MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE SOCIAL SERVICES, HOUSING AND BENEFITS SELECT COMMITTEE HELD AT COUNTY HALL, NEWPORT, ISLE OF WIGHT ON THURSDAY, 15 APRIL 2004 COMMENCING AT 9.30 AM

 

Present :

 

Mr I R Stephens (Chairman),Mr R G Mazillius, Mr J R Adams, Mr A C Bartlett, Mrs B D Clough, Mr A J Mellor, Mr V J Morey, Mrs E Oulton, Mr R C Richards (deputising for Mr J F Howe)

 

Apologies :

 

                        Mrs D Gardiner, Mr J F Howe, Mr D G Williams

 

Portfolio Holder :

 

                        Mr G S Kendall

 

Also Present (non voting) :

 

                        Mr B Buckle, Mrs S A Smart, Mrs J L Wareham

 


 


90.              MINUTES

 

RESOLVED :

 

THAT the Minutes of the meeting held on 29 March 2004 be confirmed.

 

91.              DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

There were no declarations at this stage.

 

92.              URGENT BUSINESS

 

The Chairman raised two items of urgent business which warranted the attention of the Select Committee

 

a)      Mrs D Cousins

 

The Chairman referred to Minute 64 a) of the Select Committee held on 22 January 2004 and clarified that Mrs D Cousins had not retired but her post was no longer required as part of the Directorates restructuring and was therefore redundant.

 

RESOLVED :

 

THAT the position be noted.

 

b)      Housing

 

The Portfolio Holder advised the Select Committee that the Council would receive £9.3 million Housing allocation funding over 2 years. This would help acquire 350 new homes. In addition he reported that the Governments target of no families with children being in Bed and Breakfast Accommodation by April 2004 had been achieved.

 

The preliminary findings of the IDEA Beacon Peer Review had been received. These were positive and particularly referred to the Members active involvement.


 

RESOLVED :

 

THAT the position be noted.

 

93.              BUDGET MONITORING REPORT AS AT END OF FEBRUARY 2004

 

The Select Committee considered the report of the Portfolio Holder for Social Services and Housing which set out the budget and spending position on both revenue and capital within the Committee’s remit.

 

Members were advised that the Directorate was currently projecting a potential overspend of approximately £153,000. The end of year figures would be finalised by the end of May 2004.

 

During questioning Members were advised that underspends within Children’s Services had offset overspends in other areas. Savings in recruitment and retention in Children’s Services had contributed to these savings. The Select Committee were assured that funding for the existing vacancies had been accounted for in the 2004/05 budget.

 

Due to an increase in the proportion of higher cost placements, pressures had arisen within the community care budget. The Head of Adult Services assured Members that the financial effects of placements were being closely monitored.

 

RESOLVED :

 

THAT the report be noted.

 

94.              HOUSING AND COUNCIL TAX BENEFITS BEST VALUE REVIEW IMPROVEMENT PLAN

 

The lead Member for the Benefits Best Value Review, Mrs E Oulton, presented the Improvement Plan developed in response to reports by the Benefit Fraud Inspectorate and the Best Value Review of the Benefits Service. The Select Committee were advised that extensive consultation was carried out as part of the review. No additional resources were required to deliver the plan. In addition it was noted that there were seven standards to which the Improvement Plan was set out and the Plan had yet to be approved by the Benefit Fraud Inspectorate. In particular, Members noted processing claims improvements were substantial. 

 

Questions were asked regarding a number of issues which were listed as being raised during the review but not acted upon. Members were advised that during the initial stages of the review many items were raised as possible items to include, and for various reasons were not included in the final Plan. It was noted that there was still an opportunity to include them in the Plan if the Select Committee wished. It was suggested that these issues be revisited in six months time to assess whether they should be included.

 

The Select Committee supported the involvement of the Voluntary Sector. It was noted that in particular the Benefits Service had developed strong links with Age Concern and ways of ensuring that the service was wide reaching in rural areas were being investigated.

 

The Benefits Manager considered that the Improvement Plan would continue to have a large impact on the improvement of services. In particular it had raised the profile of the service, improved the processing of claims and had allowed the areas of fraud and overpayments to be addressed.

 

RESOLVED :

 

a)      THAT the Improvement Plan be supported and that Councillor Erica Oulton, continue to act as lead Member for the Best Value Review so to monitor its progress.

 

b)      THAT a progress report be brought back in six months time.

 

95.              SUPPORT FOR FOSTER CARERS AND RESULTS OF THE FOSTER CARER SATISFACTION SURVEY

 

Due to the close links between the two reports the Committee agreed that these should be considered jointly.

 

The Chairman welcomed Mrs Belinda Williams and Mrs Elaine Taylor who were both foster carers to the meeting.

 

The Portfolio Holder referred to his report on Support For Foster Carers which provided an update on how the additional funding of £250,000 allocated by the Council in April 2003 had been used to provide practical support packages to foster carers. The recruitment and retention of foster carers had been of concern at both a national and regional level for a number of years. In addition the Island had experienced difficulty in securing a sufficient number and range of local foster care placements to meet the needs of children. Members were advised that the service had been successful in approving 20 new carers whilst only de-registering 9. It was noted that the additional funding made available would not be fully utilised in 2003/04. The Select Committee considered that it was vital to build in the work already undertaken to provide improved support to foster carers. A number of new initiatives were being investigated and could only be implemented if the level of funding was continued in 2004/05

 

With regard to the Results of the Satisfaction survey the Portfolio Holder advised that a telephone survey had been undertaken between 23 February and 22 March 2004 on all foster carers who contacted the Emergency Duty Service (EDS) and the Foster and Adoption Services Team (FAST), for support outside office hours. The total number of respondents that completed the survey into EDS and FAST was 17, 90% of the target group.

 

During discussion questions were raised regarding the educational achievement of Looked After Children (LAC). It was agreed that this was an area that required improvement. Steps had been made to improve the situation by providing LAC with Personal Education Plans. Concern was raised regarding the percentage of LAC with three or more placements during one year. It was explained that the criteria used for counting placements often distorted figures. It was agreed that a breakdown of figures be circulated to the Select Committee.

 

The Chairman invited Mrs Williams and Mrs Taylor to comment on the Foster Carer Service. Both carers largely supported the service and improvements but raised the following concerns:

 

·         The recruitment of two Treatment Foster Carers had been unsuccessful. It was commented that many carers would not be able to commit 37 hours per week to such a post and alternative arrangements could be investigated.

·         Lack of consultation regarding the transfer of respite money to carers and no clear direction on how it should be used.

·         The babysitting service was not easily accessible for everyone.

·         Some difficulties were being experienced with carers accessing NVQ courses.

 

All the comments were considered, in particular members were advised that two different NVQ schemes had been implemented, however the take up and completion rate had been relatively low. It was agreed that the reasons for this needed to be explored.


RESOLVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE EXECUTIVE:

 

THAT the underspending on the Foster Carers package be carried forward and utilised for the development of initiatives introduced in April 2003.

 

RESOLVED :

 

THAT the Children and Young Person’s Committee be asked to consider to review and monitor Looked After Children.

 

96.              RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION TASK GROUP

 

The Select Committee received an update on the work of the recruitment and retention Task Group which commenced in February 2002. This had been established to address workforce issues regarding the recruitment and retention of childcare social workers. It was reported that the vacancy rate had been reduced from 24% to 4.5%, equating to 1 vacancy. It was noted that the identification of temporary accommodation to assist staff moving to the Island was still an outstanding matter for consideration.

 

Members were informed that £3,000 had been committed to the bursary scheme and two prospective employees would commence their appointment during this summer.

 

The Select Committee commended the work of the Task Group. Discussion ensued regarding the future of the Task Group. It was agreed that this should be considered at the Committee’s Development Day in May 2004.

 

RESOLVED :

 

THAT all Task Groups under the auspices of the Select Committee be reviewed at the Committee’s Development Day on 20 May 2004.

 

97.              UPDATE ON THE ISLE OF WIGHT HEALTHCARE STRATEGY

 

The Chairman welcomed Mr Mark Price, Director of Strategic Development, Isle of Wight Healthcare Trust to the meeting. The Select Committee had undertaken its own consultation on the proposals contained in the Isle of Wight Local Healthcare Strategy and at its meeting on 19 February 2004 had presented a number of recommendations to the local health bodies in response to the proposals. The PCT and NHS Trust had now considered these recommendations as part of their analysis of their overall consultation process and presented this report which outlined the way forward.

 

Mr Price advised the meeting that the consultation report had been approved by both the PCT and Healthcare Boards. As part of the overall consultation the Trust had received 63 written responses from members of the public, staff, voluntary organisations and interested stakeholders. It was noted that the response was greatest on the transfer of care and patient travel cost sections. Dentistry and mental health had also attracted a good response.

 

Following the consultation process the proposals broadly fell into 3 categories :

 

·         Primary Care, Dentistry, Emergency Services, Surgery, Maternity Services - Commissioning would be progressed to implementation.

·         Transfer of Care, Older People Services and Mental Health Services - The general direction was clear and accepted, but concerns raised on implementation needed to be addressed and further consultation was required on the implementation plan.

·         Children’s Services and Patient Transport and Travel required a further review and new proposals.

With regard to the Transfer of Care there had been concern raised during the consultation regarding the implementation of this part of the Strategy, this required more consultation. It was confirmed that there would be no further bed reductions until April 2005. The Mental Health proposals had raised concern on the impact of bed changes and the proposed estate rationalisation.

 

Following consultation and new information the staffing model needed further work. The proposals had suggested a consultant delivered service. However this was not a model that was being widely planned nationally and the health bodies considered would require further consultation.

 

The health bodies whilst expressing concerns regarding the Select Committee’s recommendation that more resources should be spent on Patient Transport and Travel, supported its view there should be joint working with the voluntary sector.

 

With regard to the Resource Plan the health bodies now had a better understanding of resource levels available and cost pressures for 2004/05. Due to pay reform changes a larger recovery plan would be required and some areas of the Strategy would be reconsidered in light of this.

 

The Strategic Director for Social Services would be drafting detailed proposals on older peoples services and the transfer of care. This would be submitted to the Select Committee for comment at the appropriate time.

 

RESOLVED :

 

a)      THAT arrangements be made for the Select Committee to informally discuss the implications of the Trust/PCT Board’s recommendations

 

b)      THAT the process of joint working on the Healthcare Strategy with the PCT and Healthcare Trust, in line with the Council’s Statement of Intent be supported.

 

 

 

 

CHAIRMAN