PAPER D2
Purpose: for Decision
Date: 19
NOVEMBER 2002
Title: APPROVAL
OF PROCUREMENT STRATEGY
REPORT OF THE PORTFOLIO HOLDER FOR RESOURCES
IMPLEMENTATION DATE: 29 NOVEMBER 2002
1. Procurement is a wide-ranging
topic that increasingly is seen as a vital component of effective service
delivery. Indeed, all local authorities are being actively encouraged by the
Government to develop and improve their procurement practices and policies. In
response to this, a Procurement Strategy for the Isle of Wight Council has been
produced recently, which seeks to provide an effective framework for achieving
significant improvements in the Council’s approach to procurement. The strategy
identifies a number of important threads of procurement activity and can only
become truly effective with the high level support of the organisation
itself. Hence the Executive is being requested to approve the implementation of the
strategy and its accompanying action plan.
BACKGROUND
3.
The
need for a Council-wide strategy for procurement has been recognised for some
time; indeed the finalisation/implementation of our Procurement Strategy does
feature as one of the CPA Inspectors’ (preliminary) recommendations arising
from the corporate assessment process.
The strategy itself is a reasonably
ambitious medium-term plan, which recognises that in reality we start from a fairly low base as regards a strategic
focus on procurement. Key challenges are to develop the necessary capacity to
support and deliver the potential benefits, and to effectively embed the
strategy into individual Service Plans and everyday working practices.
4. The Procurement Strategy itself is intended to help achieve step change in improving procurement practice within the Isle of Wight Council.
5.
The
Procurement Strategy identifies clear links with the Council’s corporate
objectives and its underlying values. It also picks up on a number of key
recommendations from the influential Byatt Report (“Delivering Better
Services for Citizens – A review of local government procurement in England”),
which was published jointly by the Government and the Local Government Association
in 2001.
Within the last two months the
Government and the LGA have published their formal joint response to the Byatt
Report entitled “Towards a National Strategy for Local Government
Procurement”. This in turn has led to the formation of a top level,
government-led National Procurement Forum for Local Government, the inaugural
meeting of which is due to take place during November 2002. It is expected to
consider a number of key issues for procurement in local government including
capacity, market intelligence, common conditions and training, etc. These
themes are certainly consistent with the aims of our own Procurement Strategy
and, in reality, it is likely to be some considerable while yet before any
genuinely tangible solutions emerge from the national forum.
CONSULTATION
6.
The
strategy has been considered by the Strategic Directors’ group and also
received input from a selected officer group. Additionally the District Audit team
have undertaken a short review of procurement within the Council recently and
roundly endorsed the content of the draft strategy as a framework for improving
procurement within the Authority.
FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPLICATIONS
7.
Specific
costs have not been identified at this stage. In practice, it is anticipated
that many of the actions are likely to be met from existing revenue budgets and
perhaps a reallocation or reprioritisation of certain existing resources, and
these will be reviewed as the strategy implementation progresses. Where more
fundamental change is envisaged (e.g. the development of an effective
e-procurement solution) then this will be subject to the development of a
specific business case in due course.
8.
Potentially
at least, improved procurement will lead to various value for money
improvements (both directly and indirectly), though clearly this remains
unquantified presently.
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS
9.
Whilst
procurement is subject to numerous legal requirements and influences (including
in the case of the public sector the EU Procurement Directives) there are no
direct legal implications arising from the Procurement Strategy itself.
OPTIONS
10.
It is considered the following options
exist:-
1.
Approve
the Procurement Strategy and accompanying action plan.
2.
Approve
the Procurement Strategy, but incorporate any suggestions for further
improvement arising from the Best Value Review.
3.
Reject
the Procurement Strategy and commission a formal thematic Best Value Review of
Procurement within the Authority.
4.
Note
the content and aims of the Procurement Strategy, but decide not to implement
it at this stage.
11.
The Procurement
Strategy as it stands is considered to provide the necessary focus to what
needs to be done to improve procurement within the Authority, and it provides a
suitable framework within which to engender such improvements within the medium
term.
12.
Arguably
the biggest potential risk to the ultimate success of the Procurement Strategy is that the Council fails to
adequately develop the capacity to support and deliver the potential benefits,
and under-resources what really needs to be done. This is likely to be an
evolutionary process.
13.
Delaying implementation for whatever reason
(e.g. awaiting possible developments from the National Procurement Forum) would
merely be a case of avoiding or putting off tackling many of the underlying
issues and in all probability would attract considerable criticism from any
follow-up CPA or District Audit inspection.
RECOMMENDATIONS 14. It is strongly
recommended that Option 2 above be adopted. |
BACKGROUND PAPERS
15.
Copies of the following publications are
available from the Purchasing Advice
Office:-
·
“Delivering Better Services for Citizens - A review of local government
procurement in England” (The Byatt Report)
·
“Towards a National Strategy for Local Government Procurement”
·
“Competitive Procurement” (published by
the Audit Commission 2002)
·
“Procurement in Local Government – The Isle of Wight Council” (Draft District Audit report –
October 2002)
Contact Point: John Spencer ((823276 or email: [email protected])
Bob Streets ((823622
or email: [email protected])
J PULSFORD Strategic Director for
Finance and Information and County Treasurer |
R R BARRY Portfolio Holder for
Resources |