ANNEX B
SUMMARY OF THIRD PARTY REPRESENTATIONS
Although a number of
third parties have written more than one letter, the grounds for objection
referred to in the letters of representation are as follows:
- Residential development
inappropriate – site should be a nature reserve or park;
- Proposal is a housing
estate masquerading as an old peoples home;
- Rural character of the
area would be spoiled by residential development;
- Adverse effect on
wildlife habitat, e.g. barn owls, red squirrels, dormice, bats, reptiles
and other flora and fauna;
- Protected trees would
be lost;
- Older people should mix
in with the community, not become cut off and isolated;
- Specialist healthcare
and social services will be needed and existing services will be
overstretched;
- More mainland people
will come to the village and there are enough pensioners living here
already;
- Proposal does not
conform to policies of the adopted UDP which the Council spent a great
deal of time and money producing;
- Not an institutional
proposal, will be change of use to residential and retail;
- Site is in rural area
adjoining AONB, unsuited to development of this scale;
- Demolition of Victorian
buildings is unacceptable;
- Loss of landscape value
and parkland character;
- Site served narrow
rural roads, much used by cyclists, horse riders and walkers and
additional traffic would add to hazards of road users;
- Applicant’s traffic
survey ignored Sandy Lane and Marvel Lane traffic to the east of the site;
- Access road too narrow
for construction and service traffic;
- Area has never had to
accommodate levels of traffic suggested by TRICS data submitted by
applicant;
- Applicant’s Highways
report is biased, backed by data inappropriate for the site, traffic counts
did not recognise the traffic to other uses such as the laundry, the
sports ground, staff traffic etc;
- Residents are aware of
accidents at Whitcombe Road/Sandy Lane junction, despite comments in
applicant’s Highways report;
- There is poor provision
of public transport services in the area;
- The quality of
application drawings is inadequate;
- Scheme is gross over
development of the site;
- Buildings are of
important historic interest, not only to the Isle of Wight but to British
social history overall;
- Confusion as to extent
of application site, if additional land is required, no ecological
assessment has been made and there is likely to be impact on Gatcombe
withybed SINC if this happens;
- Landscape/Ecology
report is based on a walkover survey in October, when a large number of
species had died down, migrated or were preparing for hibernation;
- Tree schedule has been
incorrectly prepared without the necessary Climbing survey carried out by
a fully qualified Arboriculturist;
- Proposal will lead to
significant increase in light pollution in a rural area;
- Jobs in the laundry and
other offices still in use will be put at risk;
- In the past sewerage
system at the site and to Newport has caused environmental problems;
- More people die on the
Island than are born, so houses should be pulled down, not built;
- No development of this
nature should be allowed in true villages in the area;
- Villages are created
naturally, not in this artificial manner;
- Any restriction of
residents to over-50 will be almost impossible to enforce;
- There was flooding in
Sandy Lane last winter and more development will exacerbate the situation
– EA advises this is a flood risk area;
- Proposals fail to show
that benefits outweigh any disbenefits, including relevant planning
criteria;
- There will be an
enormous level of pollution in a beautiful rural area – noise, traffic and
air quality;
- There is already a
village called Gatcombe and the name of the proposed development will
cause confusion;
- People should not be
segregated by age, accommodation for all ages should be provided;
- Plans are inaccurate –
do not show current boundaries and are 7 – 8 years out of date;
- No objection to
appropriate re-use, e.g. Council Headquarters;
- Business users in lane
cause problems with vehicles manoeuvring in and obstructing the
highway.