PAPER D2

 

Purpose : For Decision

 

Committee:     EXECUTIVE

 

Date:               24 SEPTEMBER 2002

 

Title:                NEWPORT PEDESTRIANISATION – TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENTS

 

                        REPORT OF THE PORTFOLIO HOLDER FOR TRANSPORT

 

 

SUMMARY

 

To consider the outcome of consultation carried out on the proposals to reduce traffic passing through Newport, improve public transport access and pedestrianise sections of the High Street.

 

BACKGROUND

 

Council policy documents, Unitary Development Plan and five year Local Transport Plan identified the opportunities for the introduction of Town Centre Traffic Management schemes as a method of enhancing pedestrian safety and improving the shopping environment.

 

The Council commission transport consultants Mott MacDonald’s to carry out a detailed transport study of Newport, and using this information examine the possibility of putting in place the above policies. Six potential, schemes were examined by the Environment and Transport Select Committee, who recommended that four of the six options be taken forward for public consultation.

 

Consultation

 

Extensive consultation was carried out through the distribution of some 20,000 leaflet/questionnaires, fixed and touring displays, public meetings, press adverts, interactive pages on the Council’s website and detailed radio and press coverage. 

 

Evaluation of the initial consultation highlighted a number of concerns including:

 

·         The number, size and speed of vehicles currently traveling through the town and immediate surrounding area.

·         Concern was raised over pedestrian safety both within the town and nearby streets.

·         Potential loss of parking.

·         Access and parking for the disabled and people with mobility problems.

·         Problems of delivery and essential access.

·         The desire to maintain public transport access.

·         The impact of constructing a link road from Mill Street to Foxes Way, near Sainsbury’s. 

 

A further option, (option E) was developed to address the issues and concerns identified through consultation. The Environment and Transport Select Committee considered this option at their meeting on 29 May 2002, where they recommended to the Executive Committee that this option be approved, subject to further consultation with residents of Pyle Street, Trafalgar Road and Crocker Street. 

 

Public meetings were as a result held on 26 June 2002 for Pyle Street Residents and 2 September 2002, for people from Crocker Street and Trafalgar Road.


 

The response from these meetings echoed the feed back from the earlier consultation, with regards to concerns over the speed and size of vehicles traveling through the town, worries of pedestrian safety, access for disabled, loss of parking.  Particular concerns were raised to the proposal to use Pyle Street as an alternative to the High Street.

 

As a result of this consultation a further option has now been developed which will retain the High Street as a vehicular route, whilst at the same time improve traffic management and pedestrian safety.

 

Proposal

 

The Proposal will:

 

Conclusion

 

The above option will provide significant environmental, safety and traffic management improvements for the town.  This can be considered as stage one of a two-stage process to achieve increased pedestrian safety.  Stage two; full pedestrianisation can only be put in place if an adequate alternative traffic route is made available to accommodate displaced traffic flows from the High Street.

 

Human Rights Act

 

In placing this paper before the committee consideration has been given to the rights set out in Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and Article 1 of the First Protocol (right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

 

The impact that these schemes might have on the owners/occupiers of other property in the area and other third parties has been carefully considered. Whilst it is not anticipated that there will be any interference with the rights of these people there nevertheless needs to be a balance between the Council's aim to improve the economic well being of Newport town centre and public safety within the town. Insofar as there is an interference with the rights of others it is considered necessary for the protection of the rights and freedoms of the community as a whole. It is also considered that such an action is proportional to the legitimate aim and in the public interest.

 

Crime and Disorder Act

 

The Council has consulted the Isle of Wight Crime and Disorder Facilitator and Architectural Liaison Officer, with regard to the reduction of crime through design.  He would be interested to see the details of any scheme and in particular the layout of street furniture and carriageway/pavement treatment.  It is intended that any scheme will increase pedestrian safety and deter crime and disorder. 

 

The details of any scheme will be developed in conjunction with English Heritage and colleagues from the crime and disorder and urban design teams.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

 

The cost of implementing the above option is likely to be in the order of £600,000 and will be met from existing Highways capital settlement.

  

OPTIONS

 

  1. That the above option be approved.

 

  1. To take no further action.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Option 1 above is approved.

 

 

BACKGROUND PAPERS

 

Local Transport Plan 2001-2006 (E1.1. and E.1.3)

Unitary Development Plan 1996 –2011 (Policy TR 14)

Minutes & Agenda for Environment & Transportation Select Committee November 2000

Minutes & Agenda for Environment & Transport Select Committee May 2002.

 

CONTACT POINT

 

Chris Wells, Engineering Services F 823777

 

  

M J A FISHER

Strategic Director

Corporate and Environment Services

E FOX

Portfolio Holder for Transport