PAPER B
Purpose : for Decision
REPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE
Date : 21
MAY 2003
Title : OFFICES
ENTERPRISE HOUSE, ST CROSS, NEWPORT
REPORT OF THE PORTFOLIO HOLDER FOR RESOURCES
IMPLEMENTATION
DATE : 3
June 2003
1.
This
report brings to the Executive recommendations for the letting of Enterprise
House, Newport, including sub-letting arrangements, use of the property for
Council training and on-going marketing.
2.
Although the subject of Enterprise
House does not appear in the current Forward Plan Members will be aware that
Enterprise House has been offered for lease for some time. Because of that marketing exercise it is
difficult to know precisely when an offer would be received but this has now
happened. The company putting forward
their offer would like a decision as soon as possible and would prefer to be
operating by 1 July 2003. By waiting
for the next Forward Plan to be written then a report would not be programmed
until 4 June. The proposals set out in
this report have been considered by the Accommodation Task Group in its review
of corporate office accommodation.
3.
The
offices of Enterprise House comprise of some 10,000 square feet of space and
are leased to the Isle of Wight Partnership for 15 years from January 2001 at a
rent of £135,000 per annum subject to rent reviews every five years. The Isle of Wight Council is guarantor for
the rent and Members may recall that when the decision was made to provide this
guarantee it was on the basis that the starting rent was a build cost rent and
that encouragement should be given to developing the St Cross area to bring
forward high standard and quality accommodation previously not available on the
Isle of Wight. Now almost 2½ years on,
the passing rent of £13.20 per square foot is being caught up with other market
rents in the order of £12.50 per square foot.
However, Enterprise House probably still remains the best office space
on the Island and as such leads the field in terms of quality facilities and
services available.
4.
In
January 2002, the Isle of Wight Partnership working in conjunction with the
Council decided to consolidate the Partnership’s operations into the adjoining
Innovation Centre leaving Enterprise House vacant. As with any such on-going lease arrangements, the options were to
re-use the property, assign the lease or sub-let all or part of the property.
5.
Since
April 2002, the property has been offered for rent on the open market through
mainland and local agents in the hope that it might be possible to attract
inward investment to the Island or alternatively provide accommodation for a
local company seeking to expand.
Running parallel with this marketing exercise, the Council has explored
its own options for use of all or part of these offices by an in-house Council
service.
6.
Unfortunately,
whilst the marketing exercise has not brought forward a company seeking to
relocate to the Island, several local firms have indicated an interest in the
property and have been asked to put forward their best and final offers.
7.
The
best offer to be received is from Douglas Stafford International Ltd. The company is looking to take over all the
first floor of the property and will pay a rent of £70,000 per annum, subject
to a rent holiday for the first six months.
The proposed lease would be for ten years commencing as soon as
possible.
8.
This
company has been on the Island for over seven years having chosen to relocate
to the Island from Northampton. The
company provides exhaustive market research for major car manufacturers and
suppliers in both the United Kingdom and North America. The company currently has 34 employees and
is investing in a significant expansion of the company’s market research work,
training and support to its clients which will include a further 5-8 new
employees. The Directors of the company have wide experience in their field and
have sufficient confidence and financial support to expand the company and are
happy to maintain that expansion on the Island. The replacement of the company’s existing offices in Shanklin is
a key part of this strategy and the first floor offices at Enterprise House fit
well with the re-branding now underway.
9.
There
will be a need to be an underlease to be granted by the Isle of Wight
Partnership who would maintain the existing 15 year lease and the Council would
still stay as guarantor for that rent until January 2006.
10.
The
owner of the property will need to give consent for this sub-letting and it is
understood that such consent would be forthcoming.
11.
After
sub-leasing the first floor, this provides an opportunity to consider the
remainder of the ground floor, approximately half of which is already set out
for conferencing and training with the latest technology installed. This provides an excellent chance to
relocate the Council’s training from Bugle House, Newport, and that service is
currently apportioned on costs for the space leased in the centre of
Newport. This cost is £25,000 per annum
based on 43% of the floor area.
12.
This
arrangement would also fit well with the accommodation review policy and has
been agreed with members of the Accommodation Task Group. By vacating part of Bugle House, it will
provide space for the setting up of the initial call centre by September this
year.
13.
In
addition this will provide a significant opportunity to consolidate all
training throughout the organisation.
At the present time the Council as an organisation is spending in excess
of £20,000 per annum hiring premises for training and similar activities due to
the lack of capacity at the Bugle. In
the future all training facilities should be organised through the Training
Manager and in the first instance Enterprise House should be the preferred
option with costs being apportioned accordingly to provide a discount upon the
current expenditure. The rent to be
apportioned to training at Enterprise House for the ground floor would be
£34,000 per annum plus £12,000 per annum for outgoings with the initial lease
period to run until January 2006.
14.
The
remainder of the ground floor will continue to be offered for lease on the open
market and the Council’s agent believes that because of the size it should
attract good local interest and the passing rent would be sought at £32,000 per
annum.
CONSULTATION
15.
In
bringing forward this proposal, consultations have been on-going with the Isle
of Wight Partnership, the Council’s agents and the members of the Accommodation
Task Group.
16.
No
objections have been received to the proposals set out.
FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPLICATIONS
17.
By
sub-letting these offices, the Council will be reducing its liability in terms
of the rent obligation amounting to some £135,000 per annum. The Council will also in effect be granting
a local company a one-off rent concession of some £35,000. It is understood that this has only been
recommended following extensive advertising and on the basis that this is the
best arrangement available to the Council.
18.
In
terms of training, the Council is presently incurring some £25,000 per annum
providing a training facility at Bugle house, and at least another £20,000 per
annum hiring other premises when Bugle House is unavailable or has insufficient
capacity. Relocating the training
service to Enterprise House and making it the preferred option for Council
training should balance use of the existing resources.
19.
A
further one-off cost estimated at £10,500 will be required to upgrade
Training’s ICT link. It is proposed
that this be funded from the ring-fenced accommodation review budget.
20.
Copies
of the company’s accounts have been received and are considered satisfactory.
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS
21.
The
Isle of Wight Partnership solicitors will need to set up new sub-lease
arrangements and confirm the landlord’s consent.
OPTIONS
(a)
That
the Council fund six months’ rent for the named new sub-tenant at Enterprise
House at an amount of £35,000 and the Council take a sub-lease from the Isle of
Wight Partnership for training purposes of the ground floor premises for the
remaining period of the rent guarantee term. That the Isle of Wight Partnership
be recommended to continue to market the remaining offices at Enterprise House.
(b)
That
the Council and the Isle of Wight Partnership continue to market the
availability of all the offices at Enterprise House in the hope that one tenant
can be found for all the accommodation.
(c)
That
the Council take over all the offices at Enterprise House for one of the
Council’s own operations.
22.
In
guaranteeing the rent for the Isle of Wight Partnership, the Council has always
been at risk in the catch-up period between the initial at build cost rent and
the trend in market rents on the Island.
Clearly this gap has almost closed but this will still continue to
depend on local economic activity and confidence in the market place. The Council is also at risk in providing a
rent support to a young evolving local company when that company is beginning
to grow. The usual references have been
obtained in respect of Douglas Stafford International Ltd as well as reports
and financial statements of the company’s operations and there is nothing to
suggest or indicate that the Council would not be acting reasonably in pursuing
the grant of a sub-lease at this time.
23.
This
matter is a commercial decision and given the time taken to market the property
throughout the region and locally and given that the offer now put forward has
been tested is the best available in the market place today.
24.
In
terms of the Council’s corporate strategy, progressing Enterprise House in
terms of the proposals set out meets with the agenda for employment and
economic promotion on the Island as well as the best use of resources.
25.
There
are no apparent human rights or equalities issues in this case that need to be
brought to Members’ attention.
26.
Directors
of the Partnership have considered the ongoing management of Enterprise House
and because existing staff resources are committed, Directors have asked that
Property Services take on the management of Enterprise House as part of their
day-to-day management of property.
RECOMMENDATIONS 27.
That Option (a) be adopted. |
BACKGROUND PAPERS
28.
Policy
Committee – 3 April 2000.
Contact Point : Tony Flower, ( 823263, e-mail: [email protected]
M J A FISHER Chief Executive Officer and
Strategic Director of Corporate Services |
R R BARRY Portfolio Holder for
Resources |