultation taken place? |
N/A |
·
Is the
consultation set out and evaluated in the report? |
N/A |
·
If the
recommendation is not consistent with the outcome of consultation, are
reasons given? |
N/A |
·
Can an
elected Member (or member of the public) with no previous knowledge of the
report see sufficient background information (which can include reference to
previous reports) to allow them to understand the issue? |
Y |
·
Does the
report identify what strategic or policy aim is achieved or contributed to by
the decision? |
Y |
·
Are all
reasonable options identified and appraised? |
N/A |
·
Is there
additional risk management information that needs to be set out? |
N/A |
·
Has specialist
advice been taken for the following: |
|
·
Financial? Name of who gave advice: |
N/A |
·
Legal? Name of who gave advice: |
N/A |
·
Personnel?
Name of who gave advice: |
N/A |
·
Other? Name of who gave advice: |
N/A |
·
Is the cost
associated with the decision fully set out and the source of any funding
identified? |
Y |
·
Have the
following been considered and explained (where necessary) in the report: |
|
·
Human
Rights issues? |
N/A |
·
Crime and
Disorder issues? |
N/A |
·
Is risk management
properly addressed? |
Y |
·
Are all
background papers listed and available? |
Y |
·
Is the
implementation date clearly identified? |
Y |
·
If the
report is confidential or exempt is the reason for the confidentiality or
exemption clearly identified? |
N/A |
·
Are there
clear recommendations with reasons? |
Y |
·
Are the
report author and contact officer clearly identified? |
Y |