MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – SITE INSPECTIONS HELD AT COUNTY HALL, NEWPORT, ISLE OF WIGHT ON FRIDAY, 5 NOVEMBER 2004 COMMENCING AT 11.00 am
Present :
Mrs M J Miller (Chairman), Mr B E Abraham,
Mr A C Coburn, Mr J H Fleming,
Mr J F Howe, Mrs M A Jarman,
Mr V J Morey, Mr A A Taylor,
Mr D G Williams, Mr D T Yates
Apologies :
Mr C B W Chapman,
Mr E Fox, Mr C H Lillywhite,
Mr J A Whittaker
55. MINUTES
RESOLVED :
THAT the Minutes of the
meeting held on 26 October 2004 be
confirmed.
56. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Interests were
declared in the following matters:
Mr D T Yates declared a
personal interest in minute 57 – item 1, 56 School Crescent, Godshill, Ventnor,
as he knew the Applicant
57.
REPORT OF THE HEAD OF PLANNING SERVICES
Planning
Applications and Related Matters
Consideration was given to items in the report of the Head
of Planning Services.
RESOLVED :
THAT
the two applications be determined as detailed below :
The reasons for the resolutions made
in accordance with Officer recommendation are given in the Planning
report. Where resolutions are made
contrary to Officer recommendation the reasons for doing so are contained in
the minutes.
|
Application: |
TCP/26494 |
|
Details: |
Demolition of conservatory;
alterations and single/two storey extension to provide additional living
accommodation 56 School Crescent, Godshill
Ventnor |
|
Additional Representations: |
None |
|
Comment: |
Members were prepared to support the principle of a part two storey
extension, but commented that they were unhappy with several aspects of the
design |
|
Decision: |
Application
deferred for further negotiations on design |
|
Conditions: |
(item
1) |
|
Application: |
TCP/26462 |
|
Details: |
Bungalow Land adjacent 14 Queens Drive, Brading, Sandown |
|
Additional Representations: |
None |
|
Comment: |
Members considered that the site was not suitable for a development
of a single detached unit |
|
Decision: |
Contrary
to Officers recommendation, Members refused planning permission |
|
Reasons: |
Refused
on the grounds that the proposed application would have a significant impact
on the environment, neighbouring property, and that it would be over
development |
CHAIRMAN