MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE DEVELOPMENT CONTROL
COMMITTEE - SITE INSPECTIONS HELD AT COUNTY HALL, NEWPORT, ISLE OF WIGHT ON
FRIDAY, 1 AUGUST 2003 COMMENCING AT
Present :
Mrs M J Miller
(Chairman), Mr C B W Chapman, Mr J Fleming, Mr E Fox,
Mr J F Howe, Mr C H Lillywhite,
Mrs M A Jarman, Mr V J Morey,
Mr I R Stephens (deputising for Mr B E Abraham),
Mr A A Taylor
Apologies :
Mr
B E Abraham, Mr J A Whittaker, Mr D G Williams
Also Present (non voting) :
Mrs T M Butchers
32.
MINUTES
RESOLVED :
THAT the
Minutes of the meeting held on 22 July 2003
be confirmed.
33.
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
There were no declarations received at this stage.
34.
REPORT OF HEAD OF PLANNING SERVICES
Consideration
was given to the following items 1 - 2 in the report of the Strategic Director
of Environment Services.
RESOLVED :
THAT the application be determined as detailed below :
The reasons for the resolutions made in accordance with Officer recommendation are given in the Planning report. Where resolutions are made contrary to Officer recommendation the reasons for doing so are contained in the minutes.
Application: |
TCP/19499/G
|
|
|
Details: |
5
Lugley Street, Newport, Isle Of Wight Alterations
& single/2 storey extension to provide additional sales area on ground
floor with 8 self-contained apartments over on 1st & 2nd floors (revised
scheme) |
|
|
Additional
Representations: |
A
letter had been received on behalf of a trust fund supporting the application. |
|
|
Comments: |
None |
|
|
Decision: |
Conditional planning
permission, subject to the conditions set out in the Part II Register. |
|
|
Conditions: |
As per report (item 1)
with an amendment to condition No. 4 from the Council’s Archaeological
Officer |
|
|
|
Application: |
TCP/16931/E |
|
|
Details: |
Cherry House,
Binstead Road, Ryde, Isle Of Wight Alterations to
vehicular access (revised scheme) |
|
|
Additional Representations: |
None |
|
|
Comment: |
None |
|
|
Decision: |
Deferred for further
negotiation – to be dealt with under officer delegated powers. That for the interim period the Applicant
be required to remove the temporary obstruction on the driveway and be
required to comply with the condition not to have more than one vehicle on the
driveway |
|
|
Reasons: |
Members believed that a
comprise to the situation should be achievable |
|