PAPER B
RESOURCES SELECT COMMITTEE - 7 APRIL 2005 OFFICE ACCOMMODATION RATIONALISATION PHASE III REPORT OF THE
PORTFOLIO HOLDER FOR RESOURCES |
REASON FOR SELECT
COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION
To provide the Select Committee with information as to the progress of
Council office space rationalisation and improvements including details of
Engineering Services’ move to Enterprise House.
ACTION REQUIRED BY THE SELECT COMMITTEE That the Select Committee supports the progress being made with the
Council’s office space rationalisation. |
BACKGROUND
1.
Members will
recall that in June 2002 a series of proposals were recommended to the
Executive from Select Committee following extensive work by Members and
Officers of the Property Task Group.
The acceptance of these recommendations subject to minor variations has
been the foundation of the Council’s office accommodation rationalisation.
2.
In the case of
Enterprise House further reports dated 21 May 2003 and 21 May 2004 outlined the
potential for letting the property which was not concluded and then the taking
of a Lease at a reduced rent for the Council’s own use.
3.
All these
papers will be available for circulation at the meeting or in advance should
Members so require. Furthermore details
of the strategy behind the office changes is
available in a presentation format and this presentation could also be
made at the Committee meeting should Members so wish.
4.
Members will
also recall that the Select Committee put forward its recommendations including
the proposal that the budget for office rationalisation shall be ring-fenced
and that outcomes should in effect be self-financing. The capital balance sheet currently estimated as follows:
Expenditure |
|
|
Receipts |
|
Balance |
Somerton Stores |
741,000 |
|
Forest Road |
375,000 |
|
Enterprise House |
257,000 |
|
8A Clarence Road |
83,000 |
|
Jubilee Stores |
75,000 |
|
Parkhurst Library HQ |
900,000 |
|
Westridge |
460,000 |
|
St Nicholas House |
850,000 |
|
Northwood House |
117,000 |
|
17 Quay Street |
250,000 |
|
|
1,650,000 |
|
|
2,458,000 |
808,000 |
5.
Turning
specifically to the move of Engineering Services, the whole of the cost is
within budget and is covered by the ring-fenced accommodation review receipts.
Enterprise House |
|
Fibre Optic Network |
101,419 |
ICT Works |
89,332 |
Building adaptations |
29,361 |
Security, floors and blinds |
9,495 |
Stamp Duty |
13,386 |
Design, removal and legal costs |
13,392 |
|
256,385 |
6.
For Members’
clarification over £100,000 of the costs described under the Enterprise House
heading were actually incurred prior to the Engineering Service move and independently
of that move. This cost relates to
strategic ICT spending to link the Council’s property and other agencies to the
Council’s ICT network.
7.
In detailed
terms a situation arose presenting an opportunity whereby with the construction
of the new roundabout for B&Q the Council was able to achieve a
multi-functional cabling link to various services including County Hall, St
Mary’s Hospital, the Supporting People Team, AVT and Enterprise House at a cost
of £101,000. This cost was much less
than the quotation by the private BT contractor that amounted to £230,000 for a
five year service connection.
8.
Given this
saving, heads of service took the opportunity to install the infrastructure at
the lesser cost.
9.
Following on
later with the Council taking a new lease of Enterprise House once a reduced
rent had been agreed then all the ICT costs that support various service users
and organisations have been put to the Accommodation Review Budget for funding
from capital income.
10.
More details of
the office rationalisation in terms of revenue and overall floor space will
also be available for Members if required.
RELEVANT PLANS,
POLICIES, STRATEGIES AND PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
See Accommodation Review Phase III dated 5 June 2002.
The stakeholders in this case include Council services, partner
organisations and heads of service, all of whom have been consulted.
FINANCIAL, LEGAL,
CRIME AND DISORDER IMPLICATIONS
The actions taken in this case have been based on operational decisions
made by heads of service and within budget.
There are no discernable crime and disorder implications in this case
and the link to St Mary’s Hospital has enabled the development of that
partnership.
APPENDICES
ATTACHED
None.
The
following papers will be available for circulation at the meeting:
Executive
Paper dated 5 June 2002
Executive
Paper dated 21 May 2003
Delegated
Decision Paper dated 21 May 2004
Contact Point : Tony
Flower, Head of Property Services, ( 823263, e-mail tony.flower@iow.gov.uk
REG BARRY
Portfolio Holder
for Resources