Purpose: For Decision
Committee: |
STANDARDS
COMMITTEE – MEMBERS ATTENDANCE SUB COMMITTEE
|
|
|
Date: |
15 NOVEMBER 2002 |
|
|
Title: |
MEMBER ATTENDANCE RECORDS |
|
|
|
REPORT OF THE STRATEGIC DIRECTOR OF CORPORATE AND
ENVIRONMENT SERVICES |
To consider the attached
(appendix 1) recommendation from the Council.
There are a number of points
within the recommendation that the Sub Committee needs to consider and these –
along with some comments from me – are detailed below:
Recommendation |
Comment
|
That the Council continue to publish attendance
records of Members |
The previous practice has
been that the record of attendance at the Council and its main Committee
meetings be issued to Members on a yearly basis. The production of the latest figures has been deferred pending
the outcome of this Sub Committees consideration of the matter. It is very easy for these
figures to be published and the Sub Committee may consider making an explicit
recommendation that they are published. |
That the publication of the figures is carried out
more frequently than is currently the case – possibly every quarter. |
This can be achieved with
little effect on current resources. |
Publication to be as wide as possible. |
It is suggested that this
should include the Council’s Internet site and the local press – copies can
be sent to the Libraries as well. The Sub Committee might like to consider if
these figures should also be sent to the Parish and Town Councils and the
Newport and Ryde Forums. |
Members have the opportunity to fill in a pro
forma on a periodic basis to allow them to give an account of their
activities outside County Hall |
If this is implemented then
any completed form should be published and form part of the publication of
the figures as set out above. There
is likely to be some significant logistical problems in ensuring that all 48
completed forms are returned for publication within what will be tight
timescales. |
The Standards Committee could have a role
collecting and publishing these activity statements |
I am not sure what role the
Standards Committee would have in this as it would be a straightforward
administrative function. |
The Standards Committee should also define what
constitutes an excused absence from a meeting by a Member |
The concept of a definition
sounds sensible however other issues arise – can such a definition be
suitably worded to cover all the variations on absence? What would happen if a
member was absent for what the Standards Committee considers to be an
“unauthorised” absence? |
There is a sharpened definition of the roles
Members are expected to perform and these roles should be also publicised in
an appropriate fashion. |
The
inclusion of job profiles for elected members is a requirement under the
Local Government Act 2000(Constitutions)(England Direction) 2000 – the need
for this has also been identified in the Councils own Corporate Plan. Such a definition needs to be developed
with existing members and I will arrange for this work to be undertaken
during the next 6 months with a report back to the Standards Committee. |
The figures collected for the
recording of Members attendance at meetings currently only applies to the formal
meetings of the Council (that is Full Council, Executive, Select Committees and
the Regulatory Committees). Attendance
at Task Group meetings, meetings of School Governors and Outside Bodies (to
which a member has been appointed by the Council to represent the Council) and
meetings on other Council business are not recorded. There is currently no
system in place to enable these attendances to be recorded and to do so would
require the submission of detailed data from either each of the 48 members or all
the School Governing Bodies/Outside bodies.
As a general point the Sub
Committee needs to be aware that under the new Modernising agenda the
government has made it clear that Members roles is not just about attending
meetings – this is one of the reasons why it has removed the requirement for an
“attendance allowance”. Much of the
work undertaken by members revolves around constituency work and meetings with
officers and other stakeholders outside the formal meetings of the
Council. Care therefore needs to be
taken in ensuring that the publication of any member activity accurately
reflects the work that a member carries out.
A specific example might be the Chairman of the Council who has to carry
out many dozens of civic functions and may only have the time to attend a few
meetings outside of the full Council meetings.
Therefore the publication of meeting attendance figures for the Chairman
will imply a low level of activity when in reality the opposite might well be
the case.
Equally a member who is not a
member of any of the political groups might only be allocated one Committee to
sit on and this might meet infrequently.
Despite this the member might carry out many constituency meetings/work
all of which will go unrecorded in the official lists of meeting attendances.
Technically we will be able
to have available on the internet the basic statistics for any one to see at
anytime. This data can be updated live
and so will reflect the current position.
The web page that displays the data will need to explain that this
information is a simple record of attendances and members of the public should
seek to address any issues they have direct with the member concerned.
There is no statutory
requirement to publish the data referred to in this report. The principles of
the Data Protection Act 1998 will apply and the publication must be with the
informed consent of each member, who should be given the opportunity to confirm
the accuracy of the data prior to publication. Care needs to be taken to ensure
that such a statement does not contravene the restriction on the Council
publishing political material therefore any such statement shall have to be
restricted to the facts. Logistically
we will probably need to restrict the number of words used.
RECOMMENDATION
1.
That as soon as
practicable the Council’s web site contain a page displaying members
attendance record. 2.
That as from 1 April
2003 the members attendance statistics be published on a quarterly basis but
that prior to the publication each member is invited to comment on the data
and if they wish to add a section (of no more than 100 words) referring to
what other work they have undertaken for the Council during the period
covered by the statistics, and any other relevant comment they wish to add. 3.
That for this year the
attendance figures be published with an explanation that they do not include
a whole range of other meetings/work undertaken by members. 4.
That the establishment
of a Members job profiles be undertaken during the next 6 months with reports
to the Standards Committee. |
Statistics from the training
sessions
Contact Point: Chris
Mathews, F 823280
|
MIKE
FISHER Strategic Director Corporate and Environment Services |
Appendix 1
“That the Council considers
adopting mechanisms of accountability that Members have to abide by for the
receipt of their allowances. In particular, the Panel recommends that at the very least that the Council continue
to publish attendance records of Members. Furthermore, the Panel recommends
that this be done more frequently than is currently the case, which is annually
as is the annual publication of allowances each Member receives. The Panel
recommends that these attendance figures be published every quarter so that constituents have a more meaningful and ongoing
means by which they can judge the formal performance of their elected Members.
This is a common practice elsewhere and is fairly straightforward to implement.
Nor does it preclude the Council from advertising more widely Members’
attendance records, such as in local libraries. The Council could go much
further if it wishes. In addition, the Panel also suggests that Members have
the opportunity to fill in a pro forma on a periodic basis to allow them to
give an account of their activities outside County Hall. This should enable
them to give an account of their own activities beyond their attendance at
formal meetings of the Council and its outside bodies. These activity
statements could be posted on the Council’s web pages for electors and other
interested parties to evaluate. Alternatively, the Standards Committee could
have a role collecting and publishing these activity statements. The Standards
Committee should also define what constitutes an excused absence from a meeting
by a Member. The Panel also recommends that in the interests of clarity and
transparency that there is a sharpened definition of the roles Members are
expected to perform and these roles should be also publicised in an appropriate
fashion. It gives the electorate a means by which they could potentially
measure Members’ performances and informs potential and current Members what
they are expected to do in return for their increased allowances. “