PAPER B
REPORT TO POLICY COMMISSION FOR SAFER COMMUNITIES
Date : 2 NOVEMBER 2006
Subject : CORPORATE
ENFORCEMENT (Saf4/05)
Report
of : ROB
OWEN, HEAD OF CONSUMER PROTECTION
SUMMARY/PURPOSE
1.
This report is to update
the Commission on the outcomes from the Corporate Enforcement Workshop which
was held on 17 October 2006.
ATTENDANCE
2.
Those in attendance
at the workshop were as follows:
3.
Cllrs Williams, Wood, Ward, Hunter-Henderson, Joyce,
Scoccia, Pugh, Wells, Humby, Abraham, Churchman, Tuson, Sutton.
4.
Officers: Joe Duckworth, April West, Vanda Niemiec, Rob
Owen, Ian Sandbrook, Sarah Mitchell, Richard Stone, Warren Haynes, Steve
Cornwell, John Lutas, Steve Boswell, Alan Barnes, Pete Griffiths, Steve
Milford, Heather Lovell, Alex Hicks, Paul Street, Alec Southcott, Steve Apter.
PRESENTATIONS
5.
An introduction to the workshop was provided by Cllr Andy
Sutton and Joe Duckworth. Presentations on enforcement describing
activity in different areas of the Council were then provided by:
·
Ian Sandbrook – Children’s Services
·
Steve Boswell – Environment and Neighbourhoods
·
Steve Cornwell – Planning
·
John Lutas – Building Control Manager
·
Warren Haynes – Environmental Health
·
Richard Stone – Trading Standards
·
Heather Lovell – Safer Communities
·
Steve Apter – Fire and Rescue
·
Pete Griffiths – Housing
GROUP WORK
6.
Those present at the workshop then split into 4 groups,
based on a four block approach to enforcement, to discuss the advantages/disadvantages
of current working practices; whether there were new ways of working which
should be considered; what other enforcement activities could sit within that
block; what were the barriers to new ways of working; and how enforcement
activity can generally be improved.
7.
The four blocks are
as follows:
·
Planning and Building Control
·
Premises Based Enforcement
·
Environmental Crime
·
Highways, inc. De-Criminalised Parking
GROUP WORK
FEEDBACK
8.
All four groups reported back the following areas as
issues/suggestions for improvement:
·
Sharing of data between departments needs to be improved. The introduction of a corporate GIS system onto
which all enforcement data could be downloaded, would assist effective targeted
enforcement through the identification of high risk premises/hot spots.
·
Clear protocols which detail enforcement responsibilities being
developed; this will assist in informing which department is responsible for
which enforcement area.
·
Internal and external communication clarifying which
department is responsible for which enforcement area being improved (inc.
Parish and Town Councils).
·
Explore the overlapping licensing / permitting functions
across the authority in order to be more effective.
·
Establishing a clear contact point for the public, elected
members and staff to use to report incidents that may require enforcement
action (based on SNEN).
·
Resources.
9.
Staff involved in enforcement activity should continue to
specialise in their service area, but the sharing of information is essential.
10.
Other suggestions included joint training, in particular on
the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.
The in-house prosecutors’ forum could assist with this.
Date: 24
October 2006
Contact Point
: Rob Owen, Head of Consumer
Protection ' 826388, email
[email protected]