|
Service
Area: Select Committee and Best Value Support
Produced
by: Alistair R Drain
Phone
Number: (82)3801
Location:
County Hall
Date
completed: August 2003
Services
covered: Select Committees and Best Value
Contents:
Service Plan Summary, Structure and Budget, Previous Year’s Improvement Plan,
Key Objectives, Key Performance Measures, Service Improvement Plan,
Consultation, Resource Bids
1.Service
Plan Summary-2004/05
1.
Improving health, housing and the quality of life for all
2.
Encouraging job creation and economic prosperity
3.
Raising education standards and promoting lifelong learning
4.
Creating safe and crime-free communities
5.
Improving public transport and the highways infrastructure
6.
Protecting the Island’s physical environment
In addition these are specific commitments from the
Annual Action Statement
7.
Strong, political and managerial leadership
8.
Strategically driven excellence in Service delivery
9.
Improving a community focus
10.
Organisational improvement and staff development
The numbers used to indicate the Council’s corporate
objectives and commitments are used throughout this Service Plan for reference
purposes.
Directorate & Service
Corporate Services Directorate
Select Committee and Best Value
Support
OUR AIM: To
lead effective, successful and influential Select Committees and Best Value
Reviews where efficiency, improvements and accountability are maximised.
The Select Committee Support team works specifically
with the Select Committee Chairmen, Members and Officers to achieve an
effective, successful and vigorous challenge of Council policies and
services. The Best Value team works
with Officers, union representatives, Members and the Executive to provide
consistently high quality support to the Council and services undergoing Best
Value Reviews. The 6 Select Committees
work to their own individually determined workplan and together with
undertaking their own investigations and monitoring the Council’s Forward Plan,
hold the Executive to account in this way.
Best Value review programme is carried out in line
with Government legislations and to support the service during the period of
their review, through Appraisal Groups and the formulation of ‘SMART’ service
improvement plans. Best Value review
improvement plans are monitored by the relevant Select Committee.
The Select Committee model is based upon the
Parliamentary framework, which enables the service to operate independently
within the Council structure.
The Select Committee and Best Value Unit’s workload
is extremely varied, cross cutting and
reflects Member priorities and the Community Plan. To this end it contributes to each of the six corporate
objectives and commitment to improved Corporate Governance.
Critical Success Factors (from section 4c)
Factor |
Achieved through |
Reported as |
Better
Corporate Policies |
Effective
scrutiny by Select Committee |
|
Providing better services for the public |
Adoption of Best Value Improvement Plans |
|
A
‘Listening Council’ |
Greater
public involvement and engagement at meetings/reviews |
|
|
|
|
Achievement |
Target Date |
Date Achieved |
Comments |
Hold
Select Committee workshops |
Feb 03 |
Mar 03 |
Comprehensive
workplans developed |
Development
of Select Committee Workplans |
Feb 03 |
Mar 03 |
Member
driven |
Align
BV pogramme with Corporate priorities |
|
|
|
Implement
Training Programme for Members on Health Scrutiny |
Nov 02 |
Feb 03 |
To
incorporate fact finding visits, workshops and developing scrutiny |
Implement
training programme for officers |
Dec 02 |
Apr 03 |
Developed
Section Training Plan |
Develop
new report format for Select Committees |
Dec 02 |
Nov 02 |
Implemented |
Develop
intranet pages |
Jan 03 |
Feb 03 |
Operational |
Develop
website and scrutiny notice board |
Sept 03 |
|
Requirement
for ICT time. |
Accommodation
move |
Jan
03 |
July
03 |
Operational |
Implement
Health Scrutiny |
Jan 03 |
Apr 03 |
Ongoing
work |
Improve
support to Select Committees |
Feb 03 |
Feb 03 |
New
Research Officer appointed |
Deliver
Best Value Programme 02/03 |
Mar 03 |
Apr 03 |
Ongoing |
Ensure
Best Value pump priming bids are included in budget process 03/03 |
Mar 03 |
Apr 03 |
Budget
changed to ‘invest to save’ |
Update
BV process and guidance |
Mar 03 |
Mar 03 |
Included
within intranet site |
Better
involvement of Directors, Heads of Service and Members in each review |
Mar 03 |
|
Partly
achieved |
Include
external challenge in all Best Value Reviews |
Mar 03 |
Mar 03 |
Achieved |
Establish
Joint Health Committee, Hampshire and Isle of Wight |
Sept 03 |
Sept 03 |
Work
with other unitary authorities within the region |
Achieve
IIP accreditation |
July 03 |
July 03 |
Section
accredited |
Develop
closer working with PCT |
Sept 03 |
|
Contractual
agreement with PCT |
Key achievements from 2003/04 (from section 3):
2. Structure and
Budget 2004-05
Team |
Workforce
(FTE) |
Staff
Costs (£) |
Other
costs (£) |
Select Committee Support |
6.5 |
£159,255 |
£28,937 |
Best Value |
4 |
£145,472 |
£9,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key Partners:
Primary Care Trust
St Mary’s Trust
Strategic Health Authority
Audit Commission
Accommodation:
Suite of offices, fourth floor,
County Hall
3. Previous Year’s Improvement Plan (to section 1 – summary)
Task |
Target Date |
Outcome |
Achieved & Comments |
Corporate Objective |
Achieve
IIP |
Jun
03 |
Staff
Ownership |
August
03 |
All |
Hold
Select Committee workshops |
Jan
03 |
Member
Ownership |
Completed,
Workplans produced |
All |
Prepare
Select Committee Workplans |
Aug
03 |
Planned
programme of work |
Complete |
All |
Deliver
Best Value Review Programme 2003/04 |
Ongoing |
SMART
Improvement Plans |
Take
to appropriate Select Committee |
All |
Undertake
survey of Best Value Review stakeholders |
Apr
03 |
Review
procedures |
Completed |
All |
Undertake
survey of Select Committee stakeholders |
May
03 |
Review
procedures |
Completed |
All |
Review
Select Committee Procedure Rules |
Sept
03 |
|
|
All |
4. Key Peformance Measures
·
SCUBG – South Coast
Unitaries Benchmarking Group
· NUBG – New Unitaries Benchmarking Group: TQ – Top Quartile
· Stakeholder questionnaires
· External Best Value Inspection
· 80% of all Select Committee recommendations to be actioned by the Executive
· No. of reports prepared by Select Committees presented to the Executive
4a. Key Objectives of Service 2004/5, 2005/06,
2006/07
(to section 1 – summary)
Objective |
Action |
Outcome |
Target & date to be achieved |
Key Officer/ Partners |
Link to Corporate Objective |
Bid to budget process |
|
Hold
Select Committee Workshops |
|
|
Apr
04 |
ARD |
1
- 6 |
|
|
Operate
Joint Health Committee HIoW |
|
|
Sept
03 |
ARD/HioW
SHA |
1 |
Supported
by bid for FTE |
|
Complete
Transport Best Value programme |
|
|
Apr
05 |
DR |
5 |
|
|
Implement
and monitor full training programme for Select Committee Members |
|
|
Oct
03 |
ARD/JV/SE
Employers |
1
- 6 |
|
|
4b Service Improvement Plan 2004/5, 2005/06, 2006/07
Objective |
Action
|
Outcome
|
Target
|
Key Officer/Partner |
Linked to Corporate Objective |
Bid
to Budget process |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critical
Success Factor |
Outcome |
Key
Actions |
Key
Dates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Key Performance Measures and Targets 2004/05
5a Your top 3 targets for the Annual Action Statement 2004/05
Target Description |
Target 2003/04 If app. |
Target 2004/05 |
Benchmark
figure and year if app. |
Source |
Complete the Planning Review, Procurement Review and Benefits Review |
Undertake
and complete Review programme |
|
|
|
Increased stakeholder involvement in Best Value Reviews and Select
Committees |
|
|
|
|
In corporate effective tracking procedure of Select Committee decisions |
Review
tracking procedure |
Number
of recommendations accepted by the Executive and actions undertaken by
Portfolio Holders |
|
5b Mandatory targets
Performance
Indicator and source |
Target 2002/3 |
Actual 2002/3 |
Target 2003/4 |
Target
2004/5 |
Benchmark
Figure |
Source |
75% |
|
80% |
90% |
- |
? |
Our
aim is to make electronic transactions the first means of communicating with
all our stakeholders. Hard copy
correspondence will only be used with those that do not have the means to
communicate electronically.
5c Other key targets
Performance
Indicator and source |
Target 2002/3 |
Actual 2002/3 |
Target 2003/4 |
Target
2004/5 |
Benchmark
Figure |
Source |
500 |
|
1,000 |
1,500 |
|
|
|
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6a. Consultation
Subject for
Consultation |
Dates and Contact |
Consultation with
whom |
Key Results of
Consultation |
Actions taken/ cross ref to Key
Objectives/ Improvement Plan |
Planning –
awareness/satisfaction/ improvements |
Jan – Aug 2003 |
MORI, Public Users |
Awareness raising, user
involvement/ improvements |
BV Improvement Plan |
Procurement
partnering/Construction-line/E-procurement |
May/Jun 2003 |
Local Suppliers |
Awareness of local
economy issues |
BV Improvement Plan |
6b Future consultation
Dates
and contact |
Consultation with whom |
|
Benefits
– speed of processing/accuracy/access |
Aug/Sept
2003 |
Users,
Housing Assoc’s etc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Resource Bids Summary
Reference Number
|
Description
|
Financial
Implications |
||
|
|
2004/5 £000 |
2005/6 £000 |
2006/7 £000 |
1 |
SCS Research post |
17.995 |
17.995 |
17.995 |
2 |
General ICT equipment |
2.000 |
2.000 |
2.000 |
Resource Bid Forms
Service Area:
1. Nature of service |
Select Committee Support |
2. Key objectives delivered |
|
3. Current resource use |
|||
|
Gross £000 |
Income £000 |
Net £000 |
SCS
salaries and support costs |
188.192 |
|
188.192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Service volumes and
outputs |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Key performance
indicators |
||||
|
IWC Current |
IWC target |
Bench-mark |
Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Benchmarking data |
|||
|
|
|
|
7. Service development
proposal |
|
8. Additional resources
required (if
any) |
|||
|
2004-5 £000 |
2005-06 £000 |
2006-07 £000 |
Salaries & on costs |
17.195 |
17.195 |
17.195 |
Office |
0.300 |
0.300 |
0.300 |
General ICT |
2.000 |
2.000 |
2.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
19.495 |
19.495 |
19.495 |
9. Training and
Development requirements (if any) |
|||
|
2004-05 £000 |
2005-06 £000 |
2006-07 £000 |
Training |
0.500 |
0.500 |
0.500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
0.500 |
0.500 |
0.500 |
10. Linkages to partners,
other services, corporate values |
Including Health Scrutiny and potential for
income-generating supporting the Health PCT democratic committee process. |
11. Impact on key
performance indicators – measure of success |
|
12. Key corporate
objectives delivered |
|
.