THE ISLE OF WIGHT JOINT AREA
REVIEW ACTION PLAN
Last updated 16:00 25th September
2006: Version 0.10
Final copy to be completed
by 20th November 2006
Issue 1 |
Agree and implement a school
improvement strategy with schools |
|||
Outcomes |
significantly improved performance
of all the Island’s schools |
|||
Measures of Success |
meet
LAA targets for achievement : July 2007 : KS2 - 78% Eng; 74%
Maths KS3 - 69% Eng; 74% Maths KS4 - 49% 5A*-C July
2008 : KS2 – 80% Eng; 78% Maths KS3 – 72% Eng; 76% Maths KS4 – 53% 5A*-C July
2009 : KS2 – 82% Eng; 80% Maths KS3 – 74% Eng; 78% Maths KS4 – 57% 5A*-C Reduce
number of schools identified as Cause for Concern – from
19 (27%) at February 2006 to target of 10 (14%) at October 2006; 6 (8%) at
July 2007; 3 (4%) at October 2007; and 0 at July 2008 |
|||
Actions |
Date |
Who |
Outputs |
Resources |
1. strengthen and improve
leadership and management |
|
Council Rose
Ward, pending arrival of new Head of School Improvement and Learning
Effectiveness |
secure leadership teams in every
school with the competence and capability to drive up standards |
Link
Inspector team Primary
Strategy Team Secondary
Strategy Team Council
and Children’s Trust management teams Special
Educational Needs teams Through the Roof project: Partner schools Partner authorities National strategy teams NCSL Specialist Schools Trust |
2. strengthen and improve
self-evaluation |
|
accurate, evidence-based
self-evaluations in every school which provide secure analysis of development
needs |
||
3. strengthen and improve teaching
and learning |
|
at least good teaching in every
class and subject |
||
4. strengthen and improve pupil
tracking |
|
the means
to identify and manage individual pupil progress in schools and across
clusters to maximize pupil
achievement and to minimize learning loss at transitions |
||
5. strengthen and improve data
management systems |
|
the necessary technical and
analytical infrastructure to support effective tracking and management of
individual pupil progress |
||
6. strengthen and improve
governance |
|
governors who know how well their
schools are doing and who have the confidence and competence to challenge
underperformance and provide the strategic leadership necessary to successful
schools |
||
7. strengthen and improve the
monitoring, support, challenge, and intervention provided by the local
authority |
|
officers and inspectors who know
how well their schools are doing and who have the confidence and competence
to challenge underperformance and provide the right advice for school and
cluster improvement |
Issue 2 |
Develop and implement an access
and inclusion strategy |
|||
Outcomes |
every young person successfully
accessing his/her full entitlement across the 5 outcomes |
|||
Measures of Success |
LAA
Targets 1.
Authorised & unauthorised half days missed as a % of total half days
attended Middle
Schools 9-13 yrs - Target 6.3% April 07 High
Schools 14 – 19 yrs (LPSA) – Target 10.2%
April 07 APA 2.
To align with SN at 4.77% on authorised absence in primary schools by 2008 3.
Local target To
reduce by 5% the No of LAC /SEN pupils on fixed term exclusion Provision of full time education for pupils with 5 or more
days exclusion; in line with government policy, from September 2007 Keep level of permanent exclusions low/reduction to zero. Faster reintegration into another school for those that are
permanently excluded |
|||
Actions |
Date |
Who |
Outputs |
Resources |
1. attendance |
end
September 2006 |
Council
Keith
Simmonds, HoLE, / Prue Grimshaw, HoCF Doug
Wright, Access and Inclusion Officer |
School
leadership teams effectively link attendance to achievement outcomes. The
data infrastructure enables effective tracking of individual attendance and
intervention Area
parenting support can be effectively used as a preventative strategy with
families SIMS attendance module (finally) in operation |
Link
Inspector team Primary
Strategy Team Secondary
Strategy Team Access
and Inclusion Service Youth
Service Council
and Children’s Trust management teams Special
Educational Needs teams Through
the Roof project: Partner
schools Partner
authorities National
strategy teams NCSL Specialist
Schools Trust Establishment
of cluster support centres - £350,000 over three years Need for co-ordination of polices, plans and resources-not
just across Children’s Services, but the whole island-public and voluntary
sectors. Some resources are already committed for these tasks: SIMS Attendance and Sentinel have been purchased. Use of Youth Service and its resources in flexible
timetabling. Education Welfare Service, Pupil Referral Units, Behaviour
Support Service, KS 3 and 4 Behaviour and Attendance Consultant. Staff time and IT resources to implement such monitoring Funding needs to be found for local units and continued
expansion of WISE satellites. Need for better I.T. resources to enable home working
/studying for pupils and staff. Further resources need to be identified/developed in addition
to existing / known resources such as voluntary/ community sector (IWAC,
Challenge and Adventure, SOL Ecole),
IOW college and 14-19
Curriculum Strategy to enable true flexible timetables with
individualised learning. |
2. behaviour and behaviour
infrastructure |
Start
September – October 2006 by September 2007 |
School
leadership takes the lead responsibility for tier 1 and 2 actions. Lead
professional role with individuals Teachers
classroom management skills are improved to enable good teaching Cluster
support centres and area behaviour teams are established for tier 3 and 4
actions – linked to whole Island PRU provision Development of a range of sub strategies and tightening or re-writing of protocols- for example Parenting Strategy, Re-integration Protocol (Reintegration of permanently excluded students to take place within the agreed twelve week timescale.) Managed Move Protocol, Anti-bullying Strategy, Teenage
Pregnancy Strategy. Development of collaborations (as required by DfES) Develop system for central monitoring of pupils on flexible
timetables. Roll out of Sentinel software with regard to monitoring (and
researching) bullying and racial incidents. Development of local/cluster units-pilot brought into
operation during academic year 2006-07.
Roll out of others thereafter. Development of separate referral units for medical and KS 1
& 2 Behaviour - as agreed by Cabinet Development of WISE satellites-as agreed by cabinet. Catering venture due on stream Easter
2007. |
||
3. flexible timetables |
end
November 2006 |
All
pupils receive 25 hours tuition All
pupils on flexible timetables are known and the impact of their provision
evaluated – all have a lead professional Advice and Guidance on definition and use of flexible
timetables. Develop system for central monitoring of pupils on flexible
timetables. Note: This links to the general move towards
individualised learning plans for all learners. Possible need to merge IEP’s, PEP’s, PSP’s into one unitary
plan/ document. |
||
4. management of exclusion |
end
December 2006 |
Thresholds
for exclusion consistent in all institutions LIs
focus challenge to re-integration and incidence of re-exclusion Re-integration
is effective for pupils and families – incidence of re-exclusion reduced Tightening or re-writing of Re-integration Protocol Authority to facilitate and Schools to agree and implement it |
||
5. vulnerable groups |
|
The
data infrastructure enables effective tracking of vulnerable individuals Key
needs of individuals are shared across agencies School
leadership engages with the known lead professional and family to match the
education environment to need As in: LAC, Pregnant,
Excluded, Black, Gay, Homeless, Disaffected, Socially Excluded, SEN, Mental
Health Needs. Many of these would have specific policies and plans to
address their needs from across the council. |
Issue 3 |
Develop a monitoring and
evaluation procedure for the Key Stage 3 initiative |
|||
Outcomes |
good added value for all young
people across Key Stage 3 |
|||
Measures of Success |
Meet LAA/BVPI targets for KS3 achievement : July 2007 : 69% Eng 74%
Maths 70%
Science 74%
ICT July 2008 : 72% Eng 76%
Maths 72%
Science 76%
ICT July 2009 : 74% Eng 78%
Maths 74%
Science 78%
ICT |
|||
Actions |
Date |
Who |
Outputs |
Resources |
1.
establish recording system to track and monitor pupil progress across all KS3
schools; |
end
September 2006 |
Council
Secondary
Strategy Manager / Rose Ward, SI |
Consistent
data management system developed across all KS3 schools with appropriate
training identified and delivered |
Members
of School Improvement Team as necessary to include Primary and Secondary
Strategy Consultants Contributions
from Regional National Strategy Advisers Core
activity – in base budget and Strategy Grants; time allocation for meetings
and reporting |
2.
embed KS3 programme in Secondary Strategy action plans |
end
October 2006 |
On
take up of post (01.09.06) new Secondary Strategy Manager to review current
plans |
||
3.
evaluate progress at regular measure points (to be agreed with schools) |
dates
as agreed with Sec Strategy Steering group |
Measure
points to be set at first Autumn meeting of Strategy steering group; Data
analysis at regular measure points to include trends over time and
predictions of grades at final assessment |
||
4. Tighten assessment processes to ensure that the right pupils
are entered for KS3 SATs at the end of Y8. |
|
|
||
5. establish secure differentiated curriculum in Y9 |
|
|
||
6.
report on evaluation to Director at agreed dates |
dates
as agreed |
SSM
& SI to establish and complete regular reporting mechanism |
Issue 4 |
Improve the quality of performance
management by further strengthening service planning and individual appraisal
processes |
|||
Outcomes |
consistently strong individual,
team and service performance to achieve high quality added value for children
and young people across the 5 outcomes |
|||
Measures of Success |
1.
Costed and measurable outcomes enable review of C&YPP progress and value
for money 2.
Use of dataset enables outcomes based QPMR on a quarterly basis 3.
PDR appraisal and review measures individual outcome impact to relevant QPMR
indicators |
|||
Actions |
Date |
Who |
Outputs |
Resources |
1.
collate delivery plans for C&YP Plan |
end
of January 2007 |
Council
Keith
Simmonds, Head of Policy, Planning and Commissioning |
All
actions within the C&YP Plan can be tracked to individual timed and
costed project plans for delivery Focus
to JAR action plan for October 2006 – whole C&YP Plan for January 2007 |
Workforce
re-modelling team Corporate
support team and CORVU performance management team Performance
management training for all £5000 SMT
use of Service Board methodology Contributions
from CSA Adviser External
assessment APA – Audit Commission Member
monitoring and challenge |
2.
set up data management system to collect and analyse full Children’s Services
dataset and balance scorecard |
end
of October 2006 |
CORVU
dataset is operational and known to all team managers All
team managers trained in use and analysis Headlight
indicators established for the Directorate and teams Tracking
frequency of headlight indicators operational |
||
3.
map service and team plan outcomes to C&YPP |
end
November 2006 |
Relationship
of service and team plans to C&YP Plan and JAR AP known Service
and team plans prioritized to achieve JAR AP outcomes |
||
4. participate fully in corporate
performance management arrangements, e.g. Service Boards |
end
January 2007 |
Service
Board methodology established across the Directorate Directorate
action informs corporate and vice versa Actions
can be tracked – audit trail of changes can be evidenced |
||
4.
provide quarterly progress reports on C&YPP outcomes to Children’s Trust
Boards |
end
February 2007 |
Quarterly
performance report methodology effectively used by CT to evaluate and
challenge performance Success
is known weakness addressed |
||
5.
establish individual work programmes which map to service and team plans |
end
November 2006 |
All
individuals in the Directorate know their work programme and its impact on
performance Individual
programmes evaluated for match to key priorities Concept
of regular one to one with managers operational for all |
Issue 5 |
Analyse reported incidents of
racism and provide feedback to schools on the nature of incidents and
resulting action to assist them with prevention |
|||
Outcomes |
a significant reduction in
reported incidents of racism in and out of school |
|||
Measures of Success |
1.Register
of all reported incidents and action taken enables analysis 2.
Analysis of incidents reported as part of QPMR - quarterly to Council and
Directorate SMT 3.
Analysis of repeated incidents against preventative action reported on a six
monthly basis - 5% reduction of incidents in 2007 - 8% in 2008 from 2006 base
line |
|||
Actions |
Date |
Who |
Outputs |
Resources |
1.
mechanism to ensure that all schools
report incidents properly |
end
September 2006 |
Council
Keith
Simmonds, Head of Policy, Planning and Commissioning |
Schools
provide monthly returns LI’s
follow up where returns are not made School
leadership awareness is raised through impact assessment |
Corporate
Diversity Team CS
Equality monitoring group Partner
schools Partner
authorities Partner
agencies - Police |
2. analysis of incidents
undertaken on termly basis and fed back to schools |
end
January 2007 |
Termly
analysis report shared with schools and corporate diversity team Key
actions identified and shared with schools Equality/Diversity
monitoring group provide cross agency forum to support action |
||
3. monitoring in schools by link
inspectors to ensure that analysis is
acted on |
end
January 2006 |
Li’s
follow up all incidents and report school action on NofV This
evidence evaluated to determine good and weak practice |
||
4. monitoring, support and challenge to schools to bring numbers
of reported incidents down |
end
July 2007 |
Impact
assessments completed annually to evidence actions to raise awareness and
reduce incidents Incident
trend and actions annually reported to Members |
Issue 6 |
Strengthen project and programme
management |
|||
Outcomes |
consistently strong project and
programme management whereby projects and programmes are delivered on time,
within budget, to a high quality to achieve high quality added value for
children and young people across the 5 outcomes |
|||
Measures of Success |
1.
Initiation of projects can evidence a sign off process with costed business
plan - reduction in number of projects - outcomes measurable in relevance to
key Council/Directorate objectives 2.
90% of team leaders have PRINCE2 capability by March 2007 3.
Quarterly QPMR monitoring enables business/cost opportunity decisions and
adjustments to be made 4.
Audit on all project completion enables evaluation of impact, lessons learned
- improved business cost analysis - 3% reduction in project costs for higher
outcomes by 2008 |
|||
Actions |
Date |
Who |
Outputs |
Resources |
1. establish clear project and programme
management methodology, based on PRINCE2, differentiated to match the scale
of the project / programme |
|
Council
: Keith
Simmonds, Head of Policy, Planning and Commissioning / Bob Street, HoAudit |
|
|
2. train
key staff in project and programme management |
|
|
||
3.
establish process for prioritisation and approval of projects and build into
the Children and Young People’s Planning process |
|
|
||
4. build the monitoring of project and
programme management into the Council’s performance management arrangements |
|
|
||
5.
provide impact evaluation on project and programme completion |
end
January 2007 |
|
Issue 7 |
Build the capacity of the Children
and Families Division to ensure that child protection cases always have an allocated
social worker |
|||
Outcomes |
all child protection cases have an
allocated social worker |
|||
Measures of Success |
1.
LAA targets 2.
% of children in need re-referred to social care in the last 12 months.
Target 28% by April 2007 3.
% of child protection re-registrations during the year. Target – 14% by April
2007 4.
% of parents 3-19 year olds aware of / accessing parental support initiatives Local
Target 5.
Weekly monitoring of case load no unallocated cases identified by end August
2006 |
|||
Actions |
Date |
Who |
Outputs |
Resources |
1.
review all team remits and case load capacity |
end
August 2006 |
Council
Prue
Grimshaw, HoCF; Liz Harkin,
Safeguarding Manager |
Review eligibility criteria in
line with ECM. Ensure all CIN in need of safeguarding have an allocated
social worker including children with a disability. Securing timely
assessment to inform safe and appropriate closure after meeting need in line
with the development of Lead Professional and CAF and Pathway Planning |
Multi-agency /interdisciplinary
training across specialist, targeted, universal services inc voluntary sector
supported by Workforce re-modeling
team. Children’s
Trust management teams. Community/Schools
pilot project team. Members,
Council, Children’s Trust management teams/Local Preventative Strategy Service
Managers JC &LAC/ Family Services/QA. |
2.
review service area structure and thresholds |
end
December 2006 |
Identify most appropriate
structure aligned to service need incorporating the development of Lead
Professional/CAF & Pathway Planning in order to support all identified
vulnerable children especially those with a LDD or complex need. To reduce
need for targeted service provision by ensuring robust universal services in
place. |
||
3.
implement a recruitment and retention drive |
end
October 2006 |
Recruit appropriately experienced
qualified staff with a view to the development of frontline
integrated/multi-agency teams. Review re-instigation of recruitment and
retention forum. |
||
4.
improve timescales of core assessments /care plans & planning by weekly
monitoring of data reports |
end
August 2006 |
Review of current process to reduce
bureaucracy and that all professionals involved with Core Assessments/care
plans ensure ownership to improve outcomes for C&YP. |
Issue 8 |
Ensure that childhood immunization
rates are improved |
|||
Outcomes |
Maximum
number of children immunized |
|||
Measures of Success |
Increase
in children who have first MMR by 2nd birthday in line with
government criteria |
|||
Actions |
Date |
Who |
Outputs |
Resources |
Rigorous
campaign including school nurses, midwifes and health visitors, GPs. IW
Campaign including simulated model of an outbreak and affect on Isle of Wight Lists
of children not immunized given to professionals |
1%
increase year on year |
Director
of Public Health Rachel
Hayes PCT |
Immunisations
available through Children’s Centres Training for child minders in cycle of change
techniques to promote uptake Local
media campaign with the VCS, the Isle of Wight College, NCT, pre and post
natal classes, Neighbourhood Nurseries and preschools |
|
Issue 9 |
Develop a strategy and a delivery
plan to ensure that the CAMHS meet the needs of children and young people |
|||
Outcomes |
Improve the emotional well being
and mental health of children and young people |
|||
Measures of Success |
Performance
indicators agreed and in place across the Preventative strategy including:
|
|||
Actions |
Date |
Who |
Outputs |
Resources |
1.Current
strategy until October 2006 2006
– 2007 under development 2.
Awareness campaigns including World Mental Health Day and launch of the
revised action plan at the Director of Head teachers conference on parenting 3.
Tier 1 Pilot of Social and Emotional Aspects of Learning (SEAL) funding
applied for to roll out to all schools 4.
Tier 1 training as part of induction and Common Core Skills and as part of PDR
for universal services including primary care teams, Children’s Centres,
Healthy Schools and Extended Schools in recognizing early signs of mental ill
health 5.
Tier 2 identify services that have a role to play in delivering Tier 2
services and make the accountability explicit 6.
Develop directory of services for comprehensive CAMHS to facilitate
appropriate and timely signposting to services (direct link to the Local
Preventative Strategy and priority 2 in the Children and Young People’s Plan 7.
Tier 3 Develop step down provision with care pathways / continuing provision
for young people to leave Tier 4 and Tier 3 services as part of a recovery
model. To include private providers as well as Leigh House, acute emergency
provision and forensics. Explore links to development of mentoring with
Voluntary sector and Connexions to re integrate back into school and local
community 8.
Implement Early Interventions in Psychosis Service 9.
Implement transition policy for young people moving to adult services 10.
Tier 4 Develop capacity to provide day provision, outreach and training for
sevenacre staff in child and
adolescent acute mental health |
Launch
October 2006 |
Clinical
Director of CAMHS Rachel
Hayes PCT / Simon Dear, CT Manager |
· Training on child
development delivered to all clusters and revisited regularly · Promotion of
Communicating Matters · Development of the Early
Identification Projects (Multi agency) ·
Developing relationships between parents/carers and young children
(evidenced in reduced referral to Behaviour support and/or CAMHS, improvement
in Foundation Stage Profile (FSP)) ·
Developing communication skills and interaction (links with
relationships) measured with Sure Start language measure and reduced referrals
to Speech and Language Therapy ·
The core offer within Children’s Centres is dynamically pro active.
The outcomes have been designated by DfES together with the list of desirable
outcomes in the Children’s Centre Strategy · The Core Professional
Purpose and the principles of the Early Years Service are the drivers for the
pro active work of the service. The Development plan has outcomes which,
again, may offer some insight to DfES on how things will impact and make a
difference ·
Social and Emotional Aspects of Learning in all schools · Progression of Extended
Schools programme Wave 2 training (21 schools =30%. In total +78% trained) and Wave 3 training (15 schools
=22%. In total 100% trained) |
Incorporate
launch with the Director of Head teachers conference on parenting Funding
bid submitted to roll out SEAL programme to all schools Develop
funding opportunities with VCS to provide interagency training and workforce
development Develop
more formal links with Hampshire Children’s Trust pathfinder (Comp CAMHS
focus) Incorporate
into the development of the Directory of Children’s Services building on
Children’s Information Service and Information Sharing and Assessment
investment South
central Strategic Health Authority exploring most effective use of step down
provision across Hampshire and the Isle of Wight |
Issue 10 |
Develop and implement a
comprehensive preventative strategy |
|||
Outcomes |
Overall
reduction of referrals to Tier 3 and Tier 4 services and an overall increase
in access to Tier 1 preventative services and Tier 2 early intervention
services |
|||
Measures of Success |
1. Prevention performance indicators agreed through
the LAA and in place across the preventative strategy/C&YP Plan 2. Agreed
working model of evaluation of prevention and early intervention in operation 3. Performance management of the preventative
strategy in operation through CorVu and reported regularly through the
Children and Young People’s Trust -
the top 10 – 15 indicators that provide a monthly assessment of progress in delivering
the Local Preventative Strategy |
|||
Actions |
Date |
Who |
Outputs |
Resources |
1.
Update existing preventative strategy 2004-2005 with audit and map of
existing services across the Tiers including the identification of gaps in
Tier 2 in the management of chronic disease |
1st
January 2007 |
Children’s
Trust Board / Council Prue
Grimshaw, HoCF / Rachel Hayes PCT / Simon Dear, CT Manager |
Each
member of staff, volunteers, Parish and Town Councils have a copy of the
preventative strategy and understand the role they play in prevention. Production
of Directory of services to enable effective signposting to the appropriate
service |
All
services, staff, budgets and resources within the remit of the Children and
Young People’s Trust Develop
further the capacity building support within the Voluntary and Community
Sector through the service level agreement with the Rural Community Council.
The further development of the Children, Young People and Families VCS
Network as part of the Council for Voluntary Services Establish
link to academic institution to provide information advice and guidance on
research and evidence base in prevention Seek
mentoring support from the Public Health
Observatory Establish
buddying support with a Beacon Council on prevention Join
a LGA IDEA network to provide a critical friend role Support
increase in staff achieving Masters qualifications in public health and
health promotion |
2.
Revise needs assessment Review
literature for evidence-base for prevention
- do this now so that we can list
things we can actually do in this action plan |
1st
January 2007 |
All
preventative and targeted services have clear stated aims, objectives, needs
assessment and cited evidence base of how they with parental support provide
Tier 1 and 2 services and that this is communicated to those receiving each
service. Co-ordination
of Tier 1 and 2 services so the right children and young people access the
right services. Define
accountability of Tier 1 and 2 services of their preventative role |
||
3.
Undertake a local cost/benefit analysis to quantify returns (both financial
and quality of life added) in investment in prevention - |
1st
January 2008 |
The
preventative strategy is underpinned by a clear financial strategy that
identifies savings in a reduction in the use of Tier 3 and 4 services and how
these savings are reinvested into Tier 1 and 2 services |
||
4.
Instigate action plans for delivery of preventative strategy 2006 to 2009 Need
to unpack the 2004/5 preventative strategy to identify different work-streams
which will actually develop preventative and early intervention
services; these should be listed as
the identified actions. Need
to include a lot from the parent and family support strategy Make
explicit the role the voluntary and community sector (VCS) and independent
and private providers play in prevention Build
further capacity in the VCS Train
and support Tier 2 workers to identify and develop packages of care and
support for families in a co-ordinated and integrated way. Develop
Tier 2 services to generate Common Assessment Framework and develop Tier 3
services to receive these CAFs. |
1st
January 2007 |
These
impacts need to be more closely related to the particular actions proposed · Increase in the
attainment of children and young people at all key stages · Increase in number of
children and young people who access services, including schools and are
included in activities · Decrease in incidents
of bullying and racist incidents · Reduction of children
on the Child Protection Register through an increase in families accessing
parenting education and support · Increase in child
immunization rates · Decrease in the number
of children and young people who require Tier 3 and 4 specialist Child and
Adolescent Mental health Services · Increase in young
people in education training or employment · Increase in number of
families in suitable accommodation and young people in supported or semi
independent housing · Increase in numbers of
young people accessing sexual health programmes · Reduction in the number
of conceptions in young people aged under 18 years · Decrease in missing,
decayed and filled teeth through the oral health promotion programme · Decrease in young
people receiving final warnings through the Early Interventions Service · Halt/Decrease (check
LAA) in obesity through the Community Chef programme as part of the Healthy
Eating Alliance and Healthy Schools Standard · Increase in the
educational achievement of looked after children who are supported by the
Looked After Children’s Education Service · Increase in the educational
achievement of Young Carers · Increase in the number
of families that receive support where one or more parents misuse substances |
||
5.
Provide training in health promotion and prevention as part of common core
skills for workforce development |
1st
January 2007 |
· Every induction for new
staff includes health promotion training. · The PDR states and
meets the training needs for individuals around health promotion. · The training programme
for common core skills includes health promotion training, early intervention,
Lead Professional role and is open to the voluntary and community sector why
all health promotion ? there is a lot
more to prevention than this… |
Issue 11 Is really a sub-set
of Point 2 |
Review procedures for the
reintegration of pupils out of schools to ensure earlier reintegration and
effective support on entry to high schools |
|||
Outcomes |
the successful reintegration of
previously excluded young people into mainstream schooling |
|||
Measures of Success |
1.
No pupil out of school for more than one year by April 2007 2.
Average time before re-integration to school 3 months by September 2007 3.
Pupils re-excluded reduced by 3% in 2007 and by 10% in 2008 from 2006
baseline |
|||
Actions |
Date |
Who |
Outputs |
Resources |
1.
Review current procedures Can we see
here and know what needs to be changed ?
if so, put this into the action plan |
end
September 2006 |
Council
Keith
Simmonds, HoLE, / Doug Wright, Access and Inclusion Officer |
Tightening or re-writing of Re-integration Protocol Reinstate the Managed Move Protocol between high schools and
extend it formally to middle and primary (already used informally) Schools agreed and implementing it Development of collaborations (as required by DfES) |
Development of local/cluster units to deal with learners who
are exhibiting disaffection or have 5 days or more of exclusion. An effective Parenting Strategy and access to parenting groups
at local level. Use of Youth Centres and Youth Service in flexible timetabling
arrangements. Staff and financial resources for the six month support
plan. (What happens after six months if say the one to one support
ends, but the pupil still needs it?) Further resources need to be identified/developed in addition
to existing / known resources such as voluntary/ community sector (IWAC,
Challenge and Adventure, SOL Ecole),
IOW college and 14-19
Curriculum Strategy to enable true flexible timetables with individualised learning. CAMHS/ISS type resources extended, but with swifter turn
around of cases. Linked to SEAL and Healthy Schools work. Resources to set up the units. Qualified and trained staff. Link Inspectors already in place-change of role and outlook? |
2.
Establish all partner agreement to revised procedures – don’t we want to get all schools signing up to taking their share of
excluded pupils (even ‘full’ schools) ? |
Will not get all school agreement by end November 2006!! |
Need a system whereby Aided schools (for example Trinity, ABK)
also take their share. Current
legislation does not allow for this. Full schools can be directed to take a Perm. Ex. (unless it would exceed 30 in Primary 1) |
||
3.
all pupils and parents provided with a six month support plan on
re-integration – yes Could be too
ambitious to be resourced! (Three months seems
more achievable/realistic.) |
end
January 2007 |
Need to develop school based skills (and individualised
learning plans) along with use of local units. This should both reduce the number of learners reaching Perm.
Ex. and act as a part of the re-entry strategy. |
||
what action can we propose that
makes reintegration happen quickly ? |
|
The local authority needs to be more directive and use its
powers not only to get schools to admit the excluded learner, but accept that
it is their responsibility to nurture and ensure they survive there! |
||
what package of measures can we
put in place (in the PRU?) so that the pupil is equipped to return to
mainstream and stay there ? Cannot undo years of poor parenting in five seconds! PRU’s already offer many packages of measures. |
|
Intensive Literacy (and Numeracy) Programme-as many excluded
pupils have poor levels of literacy or numeracy, which makes accessing the
curriculum difficult. Self esteem building / emotional literacy Input from outside agencies, ‘Get Sorted’, Community Police,
School Nurse Drop in. Possibly the ‘advice’ from the PRU on how to successfully
re-integrate the learner having a greater weight than ‘advice’. Many of the excluded pupils would survive better in mainstream
school with individualised timetable around subjects/activities that motivate
them, in smaller groups with more one to one support. However, not as simple as that. Some pupils will never manage in mainstream school. Need to develop more effective CAMHS and
ISS type resources, with instant/early access. |
||
Development of Nurture Units in primary schools. |
|
Preventative, early intervention for targeted/identified young
people. |
||
Development of lead Professional role. Development of Link Inspectors into Cluster Co-ordinators (as
School Improvement Partners demises their current role). |
|
Resources and inputs for families and young people more
effectively targeted. |
Issue 12 |
Complete
the implementation of the 14-19 strategy and Learner Entitlement in
conjunction with stakeholders |
|||
Outcomes |
|
|||
Measures of Success |
1. Targets for participation, retention and achievement, within
14-19 action plan and LAA are met. 2. Increased
mixed L2/3 vocational /academic courses from 2006 on offer. 3. 10% reduction in small post 16
groups (below 10 students) from 2006 baseline by September 2007 4. GCSE
performance indicators in line with LAA targets by 2009 5. A/AVCE
points score in line with national position by 2010 6. Reduction
in NEET to meet 2009 LAA target 7. Learner
surveys indicate satisfaction at securing first choice of courses is above
85% by 2007 – 90% by 2008. 8. Value added indicators from KS3
to 4 and from KS4 to KS5 are satisfactory or better. |
|||
Actions |
Date |
Who |
Outputs |
Resources |
1.
Implement a good practice dissemination strategy with all partners to ensure
wide understanding of the success criteria for the learner entitlement and
focused work to expand the range of courses available to learners. |
end
October 2006 |
Council
Jackie
Boxx, Inspector with responsibility for 14-19 Jackie
Boxx, Inspector
with responsibility for 14-19 Jackie
Boxx, Inspector
with responsibility for 14-19 |
Outline
strategy including marketing and distribution, produced and distributed to
key providers for comment. Strategy
with implementation timetable agreed. All
the strategic 14-19 groups and young people’s groups have received a
presentation on and publications relating to the Strategy and the learner
Entitlement. 90%
of high school staff sampled are familiar with the aims of the strategy. 90%+
of Y9 and Y11 learners sampled have received a copy of the Learner
Entitlement by December 2006 and know the process for making a complaint if
not receiving their entitlement. 100%
of learners who complain are satisfied with the remedial action taken. |
Printing
and distribution costs(PIAP) 14-19
Consultants |
2.
Establish a monitoring cycle to impact and measure the outcomes of the
learner entitlement delivery. |
end
November 2006 |
Methodology
and timetable for collecting evidence agreed, including the use of the quality
framework and toolkit. Full
arrangements in place. Termly
report on the quality and range of provision in 2 providers. Annual
report on the change in provision produced. |
Time
from 14-19 quality consultant. |
|
3.
Establish a support structure between the college, WBL and the two school
hubs for implementation of the specialized diplomas. |
end
October 2006 |
14-19
coordinator post confirmed. Schedule
of curriculum consortium meetings set up to integrate with 14-19 Provider
Group timetable. Work
plan of the coordinator agreed based on the requirements of the ’14-19
progress checks’ and timeframe associated with piloting the specialized
diplomas. Partnership
working is developed to pilot the specialist diploma. |
Time
from the 14-19 consultant. |
|
4.
Ensure the publication of high quality information leaflets and a programme
of guidance events. |
End
November 2006 and annually |
Connexions |
Focus
group of learners’ views on key publications are collated and used to revise
key publications. Choices
leaflet revised, published and distributed to all Y9 and Y11 learners. Connexions
organize annual 14-19 Guidance event and increasing numbers of learners
attend, including those vulnerable groups who are supported to attend. 14-19
consultants to attend all Y9 and Y11 options evenings. |
Time
from 14-19 Consultant. Publication
costs. |
5.
Develop the on-line area prospectus and common application processes. |
End
July 2007 |
14-19
Consultant |
Process
trialled with a cross section of provider details. System
ready to be fully implemented by April 2007. Awareness
raising campaign completed regarding launch. |
Time
from 14-19 Consultant. |
6.
Implement an annual cycle of quality inspections for level 2 vocational
provision, based on learner voice. |
July
2007 |
Jackie
Boxx |
Annual
report on the quality of teaching and learning supports decisions on the
location of provision. Training
programme constructed to target and improve the skills of key staff. Improved
judgements regarding the quality of teaching and learning on vocational
courses. Learner
satisfaction and achievements on courses increase. |
Time
from 14-19 Consultants |
Issue 13 |
Integrate management information
systems of all partners |
|||
Outcomes |
All the Children’s Trust partners’
management information can be brought together to support integrated services
to support the needs of individual children and young people. |
|||
Measures of Success |
1.
90%-95% data accuracy levels established in key data sets by January 2007 2.
5% reduction in systems down time by July 2007 from2006 baseline integrated
child identifier allows 3.
90% accuracy match by January 2007 4.
90% of operational staff with refreshed training by July 2007 |
|||
Actions |
Date |
Who |
Outputs |
Resources |
1.
Audit and establish an action plan to achieve DfES phase 2 requirements by
January 2007 –
|
end
July 2006 |
Children’s
Trust Keith
Simmonds, HoPPC / Info Sharing Manager |
|
|
2.
review SIMS/EMS and Anite data input and accuracy levels – yes |
end
November 2006 |
|
||
3.
Establish effective systems support infrastructure – any examples of what this might entail ? |
end
November 2006 |
|
||
4.
establish integrated child identifier/flagging fields across all partners - yes |
end
October 2006 |
|
Issue 14 |
Review
the curriculum offer to ensure an appropriate balance of academic and
vocational provision post-16 |
|||
Outcomes |
|
|||
Measures of Success |
1.
Increased mixed L2/3 vocational /academic courses from 2006. 2.
10% reduction in small post 16 groups (below 10 students) from 2006 baseline
by September 2007 3.
16-19 capacity position resolved in principle by December 2006 4.
GCSE performance indicators in line with LAA targets by 2009 5.
A/AVCE points score in line with national position by 2010 |
|||
Actions |
Date |
Who |
Outputs |
Resources |
1.
Implement the 14-19 curriculum entitlement offer ensuring the expansion of
the vocational options available. |
end
September 2006 |
Council Keith
Simmonds, Head of Policy, Planning and Commissioning / Jackie
Boxx, Inspector with responsibility for 14-19 Council Keith
Simmonds, Head of Policy, Planning and Commissioning |
Senior
leaders in schools understand the requirements of the curriculum entitlement. Meetings
take place to support curriculum planning across the hubs, including common
timetabling. Scrutiny
of curriculum plans within schools and across the hubs develops provision Annual
data report show increases in vocational course take-up |
Time
from 14-19 coordinator. |
2.
Consult on LSC proposals for 16-19 provision |
end
October 2006 |
LSC
proposal received. Methodology
and timescale of consultation process agreed. Consultation
completed. Collation
of feedback from all 14-19 stakeholders discussed and recommendations
proposed. Council
decision on LSC proposal. |
||
3.
Council decision on BSF one pathfinder school |
end
October 2006 |
Paper
on options for the pathfinder school produced for discussion. Collation
of views from providers. Recommendation(s)
proposed. Decision
made. |
||
4.
Rationalisation of secondary
provision and curriculum |
from
September 2008 |
Rationalization
of provision. |
||
5.
Curriculum provision for each hub is funded based on quality. |
From
September 2007 and then annual cycle. |
LSC
& Jackie Boxx |
Value
added analysis, scrutiny of performance data and quality reviews are used to
identify high and low quality provision. Curriculum
hubs to submit plans for 2007 post 16 curriculum offer for approval by 14-19
Executive group in January 2007. Provision located and funded only for courses of
high quality. |
Time
from 14-19 consultants |
6.
Provision of a learner adviser in each school to ensure learners are on
appropriate courses and receiving the support to achieve. |
From
September 2007 |
Jackie
Boxx, 14-19 responsibility |
Curriculum
choices being offered for KS4 learners are scrutinized against prior data and
learner preferences and feedback to curriculum managers in spring term. A
‘counselling’ session is available for learners and their parents about
suitability of course selection. |
One
day per week from 14-19 consultants |
Issue 15 |
Increase the range of suitable
accommodation for families, young people and those who may require semi
independent or supported housing |
|||
Outcomes |
all young people are properly
housed, including those who need semi-independent or supported housing |
|||
Measures of Success |
LAA
targets 1.
Households in temporary accommodation
Target – 320 by April 2007 2.
Average time spent in temporary accommodation Target 48 weeks by April 2007 3.
Homelessness Target – 260 by April 2007 4.
No of units of affordable housing per year Target – 220 by April 2007 5.
% of children in need re-referred to social care in the last 12 months.
Target 28% by April 2007 6.
reduction in eviction rates by cross-service effective application of
benefits - 5% by July 2007 from 2006 baseline |
|||
Actions |
Date |
Who |
Outputs |
Resources |
Are these the right 5 actions to
solve the problem ? |
|
|
|
|
1.
implement with Council and voluntary partners a Dispersed Housing Scheme for
young people |
end
January 2007 |
Council
Mary
Brimson, LAC manager / Phil Taylor, Housing Manager |
|
|
2.
establish a cross cutting panel to monitor and performance manage the
strategic actions to address young people’s housing needs. |
end
November 2006 |
|
||
3.
Put in place supported move-on accommodation for care leavers and other
vulnerable young people. |
end
March 2007 |
|
||
4.
Agree with partners a prioritisation system to ensure that the needs of
vulnerable families in unsuitable accommodation are reflected on the Joint
Housing Register. |
end
January 2007 |
|
||
5.
monitor the eviction rates and
patterns of eviction for vulnerable young people and families |
end
January 2007 |
|
Issue 16 |
Ensure that sexually transmitted
infection rates for under 16s and 16-19 years are monitored and the delivery
of sexual health programmes evaluated in response |
|||
Outcomes |
A sharp reduction in sexually
transmitted infections for those under 19 |
|||
Measure of Success |
1.
Promotion of Chlamydia testing April 2007 2.
1st year 30% 16-25 year olds tested 2007-2008 3.
2nd year 50% 16-25 year olds tested 2008-2009 |
|||
Actions |
Date |
Who |
Outputs |
Resources |
1.
Implement annual monitoring reports of infections rates to the Children’s
Trust |
March
2007. |
Director
of Public Health Rachel
Hayes PCT/ Children’s Trust Commissioner |
Accurate
knowledge and understanding of the current situation for the young people of
the Isle of Wight Implementation
of Chlamydia Screening in April 2007 (which may result in a rise in detection
which will enable us to have a better overview of the extent of the pool of
infection) |
Choosing
Health money. Teenage
pregnancy Strategy. |
2.
Review teenage pregnancy strategy in line with government NICE guidelines. |
June
2007. |
Response
to the NICE guidelines. |
||
3.Maintain
and review of activities in place to raise awareness. |
June
2007. |
Evaluation
of the activities in place to raise awareness. |
||
4.
Review access to GUM services. |
June
2007 |
|
Understanding
of needs in the community for access to the service. |
|