PAPER B2
43/06
Purpose
: For Decision
DECISION
UNDER DELEGATED POWERS
DECISION
CANNOT BE TAKEN BEFORE MONDAY, 14 AUGUST 2006
Title : Procurement of Strategic
Transformational Partner
Short
Term Procurement Projects
REPORT TO THE CABINET
MEMBER FOR THE ECONOMY, THE CUSTOMER, COMMUNICATIONS, LEISURE AND TOURISM
1.
To
formally accept the outline business case produced by PA Consultants as
performance of their contract to advise, and as the basis for further
developmental work.
2.
To
appoint PA consultants to undertake work, as proposed by letter dated 26 June
2006, to:
·
procure
a Strategic Transformational Partner
·
improve
the corporate procurement function
3. The detailed proposal is set
out as appendix 1 (confidential).
4. Appendix 2 reproduces a report to
Cabinet on the 11 October 2005 and the record of the decision.
5. The October 2005 report sets
out the outcome of a procurement exercise to identify advisors for two phases
of developing a strategic partner – an outline business case and a procurement
exercise.
6. The decision to appoint PA
consultants on 11 October was subject to completion of an initial 6 week
feasibility study. That study was completed satisfactorily and the outline
business case developed during the first quarter of 2006.
7. The outline business case
delivered by PA is of a quality which can be accepted both as delivering the
brief given, and to be the basis for the procurement of a strategic
transformational partner.
8. As an exercise separate from
the principal consultancy contract PA consultancy have advised on the potential
efficiencies to be delivered through new approaches to corporate procurement.
9. Undertaking two exemplar
projects will enable the Strategic Transformational Partnership project to
deliver efficiencies during the developmental phase. Activity proposed by the
exemplar projects will realise up to £500,000 per annum, on a recurring basis,
from the conclusion of the pilot projects. The total cost of the developmental
and procurement consultancy is £99,050.
STRATEGIC
CONTEXT
10. Three aims set out in
Aim High under the Run a High Performing Costs Effective Council objective are:
·
Ensure
that all services are cost effective and offer maximum value for money
·
Create
effective partnerships where they improve service delivery, cost effectiveness
or community engagement
·
Be
an exemplar of good practice in the appropriateness and use of central systems
and processes
11. Staff and trades unions have been engaged
in the development of the Outline Business case and no discrete consultation
has taken place in relation to the decision to proceed to the next phase, and
to undertake a procurement project in parallel.
FINANCIAL/BUDGET
IMPLICATIONS
12.
The
£99,050 cost of undertaking the developmental phase and the procurement project
are provided for within a one off reserve earmarked for this purpose.
Efficiencies realised from the procurement project will form part of corporate
budget and priority setting, and the delivery of the Medium Term Financial plan
LEGAL
IMPLICATIONS
13.
When
procuring the delivery of services the Council is under an obligation to
achieve Best Value and to ensure compliance with European Union Procurement
Directives.
The Legal Department has assessed
the developmental
phase of the procurement project and concluded that it forms part of the original
remit which the Council specified in its Invitation to Tender. Whilst it is clear that the specific nature
of the work has evolved and developed from that originally envisaged by the
Council, this is seen as a natural corollary of the evaluation work which was
requested of, and undertaken by PA.
The
original threshold for the work to be undertaken by PA was £153,000. Once this work contemplated in this report
is completed, the cumulative value of work awarded to PA will be approximately
£180,000 plus expenses amounting to an additional 10%. The risk to the Council of having exceeded
the original threshold is low as this increase is not so significant as to
warrant a further tender process.
From
this point forward however, the Council will need to be cognisant of the
cumulative value of work awarded to PA Consulting and should any further work
be proposed beyond that contemplated herein, it will need to be subject to a
more robust award process.
14.
Advice from PA, in the form of the outline business
case and the procurement diagnostic is that the development of the Strategic
Transformational Partner and the parallel delivery of the procurement project
will result in the development of a fit for purpose Strategic Transformational
Par5nership, which will contribute significantly to the delivery of the Medium
Term Financial Plan.
The alternatives
to accepting the 26 June proposal from PA are to do nothing or to undertake the development work in a
different way, using other advisors. To take either of these options would be
to miss the opportunity to make a significant contribution to delivery of the
Medium Term Financial Plan with immediate effect.
15.
The efficiencies to be released by the procurement
project and by the development of the Strategic Transformational Partnership,
are required within the current and subsequent financial years.
16.
In order to ensure that the project stays on target, a
project group has been formed and will agree and manage the delivery of the
proposed consultancy activity as a formal project.
RECOMMENDATIONS
17. To accept the
proposal from PA and to deliver that proposal as a project. |
18. Outline
Business Case
Proposal
None
APPENDICES
ATTACHED
Appendix
1 (confidential) – Copy of the letter
from PA Consulting to John Lawson dated 26 June 2006
Appendix 2 – Copy of the report to
Cabinet on 11 October 2005 and the Record of Decision
Contact
Point : John Lawson ( 823203,
email: [email protected]
JOHN
LAWSON Director
of Partnership, Policy and Performance and Deputy Chief Executive |
COUNCILLOR
TIM HUNTER-HENDERSON Cabinet Member for the Economy, the Customer, Communications, Leisure and Tourism |
Signed
: ………………………………………………………………………………………
Date :
…………………………………………………………………………………………..