PAPER A
POLICY COMMISSION MEETING
Meeting |
Children and School Results Commission |
Ref |
CPC |
Date |
|
Place |
Council Chamber, County Hall, |
Purpose of meeting |
Formal public meeting |
Attendance |
Commission members – Cllrs Apologies – Cllr Muriel Miller Cabinet member – Cllr Patrick Joyce Cabinet Secretaries – Cllrs David Pugh, Alan Wells Officers – Mr Steve Beynon, Mr Paul Thistlewood Learning and Skills Council – Mr Phillip Walker and Mr Phil Higgins Other members present – Cllrs
Vanessa Churchman, Jonathan Fitzgerald-Bond, |
Agenda Items |
|
1.
Notes
of previous meeting |
The notes of the meeting held on 6 December 2006 were agreed. |
1.
Declarations
of interest |
Cllr G Kennett declared a personal
interest as her daughter was employed at Cllr D Gardiner declared a personal interest due to her employment by Unison. |
2.
Investing
in the Island’s Future C1/06 – 14 to 19 Strategy |
Papers considered :- Report of the Learning and Skills Council and draft Blue Paper. 1)
Report on the Learning and Skills Council’s
Public Information Events Mr Walker congratulated the Policy Commission on the way it
conducted its enquiry into a sensitive and complex issue. He indicated that
the needs of the An outline was given of the LSC’s 6 information evenings on its proposed 6th Form Centre and the key advantages and disadvantages that were highlighted by those that had attended. Mr Walker clarified that if the 6th Form Centre was not proceeded with the LSC would still be looking to invest £10m on new buildings at the College site to replace some that were not fit for purpose. 2) Blue
Paper on the Enquiry into 6th Form Provision on the Members
discussed the draft Blue Paper which, if approved would, be submitted to the
Cabinet Member for consideration by the Cabinet at its meeting on Mr Beynon advised
on several slight amendments to the content of the draft paper. He reminded
members of the briefing session on It was very clear that if the LSC’s proposal was rejected there was still a need to identify a way forward that would not only enable the island to deliver the Government’s expectations but more critically ensure that attainment levels were improved especially at Key Stages 3, 4 and 5. One objective identified through the consultation process related to the responsibility for delivering Key Stage 3. This was currently split between Middle Schools and High Schools. It was believed by a number of stakeholders that Middle Schools should retain year 9 pupils and this should assist in pushing up attainment levels in that Key Stage. The
importance of educating pupils within their local community had been
highlighted. Mr Beynon indicated that the previous attempt at collaboration
between High Schools and the College had not been successful. If such
arrangements were placed on a formal basis this would enable the An explanation was given of how the High schools could work together with the College and in particular the governance arrangements for this which was a vital element of a sustainable development. The 3 options which had been identified as part of an alternative strategy for post 16 education would, if approved by the Cabinet, be the subject of a further, more sharper, consultation process before a final decision was taken by the Council. It was therefore recommended to the Cabinet Member for Education, Skills and Learning that based on the content of the Blue Paper :- The LSC
proposal is rejected in its current form and that an alternative proposal is
offered which seeks to create a new arrangement for 14-19 provision on the |