PAPER B2


                                                                                                               Purpose : For Decision

Committee :    EXECUTIVE


Date :              18 JUNE 2002


Title :              BUILDING MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS


PORTFOLIO HOLDER FOR RESOURCES


paperb2.gif

 


SUMMARY/PURPOSE


The Council is at the end of a five year schedule of rates based term maintenance contract that delivers reactive property maintenance and repairs across the whole Council.


Following an extensive re-tendering process six companies were invited to submit tenders. The Executive is being invited to consider the award of building maintenance contracts. Details of the contractors are set out.


The term maintenance contracts are divided into eleven separate schedules based on service areas. Tenders, based on both price and quality were submitted in April.


The Council is now being recommended to accept the lowest tender in every case.


BACKGROUND


The schedule of rates based term contract for the delivery of reactive day to day maintenance in Council property has recently been re-tendered in accordance with Council Standing Orders.


The total value of work is estimated at ,650,000 per annum and is spread across 5,000 works orders. The length of contract has been deliberately set at three years to enable officers to explore future partnering arrangements whilst still maintaining an attractive package for prospective contractors.


The re-tendering process began in January 2002 with the advertising of invitations to tender, which appeared in the County Press and a National Building Magazine. In response, the Council received seven replies from interested contractors. One contractor subsequently withdrew their interest.


All applicants were required to complete a weighted quality assessment questionnaire from which inclusion on the final tender list would be decided. This ensured that contractors were selected for inclusion on the basis that they were capable of carrying out the work involved to a satisfactory standard. Following assessment, all six applicants achieved the minimum quality standard of 65% and were therefore invited to submit tenders.


Tender documents for each of the schedules listed in appendix A were sent to each contractor in February 2002. Tender returns were phased over a period of five weeks.

The method of tender analysis took account of both quality and price on principles agreed with the Internal Audit Manager as follows :


$     To determine the price, contractors were forwarded a copy of our priced maintenance schedule of rates containing ten trades and four reactive categories. On commercial principles, contractors calculated the amount they required to carry out the work and applied a plus or minus percentage figure to the prices contained in the schedule.


$     An average percentage figure was then calculated using the six trades and two categories mostly used.


$     To determine the successful contractor, a sum combination of quality (25%) and price (75%) is used.


$     The contractor with the lowest percentage figure was awarded 1,000 marks and the marks awarded to the remainder of the contractors decreased as their percentage figures rose.


$     The results of the successful contractors are listed in column B of Appendix A.


OUTCOME OF CONSULTATIONS


$     The Internal Audit Manager has approved the tender process.


$     Service Managers have been consulted on the outcome of tenders.


FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS


Tender process designed to achieve best value and quality for term maintenance contracts within existing revenue budgets.


LEGAL IMPLICATIONS


To document contracts.


RECOMMENDATIONS

 

That the Council agrees to award 3 year term maintenance contracts to the successful contractors listed in column B of the tender analysis form (Appendix A).

 

That Officers explore partnering opportunities for Future term maintenance contracts.

 

BACKGROUND PAPERS

 

 

 

Contact Point : Dick Sedgeley, F 823296

 

 

MIKE FISHER

Strategic Director, Corporate and Environment Services

 

REG BARRY

Portfolio Holder for Resources

 

 

 


                                                                                          DAY TO DAY MAINTENANCE (2002-2005)

                                                                                                            TENDER ANALYSIS

 

 

Contract

 

Column A

 

Column B

 

Approx

Annual

Contract

Value

£

 

Lowest Tender Price Only

 

Winning Tender Quality and Price

 

Contractor

 

+/-% of Schedule

Rates

 

Price

Score

Max 750

 

Quality

Score

Max

250

 

Overall

Scores

Quality

and

Price

Max

1000

 

Contractor

 

+/-% of Schedule

Rates

 

Price

Score

Max 750

 

Quality

Score

Max

250

 

Overall

Scores

Quality

and

Price

Max

1000

 

1

 

Primary Schools

 

 

 

(-) 30%

 

750

 

216

 

966

 

 

(-) 30%

 

750

 

216

 

966

 

142,000

 

2

 

Middle Schools

 

 

0%

 

750

 

236

 

986

 

 

0%

 

750

 

236

 

986

 

70,000

 

3

 

High Schools

 

 

 

0%

 

750

 

236

 

986

 

 

0%

 

750

 

236

 

986

 

94,000

 

4

 

Special Schools, etc

 

 

(-) 30%

 

750

 

216

 

966

 

 

(-) 30%

 

750

 

216

 

966

 

98,000

 

5

 

Administration Buildings,

Industrial Estates & Farms

 

 

5%

 

750

 

236

 

986

 

 

5%

 

750

 

236

 

986

 

53,000

 

6

 

Libraries, Museums & Roman Villa

 

 

7.50%

 

750

 

221

 

971

 

 

7.50%

 

750

 

221

 

971

 

23,000

 

7

 

Leisure Centres, Theatres, Cafes, Botanic Gardens & Changing Rooms

 

 

7.50%

 

750

 

221

 

971

 

 

7.50%

 

750

 

221

 

971

 

36,000

 

8

 

Public Conveniences & Cemeteries

 

 

7.50%

 

750

 

221

 

971

 

 

7.50%

 

750

 

221

 

971

 

53,000

 

9

 

Fire Stations

 

 

7.50%

 

750

 

221

 

971

 

 

7.50%

 

750

 

221

 

971

 

24,000

 

10

 

Old Peoples Homes & Day Centres

 

 

5%

 

750

 

236

 

986

 

 

5%

 

750

 

236

 

986

 

52,000

 

11

 

Tourist Information Centres, Fort Victoria & Newtown

 

 

7.50%

 

750

 

221

 

971

 

 

7.50%

 

750

 

221

 

971

 

Appendix A

5,000