2002 ADULT SERVICES
BEST VALUE SERVICE IMPROVEMENT PLAN (Updated January 2003).
Key to ‘Who’:
JL-James Lowe (Acting Head Of Adult Services) CS – Claire Shand, (Learning Centre). ‘EDC’-Dawn Cousins, (Head of Policy and
Performance and Resources). ‘MH’-Martin
Henson (Adult Service Manager), ‘PS’-Pete
Scott (Manager of Wightcare Services).
‘PCT’-
Primary Care Trust, ‘SHA’-
Strategic Health Authority, ‘DoH’-
Department of Health, SW – Sara Weech (Commissioner), PCT, GB – Gillian Baker
(Commissioner) PCT.
|
Improvement |
Action |
Resource Implications |
Who |
When |
Indicator |
Current Situation |
||
Ensure Fair And Informed Access
To Information, Advice And Services
|
|||||||||
Improve the quality and consistency of access to social
care information, assessment and services.
|
Review new adult services working arrangements:
-The single adult services referral and information
service.
-New specialist Team service. -Customer services and support arrangements. |
JL |
Review of functioning and opening hours to be
completed by July 2002 |
Review of reorganisation to recommend necessary
adjustments to structure and working arrangements. |
A review of reorganisation has been undertaken.
Findings include satisfaction with improved access to services. Areas for
improvement include further reduction in assessment times and continued
workload rebalancing. Extended working hours were judged unnecessary at
present. |
||||
Improve the quality of public information about health
and care services for adults.
|
Information leaflets and other public information
arrangements to be updated.
Develop a One-Stop multi-agency information and
advice service |
Directorate Information and Communications Group
to develop a new Information Strategy. Some investment in a joint service will be
required depending on the form of partnership. |
EDC |
6 monthly review of progress underway. Information strategy to be in place and
operating from September 2002 Secure a multi-agency agreement by January 2003. |
A continuous process. An Information and Communications Strategy to be
in place. Success indicated by measurable improvement in user and partner
satisfaction (survey). |
Information strategy in place and the updating of
information has commenced. New carers handbooks and a catalogue of services
for older people will be published in February 2003. Significant further progress will be dependent
on the successful re-appointment of a communications co-ordinator in March 2003 |
|||
The quality and availability of information, which can be
of help to all stakeholders, requires improvement, with better use made of
the potential benefits of e-government.
|
Active support for a single and managed adult services
resources database networked to all Council staff and significant health and
voluntary partners.
|
EDC |
Pilot database available by September 2002. Networked database from September 2003. |
A networked and secure database of care services
and resources available on the Council Intranet and available to other
approved stakeholders. |
A resources database has been developed and is
in pilot operation. This is networked on the intranet. All adult services
staff and out of hours workers will have access from February 2003. Selected
health staff will have web access during 2003. |
||||
Improve the take-up of the Direct Payments scheme
|
Promote and market Direct Payments availability and
arrangements.
|
Continued investment in training and IW Advocacy
Consortium support to service users. |
MH |
Review April 2002 Service re-launch in July 2002 |
Best Value Performance Plan Targets for
increasing take-up to be met from 2002-2005 |
Take up increased as planned, but levels are
still below the increased expectations of the department of health (DoH).
Take up will be promoted again from April 2003. |
|||
Improve awareness of multi-cultural needs.
|
Staff training to include multi-cultural and ethnic
minority awareness raising.
|
To be included as appropriate in planned
training events |
JL & CS |
Inclusion in the Annual Directorate Training
Plan |
Evidenced content in training events |
Cultural awareness is now included as a core
element of all relevant events in the directorate’s training plan. |
|||
Improvement In The Commissioning And Arranging Of Care |
|||||||||
Improve consistency in commissioning services and
building capacity.
|
Protocols required for clarifying the responsibilities of
lead Commissioners and the Contracting service
|
None |
EDC SW and GB |
Protocol in place by June 2002 |
The use of agreed protocols. |
From November 2002, single agency lead
commissioning has been in place using section 31 flexibilities in the Health
Act 1999. Some protocols are in place as part of this process, all to be
completed by March 2003 |
|||
Improve commissioning and capacity building through the
collection of data about unmet and new needs
|
Continue improvement to care planning and purchasing
(including ‘brokerage’), and regular updating of Market Maps.
|
None. The invest to save ‘Brokerage’ Pilot to be
evaluated and acted upon. |
JL and EDC |
Review of new and pilot arrangements by October
2002 |
Improved robustness of unmet need data.
Measurable improvement in staff satisfaction with processes. |
Two brokers were appointed for a pilot period.
The scheme proved effective in collecting information and making effective
use of resources. The service requires one broker. Funding for one post has
been found from adult services budgets. The permanent position will commence
April 2003 |
|||
Improve value for money in time paid for by users of the
homecare service
|
Continue to reduce the homecare travelling time paid for
by service users.
|
None |
EDC and GB |
Review impact of team and locality based care
services by April 2003 |
Reduction of 10% or greater in charged
travelling time. |
An audit has been completed; internal costing
mechanism will need to be adjusted for financial year 2003/4 to take account
of this. |
|||
Ensure future capacity and long-term sustainability in
care services and improve provider relationships.
|
Continuous development of a flexible range of contracting
and pricing arrangements for service providers.
|
None at present |
EDC and GB |
Continuous development |
Meet capacity building targets set out in the
commissioning strategy. Improved stakeholder satisfaction (survey). |
Improved information on contracting options and
processes has been published. A stakeholder conference has been held and a
partnership forum set up. The procurement strategy is finalised and a
contracts portfolio will be published by April 2003. |
|||
Improvement is needed in the efficiency and transparency
of contracting and billing arrangements for community care services.
|
Contracting and billing arrangements that apply to
externally purchased homecare should also apply to the in-house provider.
|
Extra staff would be required to extend current
systems to all providers. However, investment in IT systems will reduce
administrative costs. This cannot be fully costed at present (see point 27
below) |
EDC and JL |
See point 27 below |
The operation of a single billing system for all
providers. |
Progress is dependent on improvement in the
directorate’s main database, which should include the capacity for a unified
billing system. This is referred to in point 27 below. |
|||
Improve stakeholder understanding of contract
arrangements and links between contracting and outcomes
|
Staff training on contracting arrangements. To include
awareness of the need for diversity and flexibility in arranging services.
|
To be met from existing training resources |
EDC and JL |
Staff training to be undertaken annually from
2002 |
Recorded training of all care management staff. |
Care management updates now include a
contracting refresher session. Staff also receive a newsletter from the
contracts team. |
|||
Improve the speed, efficiency and accuracy of charging
arrangements
|
Extend the role of specialist Finance Officers to
community care services.
|
None at present but resources will be required
by Oct 2002. Cost not yet known |
EDC |
From October 2002 |
DoH guidance on charging will drive detailed
success factors. |
New specialist finance officers are in place. Fairer
charging is the subject of a separate report to select committee. Fairer
charging will have a significant workload and financial implication for the
Directorate. The timescales for implementation are contained within this
separate report but in brief consultation commences January 2003 and full
implementation from April 2003. |
|||
Simplify purchasing processes and ensure effective use of
care management staff.
|
Pilot ‘Brokerage’, which will transfer purchasing
activity to expert staff
|
Pilot funded to October 2002 by Council grant
funding. |
EDC and MH |
Evaluation of pilot scheme by October 2002 |
Costed decision on the future of brokerage. |
See section 7 above. Stakeholders have expressed satisfaction with
improved consistency. Some Care Manager time has been saved. |
|||
The meals on wheels service must improve in response to
concerns over efficiency, service quality and sustainability.
|
Tender the complete service to an independent provider
who would contract to manage and deliver a meals service within current
budget.
|
EDC and GB |
Current contract conditions indicate that a
contract could be arranged by March 2003 |
Measurable improvement in stakeholder
satisfaction. Measurable efficiency gains in the Contracting team. |
The tendering process has been subject to delay.
A tender will be issued in February with a new contract in place from
September 2003. |
||||
The independence of older and physically disabled people
would be improved by greater choice and flexibility in meals services.
|
Investigation of a frozen meals service, which allows
people to manage their own meal arrangements.
|
None, the service would be funded through
charges paid by the service user. |
EDC and GB |
Investigation of options by September 2002. |
Service provision at no cost to the Directorate. |
Options investigated on time. Considerable
interest has been shown in providing this service; it will form a part of 14
above. |
|||
The transport needs of the community and those who need
access to health and care services need to be more clearly defined and
explained.
|
The Directorate to collaborate with a Council Best Value
review of transport.
|
None, to be assisted by current Central Support
Services and Adult Services staff |
JL |
Complete by March 2003 |
Completion of a review and a costed improvement
plan. |
The council BV review has not taken place as
anticipated. There are no plans at present for a separate review to take
place within the directorate. |
|||
A strategy for the future provision of in-house care
services is needed to clarify the role of in-house services
|
A ‘value for money’ review of Wightcare Services should
be undertaken.
|
The review can be conducted by Directorate
staff. The Council may choose to engage independent consultants at a cost of
approx £30,000 |
GB |
Complete by March 2003 |
Completion of the review and future strategy for
in-house service provision. |
The directorate has not had the capacity to
undertake a separate review of Wightcare Services. By March 2004, the new
commissioners will prepare a costed plan for future review |
|||
Development
Of More Consistent And High Quality Assessment And Care Services
|
|||||||||
Significant improvement is needed in the information
given to care providers, their staff and service users about care
arrangements, risks and change.
|
Clear instructions and monitored standards to be
provided. The documentation and information provided to service users and
carers to be improved in line with the aspirations of the ‘Single Assessment
Process’.
|
To be undertaken as part of the Directorate’s
Information Strategy (see point 2 above) and the response to the DoH ‘Single
Assessment Process’. |
JL |
The Information Strategy will co-ordinate
change. Timescale to be determined as part of the
Directorate response to the Single Assessment Process. |
Measurable improvement in stakeholder satisfaction
with the exchange of information, which is currently very low (survey). |
The information strategy (point 2 above) has
commenced a ‘good practice’ group is developing improved documentation for
all directorate services. A Long-Term Care Charter is in place. The PCT is leading development of the Single
Assessment Process, which will require further change in documentation. The
PCT is reporting annually on progress to the SHA, the process to be completed
by April 2005. |
|||
Care providers are reluctant to complain about
Directorate staff or their actions. Investigate and act on unjustified
adverse impact on trade
|
Contracts with providers to undertake to act on
allegations that trade has been adversely affected as the result of a
complaint about the Directorate or a member of it’s staff
|
None |
EDC |
Continuous process as contracts renewed or
created. |
All contracts to have the commitment included. |
This commitment is now in place. The contracts
team and the Designated Complaints Receiving Officer deal with provider
concerns or complaints. |
|||
Care Management and access to services must be become
more consistent across the Island
|
Common practice and policy guidelines (care management)
to continuously improved.
|
None |
JL |
Continuous process. To be revised following review
of adult services re-organisation (point 1 above) |
Care planning audit to demonstrate compliance
and to indicate areas for improvement |
Continuous file audits and audit of care plans
are in place. The contracts team audit the provider and users
experience to ensure that services are contracted for properly. Policy on compliance with service contracts will
be part of the contract portfolio to be published in April 2003 |
|||
Develop consistently high quality and reliable Homecare
services.
|
Develop a team based approach to providing informed and
consistent homecare to service users.
|
Support and evaluate the impact of team working
at Wightcare Services Homecare. Promote as a model through contracts. (See point 32 below) |
JL, EDC and PS |
Evaluate team working and other options by March
2003 |
Improve user stakeholder satisfaction and
demonstrate improvement through case audit. |
Evaluation is in progress; this has been delayed
until May 2003 to enable more robust data to be gathered. |
|||
Improve the consistency of case recording by staff, which
currently leads to misleading performance information and possible risk to
users.
|
Recording of activity to be subject to re-training and
improvements to the information system.
|
Casework audit to be included in new supervision
policies. |
JL and EDC |
Care planning audit to be undertaken by June
2002 |
Measurable improvement on audit undertaken in
1999 |
A new directorate database will assist in this
process. Current audit is manual and limited due to
continuous lack of capacity. File audits are carried out by supervisors and
findings reported to service managers. |
|||
|
|||||||||
Service response times should be improved and be subject
to clear reported standards.
|
The practice of fast-tracking less complex or single
service cases will be developed and implemented using clear and challenging
service standards, a common screening tool and the re-allocation of
responsibilities among staff.
|
The future development of the selected service
standards will be considered in the review of re-organisation in point 1
above |
JL |
See point 1 above |
Continuous improvement toward adult services
response standards. Piloting of service standards will result in targets
against the benchmark service standards. |
Fast tracking of less complex cases, having been
tried for 18 months, has not proved possible without staff increases. The government will shortly publish national response times and criteria, which will have to be adhered to. It is proposed that the service reverts to pre
2001 response time standards while working towards the new national standards
by December 2004. |
|||
Clarify And Promote Informed Public Understanding Of Eligibility Criteria For Care Services |
|||||||||
Improve stakeholder understanding of entitlement to
services to assessment and care.
|
DoH guidance on ‘Fair Access to Care’, criteria will be
applied as part of the Directorate Information Strategy
|
None at present |
JL |
Dates to be compliant with DoH requirements when
known |
Awaiting final guidance |
The implementation of the ‘Single Assessment
Process’ is not yet in place. This complex work is being led by the PCT.
Final implementation will be April 2005, with annual updates to the SHA, the
next being April 2003. The ‘Fair Access to Care’ guidance is
incorporated into ours development process. This is to be reviewe3d in April
2003. |
|||
Reduce continuing anxiety and possible confusion among
service users who are concerned that their care will be removed through
service cuts.
|
Clarify and define the role of Domestic Care.
Communicate with service users to allay fears
and clarify reasonable expectations. |
None Build effective communication with service users
into the Information Strategy |
JL and EDC |
By July 2002 Continuous (via the Information Strategy, see
point 2 above) |
Policy in place. Measurably improve user expectations regarding
their eligibility for services. |
Clarification of entitlement to care has taken
place within the existing eligibility criteria. Efforts to reduce misconceptions or
misunderstanding are a permanent aspect of the directorate’s information and communication
strategy. Focus groups in 2002 have shown less concern
about loss of services among existing users than similar groups during 2001. |
|||
The application of Eligibility Criteria and contract
terms by staff and service providers must be made more consistent.
|
Ensure equitable application of eligibility criteria and
contract terms through:
Supervision and audit. Provider consultation |
Casework audit to be part of improved
supervision practice. Audit of provider experience of services to be
undertaken by the contracting service. |
JL and EDC |
Continuous process. Audit of supervision
improvements by May 2003 |
Improved service provider satisfaction with
service consistency (survey). |
Audit is in progress (see 20 above). Focus groups and user surveys show that user
satisfaction levels are being maintained. |
|||
Improve The Range And Quality
Of Information Collected And Used By The Directorate
|
|||||||||
Managers and staff need performance reporting tools that
help to improve team and individual performance.
|
Implement a reporting process linked to team objectives
and with information in a suitable format for team and individual performance
review and planning.
|
Manual reporting arrangements to be negotiated
and continued until investment in database development is completed. |
EDC |
Improvements to information systems to be costed
and planned by September 2003 |
Implementation of team-based automatic reporting
of performance. |
The procurement of an improved directorate
database is a priority in the face of greater demands for reliable and safe
user and performance information. A project plan is in place, complimenting
the highly rated Local Information Plan required by the DoH. Funding remains
uncertain with future milestones difficult to identify. |
|||
Improvements and changes in the skills of staff and care
providers are needed to respond to changing needs.
|
Ensure that staff and service skills are updated and
improved to reflect needs.
|
Training to be prioritised and contained within
existing Training Plan funding any other possible grant sources |
JL and EDC |
Training Plan completed annually as required |
Measurable improvement in qualification levels
in staff and provider services. |
The strategic management group leads the
directorate-training plan. The current plan and preparation for 2003/04
focuses clearly on meeting identified needs including skills, qualification
training and professional development. Training is determined from national
and local priorities and from negotiation with staff. |
|||
Improvement is needed to adult services supervision and
quality assurance.
|
Apply a new and more rigorous supervision policy.
|
None |
JL |
May 2002. Review progress by May 2003 |
Draft policy in place. Audit improvement in
performance in May 2002, use as benchmark for future improvement. |
A new supervision policy is in place, but review
of effectiveness is limited by a lack of professional audit capacity. A
longer-term use of the policy is required than that set out in the plan, in
order to measure effectiveness. It is proposed that review takes place by May
2004. |
|||
The Council needs more consistent and reliable
information on the views of users and carers.
|
Establish partnership with a voluntary partner(s) who can
undertake regular and independent reporting on the service users experience
of services.
-Establish regular reporting of user and carer
views to members, managers and staff. |
An independent provider(s) may require funding
to approx £5,000 per annum to be found from existing revenue. |
JL (GB)
and EDC |
First contracts with provider to be in place by
June 2002. Other reporting arrangements to commence from
May to March 2003. Detailed timetable for user inclusion via the Information
Strategy (Point 2 above) |
Quarterly reporting of service user views from
independent and Directorate sources. |
Age Concern has been contracted to undertake
independent surveys of user satisfaction. This is in operation and
effectiveness will be reviewed before March 2003. This pilot arrangement will lead to quarterly
reporting to service management if the pilot is extended at review. |
|||
Improve the Directorate information systems to increase
efficiency, safeguard information and make the system safe for service users,
carers and partners.
|
Update and improve the Directorate client information
systems to include the increased use of networking and remote laptop computer
access to information.
|
Total Capital Investment in excess of £600,000
is required. |
EDC |
Investment decision required by Dec 2002 in
order to exploit grant funding and possible regional procurement opportunities |
The procurement and implementation of a new
information database and infrastructure. |
Improvement plan has been
submitted to the D.O.H and £89,000 grants monies received. Project proposals
presented to members and approved. Business case is being prepared and on
going discussions with region and our health partners are progressing.
Without financial resources of around 1 million pounds this project cannot
progress. See point 27 above. |
|||
Continue To Develop Effective
Links With Healthcare And Other Partner Organisations
|
|||||||||
Raise awareness of the need to work closely with other
agencies to provide consistent assessment and community care services.
|
Development of a ‘Care Team Approach’, through more inclusive training and
development events that bring together staff from health, social services,
housing and care providers. Service users and carers to be represented in training
planning and practice.
|
JL |
Appropriate staff to have been subject to
appropriate joint training by March 2003 |
All adult services joint training related events
to include healthcare based staff. |
Training has been offered to healthcare staff.
This is an evolving process, which reflects greater working together at
operational levels. The involvement of partners from other care and
housing providers will be part of the 2003/04 directorate-training plan, this
plan will be completed during March 2003. |
||||
Links with Primary Healthcare providers should be further
developed and improved.
|
Continuous development of primary healthcare attachment
and liaison.
Continue the development and evaluation of GP
attachment and self directed nursing and care teams. |
See point 32 above |
JL GB |
Continuous process in association with the
Primary Care Trust. Support external assessment of pilots, timescale
to be agreed with health partners. |
Improved stakeholder satisfaction and improved
performance against service standards (audit and survey). |
Out posting of staff to primary care is
continuing. A further post will be placed in a GP practice in 2003
(Freshwater). This is an evolving process based on partnerships that are
possible when opportunities arise. |
|||
Care providers can offer greater involvement in assessing
care needs and developing safer and more effective responses to need.
|
Increased use of joint assessment and review of need
involving service providers, fully involving service users, carers and
others.
|
None. Some joint training will be required to
establish new working relationships |
JL |
Long term development with policies and practice
guidelines in place by March 2003 |
Measurable increased stakeholder satisfaction
with effectiveness of care planning & safety and consistency of care (audit and survey). |
Progress in joint care assessment and planning
is being measured as part of the long term development, led by the PCT, which
will lead to the implementation of the Single Assessment Process in April
2005. |
|||
Improve the performance and value of community
Occupational Therapy and other allied services that promote independence.
|
Support the establishment of a Community Disability
Service and service standards based on the existing jointly managed OT
service.
Continue inter-agency development of the
existing Joint Aids and Equipment store |
Additional temporary Management capacity will
required to investigate, develop and implement further integration of health
and social community disability services. (est £40,000 consultancy and
management costs). Some capital may be required to develop the service (£n/a
at present) |
MH |
To be completed by 2004 (A deadline for further
joint aid services integration set by the DoH). |
The establishment of a joint service that meets
DoH requirements. Provide a service that equals or exceeds a benchmark
service identified during service development. |
A firm of consultants have been appointed to
develop a business plan for the development of a Community Disability
Service, including a joint OT service. There is as yet no clear estimate of the costs
of such integration, which remains a clear direction encouraged by the DoH.
The timescale remains 2004. |
|||
36 |
The independence of service users who are
recovering from illness or coping with disability will be improved by making
possible informed decisions about the strategies and equipment that can best
help them. |
Actively support partners able to develop an
Island Independent Living Centre, which could demonstrate and advise on aids
and adaptations, divert referrals and assist the development of a focus on
rehabilitation and independence. |
Not known, the voluntary sector is currently
exploring the provision of such a service and funding. The Council’s active
support and involvement will be required as part of a project plan. |
MH |
To be defined with voluntary partners. |
The opening of a Disability Living Centre. |
The directorate continues to support the
Disability Living Centre project planned by the Riverside Centre and
partners. This centre will be based on independent research undertaken during
the life of the council’s best value review of community care services. This
is being led by the Riverside Centre and is dependent on its gaining
resources. Integration of community equipment centre is on course for April
2004 |
||
C:\Workspace\BESTVAL\Review 2001\Comm Care Review\Com Care Report\Action Plan Final Update Jan 2003.doc