MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE STANDARDS COMMITTEE HELD
AT COUNTY HALL, NEWPORT, ISLE OF WIGHT ON TUESDAY 11 JUNE 2002 COMMENCING AT
2.30 PM
Present :
Mrs T M Butchers,
Mr B Claxton, Mr M J Cunningham, Prof. D Farnham, Mr D Hansford, Mrs J Harding,
Mr R Phillips, Mr D Russell, His Honour John Wroath
Also present: Mr J Howe, Mr R G Mazillius
1.
ELECTION
OF CHAIRMAN
RESOLVED
:
THAT
His Honour John Wroath be elected Chairman of the Committee.
2.
MINUTES
RESOLVED
:
THAT the Minutes of the meeting held on 14 December 2001 be confirmed and signed by
the Chairman.
3.
MR WALLY
LINNINGTON BEM
Before proceeding with the rest of the meeting the
Committee paid tribute to the late Mr Wally Linnington who had been a founder
member of the Committee and whose common sense and overall input to the
Committee’s proceeding would be missed following his death earlier in the year.
4.
ADOPTION
OF THE CODES OF CONDUCT
The Committee considered the report of the Monitoring
Officer on the level of attendance of Members at the various training events
and the implementation of the Codes of Conduct. It was noted that some 78% of
Isle of Wight Councillors, and 68% of all Parish and Town Councillors, had
attended one or other training event. Given this level of attendance it was
felt that the training had been a success and that further sessions should only
be arranged where a specific request was received.
RESOLVED :
THAT the report be noted and that
further training sessions be arranged when specific requests are received.
5.
PARISH AND
TOWN COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE
The Committee considered a request from the
Association of Parish and Town Councils that Mr R Mew be Mr D
Russell’s deputy on the Committee. It was felt that this was an excellent idea.
RESOLVED :
THAT Mr R Mew be appointed as a
deputy for Mr D Russell on this Committee.
6.
DISPENSATIONS
UNDER SECTION 81(4) OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 2000
The Committee received a report from the Monitoring
Officer on the Committee’s new power to grant dispensations to allow members to
participate in an item of business that they would normally be precluded from
participating in as they have a personal and prejudicial interest. It was noted that this power could only be
granted in the following circumstances:
1.
If more that
half the members of the Council were caught by the interest; or
2.
If the
Council would not be able to comply with the political proportionality
requirements unless a dispensation was granted.
The Committee were also informed that this power could
not be delegated and had to be exercised by the Committee itself. Therefore,
given that in some circumstances the Committee would need to be able to respond
quickly to such requests, the Committee considered changes to its terms of
reference to streamline the procedures.
It was agreed that the Council should be asked to amend the Committee’s
terms of reference so that the quorum when considering requests for
dispensations be two independent members and one member from either the Isle of
Wight Council (where the request came from an Isle of Wight Councillor) or the
Association of Parish and Town Councils (where the request came from a Parish
or Town Councillor).
RESOLVED :
THAT the power to grant dispensations (and the
restrictions thereon) be noted and that all Councillors on the Isle of Wight be
informed of the process.
RESOLVED
TO RECOMMEND TO FULL COUNCIL
:
THAT the Membership and Terms of
Reference of the Standards Committee be amended so that the quorum when
considering requests for dispensations be two independent members and one
member from either the Isle of Wight Council (where the request came from an
Isle of Wight Councillor) or the Association of Parish and Town Councils (where
the request came from a Parish or Town Councillor).
7.
LOCAL
INVESTIGATIONS AND DETERMINATION OF MISCONDUCT ALLEGATIONS
The
Committee viewed a video produced by the Standards Board on the Codes of
Conduct.
The Committee then considered a report by the
Monitoring Officer on a consultation paper that detailed the Government’s
proposals for how the Standards Committee might be involved in the
determination of misconduct allegations, including the ability of the Standards
Committee to impose sanctions.
The
consultation paper and its proposals were considered in some detail and it was
RESOLVED :
THAT the Monitoring Officer and Chairman approve the
detail of the Committee’s response to the questions posed at the end of the
Consultation Paper on the basis of the responses below:
Question Number: |
Response: |
1. |
Yes |
2. to 5. |
There needed to be some definition of
when an allegation became a complaint to enable all those involved to make
the correct decisions at the right time.
Additionally it is felt that the model of the Magistrates Courts
should be followed in that all complaints should be considered locally and
that the local Standards Committee should decide if a complaint should be
referred to the Standards Board, rather than the other way round as suggested
in the paper. |
6. |
Yes |
7. |
Yes – subject to experience as the rules
are implemented. |
8. |
Yes |
9. |
It was felt that there should be some
ability for costs to be awarded in certain cases and that these should be met
centrally. |
8.
REFERENCES
FROM COUNCIL
The Committee considered a request from the Council to
look at and advise on the issue of Members Attendance records. It was suggested
that a Sub Committee of three under the Chairmanship of Mr B Claxton be
established to look into the detail of this matter.
RESOLVED :
THAT a Sub Committee of Mr Claxton (Chairman), Mrs
Harding and Mrs Butchers be established to consider the request from the
Council and to report back its recommendations to this Committee by the end of
October 2002.
CHAIRMAN