1. How informative did you find the
E-Government presentations and question/answer sessions.
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
4 |
|
1 |
|
not
helpful partly helpful fairly
helpful good excellent
2. Did the presentations help you to understand
E-Government issues any better?
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
not
much better a little better fairly helpful good excellent
understanding
understanding
3. What
priority would you give to the delivery of the E-Government agenda?
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
not important
fairly important
important very
important vital
4. Which E-Government model do you think would
improve service delivery?
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
in-house partnership outsource
5. If
outsourcing or partnerships were considered which company do you consider could
best deliver the
IWC
E-Government agenda? (a number of respondents gave more than one answer
to this question)
|
|
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
RightNow SAP Deloitte Steria Yokogawa
Technologies & Touche Marex
6. Would you
support taking further evidence from the companies that made presentations?
|
1 |
|
6 |
|
No Yes
If so, which one?
Yokogawa Marex - 3
SAP-1
Deloitte & Touche -1
All the companies except Yokogawa Marex -1
All the companies except Right Now Technologies – 1
Comments Received: “My opinion is external IT
would be a waste of public money” “Yokogawa represents the
greatest challenge and is ground-breaking in local government. However
Deloitte & Touche may be needed in laying the foundations in
partnership” “I believe that though a
useful tool this questionnaire does not enable us to fully relate what our
thoughts on the e-govt agenda and presentations actually were”
Completed by Cllr
..............................................
Thank you for taking the time and trouble to
complete this questionnaire. Your
replies will be collected and collated by the Select Committee Support team and
circulated to Members.