PAPER H
Purpose : For Decision
Committee
: EXECUTIVE
Date : 21 MAY 2002
Title : BEST VALUE REVIEW OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
PORTFOLIO HOLDER – ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, UK AND EU, REGIONAL ISSUES
SUMMARY/PURPOSE
To present the Best Value Review report for decision. Copies of the Summary Report and Service Improvement Plan have already been circulated. Please bring your copy to the meeting.
BACKGROUND
This Review was carried out in the 2nd
year of the Council’s Best Value Review Programme, at the same time as the
reviews of Tourism and Beaches. The Review included consultation with a wide
range of stakeholders, through a Challenge Day, the MORI Citizens’ Panel,
interviews and questionnaires. The results of this consultation has confirmed
that the service is considered to be very important, with generally high levels
of satisfaction in terms of the quality of delivery. Areas for improvement have
been highlighted and these are reflected in the options summarised below.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Strategic Development.
The full financial implications of
options 1 - 4 have not been assessed. There are no additional financial
implications arising from the recommended option 5 that have not been
incorporated into the current years budget.
Operational Matters.
The financial implications relating
to the recommended individual improvement actions are set out in the Service
Improvement Plan. These should be considered against historically low levels of
funding, (around ½ the average for England and Wales as at 1999/2000), the
recent doubling of expenditure locally and the need to compare our £1million
expenditure on Tourism on a like for like basis.
OPTIONS
Strategic Development
1 cessation
of the service
2 continued
delivery through IWEP (the ‘no change’ option)
3 transfer
of the service to another external provider
4 bringing
the service back in house
5 joint
Council / IWEP delivery of service
Operational Matters
These actions can be grouped into 3
broad areas
1 Establishing
a sustainable organisational structure for service delivery
-
Implementation of the IWEP ‘recovery plan’
- Securing additional funding for the service from the Council and other agencies
-
Development of a Partnership Protocol to support service delivery under
the new ‘federal’ delivery
model
2 Maintaining
and Improving Performance
-
Sharpening the strategic focus of the service
- Improved work programme management to ensure a better match between stakeholder expectations of the service and available resources
3 Establishing
an effective monitoring and evaluation framework
-
Revision of the Service Level
Agreement between the IWEP and the Council
- Development of a Monitoring and Evaluation
Strategy
-
Development of an annual work programme
RECOMMENDATIONS
Option 5 has been agreed as being the most appropriate solution for
achievement of the Council’s objectives and continuation is recommended i.e.
with the IWEP responsible for the delivery of the service and the Council
responsible for advising strategic policy matters, bid development and
research.
Contact Point : John Bentley, F 823346
A KAYE Strategic Director, Education and Community Development |
H REES Portfolio Holder - Economic Development, UK and EU, Regional Issues |