PAPER B
Purpose
: for Decision
REPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE
Date : 3 DECEMBER 2003
Title : WHITE
PAPER – “OUR FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICE”
REPORT OF THE PORTFOLIO HOLDER FOR
FIRE, EMERGENCY PLANNING AND CONSUMER PROTECTION
IMPLEMENTATION DATE : 15 December 2003
1.
The White
Paper sets out the Government’s national vision for the Fire and Rescue Service
of the future and how the Government intend this vision to be delivered. The Local Government Association has issued
guidance on developing regional management boards and their implications for
the modernisaton of the Fire and Rescue Service.
2.
This paper is
to introduce the contents of the White Paper to the Executive and to stimulate
debate upon its contents so that the Executive can consider how the Council
should address Fire Services’ modernisation.
3.
In particular
the Executive needs to consider its position regarding the proposed Regional
Management Board.
4.
To delegate
to the Portfolio Holder for Fire, Emergency Planning and Consumer Protection
the authority to negotiate with the South East Fire and Rescue Services Forum
over the proposal to establish a regional management structure for the fire and
rescue service.
5.
CONFIDENTIAL/EXEMPT
ITEMS
None.
6.
The White Paper - The key paragraphs from the White Paper are listed in
Appendix A. A full copy of the White Paper is available in the Members’ Room.
7.
The key
issues for this Authority are
8.
The size of
the Fire Authority - There are specified functions and duties, which every fire
authority has to fulfill no matter what its size. The White Paper questions whether such small fire authorities will
be viable in the future.
9.
Regional
Management Boards (RMB) - RMB’s to be responsible for delivering the following
in accordance with national policies:
“ensuring
resilience to emergencies, especially potential chemical, biological,
radiological or nuclear attacks;
specialist or
common services, where appropriate, such as fire investigation;
establishing
regional control rooms;
introducing
regional-based procurement to national standards;
developing
regional training strategies and delivery; and
introducing
regional personnel management and human resources management functions;
10.
The proposed
draft constitution for the South East Fire and Rescue Services, Regional
Management Board has been made available in the Members’ Room.
This draft was tabled at a meeting on 31
October2003 at which Councillor Knowles represented the Isle of Wight Council.
11.
The Local
Government Association has published detailed guidance on Developing Regional
Management Boards for Fire Authorities (copies are available in the Members’
Room).
12.
The
Governments determination for change to happen within the White Paper and
subsequently on various public Platforms the Government has stressed its
determination for change to happen.
13.
The CPA
process for Fire and Rescue Authorities - Currently, there are trials of the
Comprehensive Performance Assessment (CPA) being undertaken in 4 fire
authorities. These trials will be
followed by 4 more next Spring. Then
following consultation and subsequent revision the first CPA inspection will commence
in January 2005.
14.
The Councils
Corporate Plan - The Councils Corporate Plan acknowledges that the various
Local Government Acts since 1999 have set the direction of change for the
Council. This White Paper sets the direction
of change for the Fire and Rescue Service.
15.
The Corporate
Plan sets out the Councils commitment to working in partnership with other
public sector agencies. We have an
objective to “promote and deliver services which are sustainable in economic,
social and environment terms.” We state
that we will “continue to develop new models of service delivery particularly
through partnership arrangements with other agencies.” And, “Extend the use of
pooled budgets’ and joint delivery with other agencies”.
16.
The White
Paper gives us the opportunity to put all of the above into practice. However, the Corporate Plan also commits the
Council to “support the continued provision of a locally controlled, managed
and delivered fire service” and particularly to “provide and maintain an Island
Fire and Rescue Service supported by a locally based emergency Control Room.
17.
The key issue
for the Fire Authority with regard to the Corporate Plan is to find a way
forward that takes into account the significant changes to the national
framework for the Fire and Rescue Service as set out in the White Paper.
18.
The Fire and
Public Safety Select Committee considered the White Paper at its meeting on 14
July 2003 and resolved that:
19.
“In the event that the Government pursue the
White Paper then this Committee would wish to see the Isle of Wight set up as a
sub-region”.
20.
The Fire Brigades’ Union, the local pressure group
“Our Fire Service” and the Retained Firefighters Union were invited to put
their views on the White Paper to the Fire and Public Safety Select Committee
on 10 November 2003. The Select
Committee resolved to recommend to the Executive
(i)
THAT the Control Room should be maintained on the
Island and any attempts to relocate it to the mainland be resisted.
(ii)
THAT consideration be given to the impact of combining
the Control Room with the Ambulance Service on the Island.
21.
There are a number of costs which are incurred in
being a stand alone Fire Authority.
These can in some instances be offset to some extent by collaborating
with other Fire Authorities.
22.
The budget bids for 2004/05 are detailed in the Fire
and Rescue Services’, Service Plan.
Additionally there are two other areas where costs might or will be
incurred: Regional Management Boards and Control Room provision.
23.
Regional Management Board - Costs will be incurred in
two areas: the costs of administering the RMB and the costs associated with
delivering the outcomes required in the 6 areas of responsibility allocated to
the RMB. At this stage it its
impossible to estimate what these costs would be or how they would be
apportioned.
24.
Control Room Provision - The Best Value Fundamental
Review of Control and Communications identified that there would be costs
attached to combining Fire Control with other public services on the Island.
25.
The following is an extract from Option 2 of the 2001
Review:
Main
Budget Issues
The
budget will be the approved budget including development issues as determined by
the Isle of Wight Council. There will
be initial building costs or renovation costs plus the provision of
communication and technology infrastructure, together with project management
and reinstatement/transference of existing equipment.
New
Building Cost - Approximately £550,000
to £650,000
(this is based on an industrial unit)
Renovation
Cost - Approximately £220,000
without
fittings.
Leasing - Approximately £35,000
for an
industrial unit, plus one off payment to
fit out.
-
Approximately £77,000 for office type
accommodation plus one off payment
to fit out.
Communications
and Technology Infrastructure Provision – (cost not available.)
Moving
the computerised mobilising system - £30,000 – not including radio.
26.
The Fire and Rescue Service radio schemes throughout the U.K are
being replaced by 2006/07 free of charge by the Office of the Deputy Prime
Minister. It is not clear if the same
patronage would be available for a non-fire/fire collaboration. In the likely event of the Ambulance/Fire
Services having to procure their own Radio System Members’ were informed in
Paper A - Fire and Rescue Service
Scoping Studies at the Fire and Emergency Planning Committee on 15 September
1999 that an alternative radio scheme would likely be in the region of
£146,000. The figures will need to be updated and are likely to be higher.
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS
27.
The power to establish a joint management board exists
under s13 Local Government Act 2000 and ss102 and 102 Local Government Act
1972. The penalty for failure to
embrace the national proposals could include intervention by the Secretary of
State and, ultimately, the removal of functions of the fire authority from the
local authority.
28.
In exercising delegated authority, the Portfolio
Holder must act consistently with the Corporate Plan, unless one of the
constitutional devices to change, or
act outside of, that plan is invoked.
29.
To note the Government’s modernising agenda for the
Fire and Rescue Service as outlined in the White Paper, but observe the
tensions between that agenda and established corporate strategic priorities.
30.
To reject the modernising agenda and opt out of
negotiations to create a South East Fire and Rescue Service Regional Management
Board.
31.
To become a full member of the South East Fire and
Rescue Service Regional Management Board.
32.
To become a full member of the South East Fire and
Rescue Service Regional Management Board but with the proviso that at any time
this Fire Authority can opt out of any particular policy the Regional
Management Board adopts.
33.
To authorise the Portfolio Holder for Fire, Emergency
Planning and Consumer Protection, to negotiate and in particular by pressing
the case for (i) the establishment of a Regional Management Board which best
reflects the established strategic priorities set out in the Corporate Plan and
(ii) the recommendations of the Select Committee particularly, to pursue the
objectives of
§
Sub Regional Status
§
Maintaining a Control Room on the Island
§
Combining the Control Room with the Ambulance Service
on the Island
34.
As with any
issue there are risks for the Council as the White Paper is implemented. The Government
is hopeful that voluntary arrangements for Regional Management Boards will
succeed, if not they intend to use their powers (either the existing or new) to
intervene or combine Fire Authorities.
35.
There is a
significant risk that if the Isle of Wight does not participate in the Regional
Management Board or at some stage withdraws from the RMB, then the Government
will intervene, which could adversely affect the Council ‘s CPA score in the
future, or cause combinations of fire authorities.
36.
Whilst signing
up to this arrangement we would have to accept the 6 issues for the Board to
consider these are:
Procurement
Training
Common Services
Human Resources
CCBRN
Control Rooms
37.
There is a risk
to the Fire Authority that if we do not sign up to the wider agenda the Fire
CPA score would reflect this and impact upon our overall CPA score.
38.
The agenda
for change is wide-ranging and extensive.
Some of the measures will be costly for instance I.P.D.S. and there is a
risk that unless we collaborate within the Regional Management Board the
Council will not be able to provide the resources to take the agenda forward as
required.
39.
There is a
risk that the Island has insufficient capacity to take the agenda forward if we
do not collaborate and that we will be judged as failing by the Service
Improvement Team and suffer intervention as a consequence.
40.
On 24
September 2003 the Executive approved the Fire Authority Integrated Risk
Management Plan (FAIRMaP) and Improvement Plan to go out for public
consultation. This consultation process
is currently underway and is due to finish in December 2003.
41.
The responses
to the consultation exercise will be reported to the Executive who will then
consider the responses as the decision is made on how to implement the FAIRMaP
and Improvement Programme.
42.
The FAIRMaP
will therefore be a document written for the Island and owned by the whole
Island and all this is because the Isle of Wight Council is the Fire Authority
for the Island. If the Island were to
become part of some larger Combined Fire Authority then significantly the
Island will have lost the power to set its own FAIRMaP and thus fire protection
for the Island would be determined within the context of such a larger Combined
Fire Authority’s overall priorities. It
is highly likely that within any Combined Fire Authority area there will be
areas at higher risk from fire than exist on the Island.
RECOMMENDATIONS 43.
To note the Government’s modernising agenda for the
Fire and Rescue Service as outlined in the White Paper, and observe the
tensions between that agenda and established corporate strategic priorities. 44.
To authorise the Portfolio Holder for Fire,
Emergency Planning and Consumer Protection to negotiate and in particular by
pressing the case for (i)
the establishment of a Regional Management Board
which best reflects the established strategic priorities set out in the
Corporate Plan and, (ii)
the recommendations of the Select Committee
particularly, to pursue the objectives of § Sub regional status§
Maintaining a control room on the Island §
Combining the Control Room with the Ambulance
Service on the Island |
45.
The White Paper “Our Fire and Rescue Service” ODPM.
46.
Appendix A.
Contact
Point : Richard Hards, Chief
Fire Officer. 01983 823199,
richard.hards@
iow.gov.uk
R
HARDS Chief
Fire Officer |
D
KNOWLES Portfolio
Holder for Fire Emergency Planning and Consumer Protection |
1.6 “Our
vision is for a public sector fire and rescue service that:
— is proactive in preventing fires and other risks, rather than
simply reacting to fires; — acts in support of the Government’s wider agenda of social inclusion, neighbourhood renewal and crime reduction; — has effective institutions that support its role and purpose; — is well managed and effective; and — is committed
to developing and adapting to changing
circumstances, including the growing threat of terrorism”. |
3.10 “We will consider the results
of that research in the forthcoming review of the Building Regulations”.
Page 21 3.12 “We have already
consulted on proposals to reform fire safety
legislation by
means of a Regulatory Reform Order”.
3.23 “In addition, we have also
set out our plans to ensure there is a robust legislative framework to increase
our national resilience and capability to respond to terrorist and other
threats. These proposals are set out in
the Civil Contingencies Bill”.
A wider role of the service
3.25
“recognising the service’s growing role in
preventative work, response to road traffic accidents and in non-fire related
emergencies (such as terrorist incidents), we will legislate to put this work
on a proper statutory footing. We will
also rationalise fire safety legislation”.
“We will replace
them with a simpler fire safety regime”.
Page
25 A modern approach to risk:
Integrated Risk Management Planning
3.26
“We will establish a new statutory framework which
will replace a responsibility on the fire and rescue service to plan for, and
respond to, a range of emergencies on the basis of risk assessment and
management. These new requirements will
be brought together in the Integrated Risk Management Plans (IRMPs),
which each fire authority will be required to produce”.
Page
26 3.29 “We will require locally generated plans for preventing and
responding
to fires and other emergencies, based on an
assessment
of risk”.
“We
will support and guide the fire service through this process
with
technical advice”.
3.30 “Authorities
will take on new responsibilities for making
judgements
about the risks within their area”.
4.
National, regional and local responsibilities
Page
28 4.1 “We will set the national strategic direction for the
service and
ensure
that it is underpinned by a structure that can deliver
that
strategy”.
“There
must be regional co-ordination mechanisms to ensure
that
those changes are delivered”.
“as
and when elected regional assemblies are established, we
will
transfer responsibility from the existing fire authorities in
those
areas to new regional fire and rescue authorities”.
4.3
“also because of the quality of strategic and
operational leadership provided by fire authorities over… Innovation and change
has been hindered by restrictive central prescription”.
4.4
“In essence, there are too many small fire
authorities, which struggle to provide a cost-effective service because of
their size. Authorities range from a
few hundred staff in the Isle of Wight to about 7,000 in London. Several authorities have only around 500
staff. 14 have less than 700. It will become increasingly difficult for
such small authorities to deliver the more efficient service required. The number of authorities makes it difficult
for them to co-ordinate action effectively, as the recent industrial dispute
has highlighted. And the small size of
many of them makes it difficult to achieve economies of scale”.
Page
30 The national perspective
4.11
“We propose therefore to provide a new National
Framework
for
the service to bring together all the expectations and
requirements
which central government has on behalf of the
nation
generally”.
“We will produce
and keep up to date a ‘National Fire and Rescue Framework’ “.
4.12 “This Framework will provide
the context for the overall work and direction of the service. It will set out:
what outcomes the Government expects the service to achieve in the light of the proposed new statutory role;
how the service
should undertake specific functions, where this is necessary for reasons of
national efficiency (Normally, we would not expect to tell fire and rescue
authorities how to run their service.
But there will be some areas where, from time to time, the Government
does need to set parameters about how things should be done – such as the
procurement of communications systems, where setting a national specification
can ensure inter-operability with other brigades and emergency services); and
the financial and
other support that the Government will provide, such a technical advice,
research co-ordination and expertise, and the contribution of the Fire Service
College”.
Page
31
Current arrangementsNational level Standards on recruitment, training
and development, some delivery Inspection/good practice guidance Research and development Pay negotiations Decisions on operational
capacity (Section 19 of the Fire
Service Act 1947) Some training New Dimension/Firelink Local level Day-to-day delivery Control rooms Recruitment and initial
training Some other training Civil contingencies
planning Community engagement Procurement |
Proposed arrangementsNational level National Framework Standard on recruitment,
training and development, some delivery Inspection/good practice guidance Research and development Technical support, eg
estates, communications Pay negotiations Procurement (at least of major purchases) Some training New Dimension/Firelink Regional levelControl rooms Civil Contingencies planning Recruitment and initial training Common services, eg response to chemical, biological, radiological
and nuclear attacks Decisions on operational capacity (risk management planning) Health and safety planning Procurement Local levelDay-to-day delivery (prevention and response) Community engagement Some decisions on operational capacity (risk management planning) |
4.13
“We expect that fire authorities will recognise the
national
significance
of the requirements and”.
“The
Government will take reserve powers only to ensure that
an
authority acts in accordance with the National Framework”.
Page 33 “But in the
interim period, and in those areas that do not
choose
to have an elected regional assembly, another model
is
needed now to manage a range of regional”.
4.17 “local fire authorities will
therefore be required to establish, before 1 April 2004, robust regional management
arrangements with members from existing fire authorities”.
Regional Management Boards to take responsibility for delivering the following in accordance with national policies.
“ensuring
resilience to emergencies, especially potential chemical,
biological, radiological or nuclear attacks;
specialist or
common services, where appropriate, such as fire investigation;
establishing
regional control rooms;
introducing
regional-based procurement to national standards;
developing
regional training strategies and delivery; and
introducing
regional personnel management and human resources management functions”.
4.18 “We will discuss with
existing authorities, the Local Government Association and other stakeholders this
system of regional management to ensure that it meets the objectives of the
National Framework. We hope that such
voluntary arrangements will succeed.
But if these arrangements do not deliver modernisation quickly, we will
use our powers to require combinations of fire authorities, in order to
establish regional fire and rescue authorities”.
Page 40 Strategic development
5.9
“We will therefore wind up the CFBAC. We will repeal the
provisions
of the Fire Service Act 1947 requiring the
establishment
of the CFBAC”.
5.10
“That is why we will establish, quickly, a Service
Improvement Team”.
— To act as a catalyst for change, promoting
reform and working with
Page 41 all
fire and rescue service institutions to ensure change happens. In particular,
to ensure that the change of focus to
prevention takes place.
To monitor the
overall rate of change, to report to ministers and the wider public on that progress and thereby
highlight any problems or concerns.
To ensure that the
overall strategic direction of all the institutions is focused on the programme
of reform and change in a coherent way (as opposed to the current disjointed
institutional framework)”.
Quality assurance
5.11
“First, the Audit Commission will take over the role
of quality assurance and inspection, at regional and local levels”.
Page 42 5.14 “Second, we will reform the Fire Service College”.
5.15
“Therefore, we intend to reform and redirect the
work of the Inspectorate so that it is a smaller and more efficient body. It will, in future, have three distinct
functions:
Fire research
5.16
“We will therefore support an invigorated programme
of fire-related research which”.
Page 43 Practitioners’ Forum
5.17
“We intend to give the lead in this new and
challenging role to
the
Chief and Assistant Chief Fire Officers’ Association
(CACFOA)”.
Page
46 The role of central government
6.5
“Therefore, we will set out the standards that
authorities should meet in terms of, for example:
procurement of equipment
to consistent standards;
rationalisation
of training and development; and
preparation for
handling chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear incidents”.
6.6
“However, the Government has a clear responsibility
to intervene if necessary to deal with failing services and inadequate
performance”.
6.9
“We are asking the Audit Commission to work with use
and
other
stakeholders to develop a performance assessment framework, using the lessons
from local government CPA, as the basis for assessing the performance of fire
and rescue authorities and their services, and for improvement planning. This
framework will also form the basis for determining which fire and rescue
authorities merit increased freedoms and flexibilities as a result of
consistently good performance as measured against the tough national targets
which we will set”.
Page 48 Inspection
6.12
“The CPA and the new inspection regime will have
three overriding objectives. It will:
scrutinise independently
the performance of fire and rescue authorities and the service as a whole, and
it will produce public reports setting out the strengths and weaknesses of each
– this will include the extent to which each has developed its preventative
systems and measures;
provide a
baseline for improvement planning to support improved standards, greater
co-operation and more efficient use of resources within the fire and rescue
service and between the emergency services where appropriate; and
support greater
freedom and flexibilities for high performers, targeting inspection and other
capacity support measures in accordance with risk, identifying and dealing with
poor performance”.
Page
50 7.2 “Fire authorities are, and will remain, employers of
the fire and
Rescue
service locally”.
7.4
“Members of authorities will need more specific
training in risk assessment and management”.
7.14 Finally, we intend to take powers to give
guidance to any
negotiating
body which it would have to take into account in its
work”.
Page 54 7.28 “We expect more collaborative working on such issues
as
human resource management or procurement, or more
widely,
as
fire and rescue authorities recognise that they have shared or overlapping
objectives which can best be achieved by working with other services and
organisations”.
Page 57 8.6 “This year we
have formally approved a new system of training
and development, based on
national standards and a framework of skills and competencies – the ‘Integrated
Personal Development System’, or IPDS”.
8.19
“We will tackle the high level of ill-health
retirement and ensure that the system is not open to abuse. We have already issued guidance on measures
to improve the management of ill-health.
broaden the
definition of the term ‘fire fighter’ to allow a wider range of those
employed
in the service to remain in the pension scheme;
place an obligation
on fire and rescue authorities to use independent medical assessment before
approving applications for early retirements on ill-health grounds;
introduce
alternative arrangements for local authority funding of service pensions, in
consultation with the fire and rescue authorities; and
introduce a new
scheme more suited to the service of the future and reflecting changes in the
relevant tax and regulatory framework on which there is already public
consultation”.
8.21 “We will abolish
the current discipline regulations”.
8.23 “We believe that the
disputes machinery should be reformed
along
the lines of ACAS guidance”.
Page 66 9.12 “We will ensure that fire
and rescue authorities and their
managers
have the necessary flexibility and freedoms to make decisions in the best
interest of local communities”.
Page 70 — We will work with the Audit
Commission to establish the new Comprehensive Performance Assessment framework
for monitoring and inspecting fire and rescue service performance.
We will work with
the Local Government Association and other key stakeholders, including
individual local authorities, to set out the immediate tasks needed to
introduce regional management boards, the timetable and process for
establishing them in the different regions, and how the details of the
structure and membership should be determined in each region.
10.8
“The new Service Improvement Team will be
responsible for driving the process of change forward. Its remit will be:
to monitor
progress on the delivery of the agenda set out in this White Paper;
to report
systematically and regularly to the Deputy Prime Minister and other ministers,
as necessary, on progress;
to report
publicly on progress – via the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister’s web site –
so that the process of change is open and transparent;
to identify any
areas of slippage in the reform programme and to offer support in addressing
and tackling shortcomings or failings;
to ensure that
the new institutional framework is put in place and that it operates in the
flexible non-bureaucratic way envisaged; and
to champion and encourage change in all parts of the service”.