PAPER B2

                                                                                                                                                                                                        

                                                                                                                   Purpose : For Noting

 

                        REPORT TO THE CABINET

 

Date :              17 JANUARY 2006

 

Title :               SOCIAL SERVICES STAR RATING AND ANNUAL REVIEW OF ADULT SOCIAL CARE PERFORMANCE

 

REPORT OF THE CABINET MEMBER FOR CARE HEALTH AND HOUSING

 

IMPLEMENTATION DATE : 27 January 2006


SUMMARY/PURPOSE

 

1.                  Publication of the outcome of the CSCI performance rating.

 

BACKGROUND

 

2.                  The Council is required to publish the outcome of the CSCI performance rating in an open session to the appropriate committee as soon as practically possible after release on 1st December.

 

3.                  The attached letter and performance review report set out the Council’s overall social care performance and the more detailed review of the performance of the council’s adult social care services.  The council is required to present the report in an open session and make the report available to members of the public. 

 

4.                  Steps have already been taken to publish these documents on the council website.

 

STRATEGIC CONTEXT


 

5.                  The Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) holds an annual review meeting with senior managers in social services.  This meeting forms part of their overall assessment of social services performance.  It focuses on the most up to date information which they have access to, through the completion of the Delivery and Improvement statement and other evidence provided.

 

6.                  Following the meeting, the CSCI Business Relationship Manager writes to the Director of Social Services setting out the inspectorates view of performance and highlights both areas of success and recommendations for how performance can be improved.

 

7.                  The December 2005 Performance Ratings are as follows:

 

(a)               Social Care Services for Children

                                    Serving people well?            -           some

                                    Capacity for improvement –             promising

 

          (b)         Social Care Services for Adults

                                    Serving people well?            -           Most

                                    Capacity for improvement –             promising

 

(c)      Social Care Star Rating

 

                                    Social Services performance rating is 2 stars

 

.CONSULTATION

 

8.                  Not applicable.

 

FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPLICATIONS

 

9.                  The actions for improvement will need to be met from the budget allocation for 2006/7.

 

LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

 

10.             There are no specific legal implications .

 

OPTIONS

 

11.             Not applicable.

 

EVALUATION/RISK MANAGEMENT

 

12.             The council is required to publish the report and performance letter.

 

RECOMMENDATIONS

 

13.             That the comments and recommendations as set out in the annexed report to the performance ratings are accepted.

BACKGROUND PAPERS

 

14.             Social Services Performance Assessment Framework.

 

APPENDICES

 

Appendix 1 – star rating letter

Appendix 2 -  performance review report for adult social care

 

Contact Point :     Sandy Weller ext 2225 email : [email protected]

 

 

SANDY WELLER

Head of Adult Services

COUNCILLOR DAWN COUSINS

Cabinet Member for Care, Health and Housing



REPORT AUTHOR’S CHECKLIST

Title of Report :

Place Y for yes and N for no in the box below

·          Can the decision be taken under delegated powers by :

 

·           The relevant Cabinet Member?

N/A

·           An Officer?

N/A

·          Has the decision appeared on the forward plan?

N/A

·          Has the Scrutiny Committee had the opportunity/requested to consider the issue?

 

·          Does the Director’s Group need the opportunity to discuss the report?

N/A

·          If so, insert the date of the meeting where the report was considered?

 

·          Has the Cabinet Members approved the report?

 

·          Has sufficient consultation taken place?

N/A

·          Is the consultation set out and evaluated in the report?

N/A

·          If the recommendation is not consistent with the outcome of consultation, are reasons given?

N/A

·          Can an elected Member (or member of the public) with no previous knowledge of the report see sufficient background information (which can include reference to previous reports) to allow them to understand the issue?

Y

·          Does the report identify what strategic or policy aim is achieved or contributed to by the decision?

Y

·          Are all reasonable options identified and appraised?

N/A

·          Is there additional risk management information that needs to be set out?

N/A

·          Has specialist advice been taken for the following:

 

·           Financial?  Name of who gave advice:

N/A

·           Legal?  Name of who gave advice:

N/A

·           Personnel? Name of who gave advice:

N/A

·           Other?  Name of who gave advice:

N/A

·          Is the cost associated with the decision fully set out and the source of any funding identified?

Y

·          Have the following been considered and explained (where necessary) in the report:

 

·           Human Rights issues?

N/A

·           Crime and Disorder issues?

N/A

·          Is risk management properly addressed?

Y

·          Are all background papers listed and available?

Y

·          Is the implementation date clearly identified?

Y

·          If the report is confidential or exempt is the reason for the confidentiality or exemption clearly identified?

N/A

·          Are there clear recommendations with reasons?

Y

·          Are the report author and contact officer clearly identified?

Y