MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
SCRUTINY COMMITTEE HELD AT COUNTY HALL, NEWPORT, ISLE OF WIGHT ON THURSDAY, 22 DECEMBER 2005 COMMENCING AT 6.00 PM
Present :
Cllrs Garry Price (Chairman), Anne Bishop
(deputising for William Burt), Mike Cunningham, Brian Mosdell
Co-opted Members (Voting): Ms Sue Poston
Co-opted Members (Non-voting): Mr Bob Blezzard,
Also
Present (Non voting) :
Cllrs Geoff Lumley, Jilly Wood
Apologies:
Cllr William Burt, Mr Anthony Marvin
13.
MINUTES
RESOLVED:
THAT the minutes of the meeting held on 24 November 2005 were confirmed.
14.
DECLARATIONS
OF INTEREST
A written declaration of interest had been received
from Mr Bob Blezzard relating to Sandown County Middle School and Sandown Town
Council. No further declarations were
received at this stage.
15.
URGENT
BUSINESS – CO-OPTED MEMBERSHIP OF THE COMMITTEE
The Members were reminded that the full Council, at its meeting on 14
September 2005, agreed to a revised membership for the Scrutiny Committee. This included a scheme under Section 115 of
the Local Government Act 2000 for the appointment of two co-opted members. The provisions of the legislation enabled
such co-opted members to have full voting rights.
The appointment of a representative nominated by the Town and Parish
Councils was outside of the approved Section 115 scheme and therefore the
person did not have full voting rights.
The Scrutiny Committee considered that the Town and Parish Council
representative should have the same voting rights as the two other co-opted
members. This could only be achieved by
the full Council amending the Section 115 scheme.
RESOLVED TO RECOMMEND TO FULL COUNCIL:
THAT the scheme made under Section 115 of the Local Government Act 2000
be amended to enable the Town and Parish Council representative the same voting
rights as the other two co-opted Members.
16.
BUDGET
UPDATE
The Chief Financial Officer provided an oral
update for the Committee, and confirmed that the Council had been advised of
the Government Grant for 2007/08 as well as 2006/07. Members were advised that after 2007/08, the Government would be
announcing Government Grants for a 3 year period, thus enabling longer term
budget planning for local authorities.
Concerns remained about the change in
methodology of future Government Grants, and Members were advised that any
changes to the Area Cost Adjustment could adversely affect the Island.
As part of the consultation exercise, 5
Focus Groups had been established to consider specific budget issues. A facilitator had been used during the three
consultation sessions to date, and the results had been extremely useful.
The Cabinet Secretaries were currently
considering the suggested 5% efficiency savings put forward by Heads of Service
and the service priorities list submitted by the Members’ Panel. It was anticipated that although the
Government Grant was better then initially expected, any advantage could be
taken up by new funding pressures caused by costs transferred to the Council by
the Health Trusts.
Members noted that big pressures for the Council included inflationary
increases, increases in costs for providing Adult Services, Children in
Transition, and support for the homeless.
An initial budget report for the forthcoming financial year would be
presented to the Cabinet in January 2006, with the final budget recommendation
to the Council probably being formulated at the Cabinet meeting scheduled for 7
February 2006.
RESOLVED:
THAT the report be noted.
17.
PERFORMANCE
MANAGEMENT AND SCRUTINY
The Committee was advised that the Quarterly Performance Management
Report provided statistical information on performance of council services in
relation to the corporate objectives.
Information had been prepared on a quarterly basis and presented to
Cabinet. However, it had traditionally
taken approximately eight weeks to produce the report, by which time it was
often too late to affect the results.
In order to improve the process, the Performance Management Team had
undertaken research for the acquisition of an appropriate software package to
better manage the Council’s performance.
A preferred supplier had been selected.
It was envisaged that the new software would produce a report to Cabinet
in mid-April relating to the final quarter of 2005/06.
The proposed new software package would provide more information at an
earlier stage, which would enable the Scrutiny Committee to make a real impact
on service improvement in the future.
Members were advised that a demonstration of the new software had been
arranged for 6 January 2006 and all were invited to attend.
RESOLVED:
i. THAT the Scrutiny Committee support in
principle, the purchase of performance management software to assist the
Council in delivering its priorities and objectives as it would be an
invaluable tool in the Committee’s work.
ii. THAT the Corporate Policy Officer forward
details of the software demonstration scheduled for 6 January 2006 to all
Members of the Scrutiny Committee.
CHAIRMAN