-RISK TREATMENT ACTION PLAN |
|||||||
Risk No. |
Description |
Priority High/Medium/Low |
Financial Implications |
Action Taken |
Action Needed |
By Whom |
When By |
HIGH PRIORITY |
|||||||
S3 |
Risk
of Members not adhering to agreed Planning Policies |
High |
|
Development
Control Members have had some training |
Refresher
training – monitoring of member implementation and interpretation |
Andrew
Ashcroft |
June
2003 |
05 |
Adequacy
of Internal Audit Team |
High |
Bid
for £25k plus existing post made fulltime from existing budgets (£10k) |
Changes
to structure of the team – inc appointment of Chief Internal Auditor. Increase of 0.4fte plus bid for whole fte
in current budget round |
None
if bid successful |
JP/PW/RS |
March
03 |
O8 |
High
dependence on ICT systems/loss of server enclosure |
High |
|
See
09 |
See
09 |
Directors/JP/DP |
Linked
decision |
09 |
Lack
of ICT Continuity Planning |
High |
Public
Sector equivalent of bankruptcy |
Consultants
engaged on two/three year project to work with Council on Corporate Business
Continuity (Stage 1 Nov 02 to Feb 03) |
Priority
to either accept risk to server farm or fast track procurement of ‘box within
a box’ with a single preferred supplier Recognition
of organisation wide problem |
JP/DP
also Directors |
As
soon as it can be fitted into an affordable programme |
O10 |
Adequacy
and Efficiency of ICT function |
High
– link to 09 |
Significant |
Ten
year investment plan drafted |
Members/Directors/HOS
to understand egovt agenda/clear statement of requirements and prioities Proper
resourcing of ICT on long term basis Strategic
partnering geared around key priorities |
JP/DP |
ASAP As
appropriate |
011 |
Adequacy
of ICT Systems Security |
High |
Average
estimate per incident $108K (Computer Weekly 3/10/02) |
Substantial
practical efforts such as anti-virus, firewalls, monitoring |
Options; Live
with risk Appoint
extra staff to formal BS7799 accreditation |
JP/DP |
Review
February 03 |
012 |
Inadequate
Telephone Exchange enclosure |
High – link with 09 |
Not
known – significant corporate disruption |
Blinds
added to windows to reduce risk of vandalism |
Options: Live
with risk Move
to server farm if box in box project goes ahead Initiate
major project to review telephony across Council with aim to move to a
managed service |
JP/DP |
Link
to 09 |
O13 |
Lack
of Key Document Management Policy |
High |
|
Some
work on records to meet statutory requirements |
Appointment
of skilled information manager with support resources to drive agenda Investment
in relevant technologies |
MF/JL |
June
03 |
O14 |
Lack
of Project Delivery Skills – risk of Government Take-back |
High |
|
ICT
and Property Services have formal mngt methodologies ICT
have training supplier and have arranged for evaluation for end of October |
Decision
on Corporate approach Mandatory
requirement to use methodology properly Roll
out training programme Aim
for say 20 people formally accredited as PRINCE practitioners |
MF/DP |
June
03 |
O15 |
Adequacy
of Health and Safety Implementation |
High
– link to 016 |
|
Decision
made to take Health & Safety Advisory Service back in-house wef 1.4.03 |
Consideration
to be given to where day to day responsibility should lie. |
MF/MB |
1
April 2003 |
016 |
Inadequate
Corporate Health and Safety Policy Document |
High – link with 015 and H36 |
|
Identified
need for revised policy statement with effect from 1/11/02 |
Revised
document will be printed shortly and distributed |
MF/MB |
November
2002 |
O17 |
Lack of/inadequate succession planning in key Directorates |
High -Link with 019 |
|
|
|
|
|
019 |
Stress
related sickness/absence risks |
High |
|
Attendance
Stress policies issued April 2002. Review of policies undertaken.
|
Awareness
training for current and new managers
to be drawn up. Managers asked to
undertake a Stress Audit – results by end of Dec 02 |
MF/MB |
December
02 and review date to be set |
O20 |
Adequacy
of Personnel function |
High |
|
Best
Value review undertaken. Centrally based = economy of scale. Identified
greater investment in the strategic side of the business to ensure real added
value |
Consideration
of ‘Action Taken’ as part of Best Value review currently subject to external
challenge |
MF/MB |
April
03 |
O21 |
Risk
resulting from poor staff morale |
High
- link to 019 |
|
|
Staff
attitude survey required to establish baseline for moral/motivation. Introduction of HR/People Strategy with
clear guidelines and standards. |
MF/MB |
Both
by 1 April 2003 |
H32 |
Ineffective
Lone Worker Policy and mechanism |
High |
|
Identified
that policy not applied consistently |
Reminder
of H & S responsibilities to be sent out/cascaded down. Note to be made
that non-compliance is a disciplinary offence |
MF/MB |
|
H35 |
Inadequate
Security Procedures at principal IOWC buildings |
High |
|
Card
access system to many but not all principal buildings |
Upgrade
system and cover all buildings |
All
Directors |
|
H36 |
Cost
of Injury/Fatality to IOWC Staff |
High
– link to 016 |
|
|
H
& S Training |
MF/MB |
April
03 |
H38 |
Lack
of formal Business Continuity Planning for loss of principal IOWC Buildings |
High
– link with 08 and 09 |
Consultants
fee for project £56,000 (from Risk Bid Fund) Part
time post approx £10,000 pa |
Appointed
Marsh Risk Consulting to work with Authority over 21/2 year period |
Mike
Jolliff identified as co-ordinator.
Part time support post required to assist for time of project |
JP?RH/MJ |
Stage
1 Nov 02– Jan 03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MEDIUM PRIORITY |
|||||||
S1 |
Perceived
lack of clear Corporate Leadership |
Medium
|
|
|
|
|
Review
06/03 |
S2 |
Perceived
lack of meaningful Strategic Planning |
Medium |
|
|
|
|
|
S4 |
Lack
of direction and proactive action by Risk Management Group |
Medium |
|
Membership
reviewed in 2002/Risk Champion appointed. Risk Bid Funds available |
New
Risk Group membership wef Jan 03. New Risk Management Strategy and
Policy. Training of new Risk Group
then cascade through managers. RM
into Service Planning and onto Executive decision making. |
Directors/JP/CMS/JL |
Start
Jan 03 First
training to take place Feb – Apr 2003. Progress
through 2003 |
O6 |
Lack
of functional Audit Committee |
Medium |
None
but resource in terms of officer/member time |
Resources
Select Ctte has resolved to establish an audit panel and draft terms of ref
have been proposed. First meeting expected Dec 02 |
Monitor
to ensure carries out role DG
to discuss which DA reports to go forward to members |
JP/RS/AD Directors |
Dec
02 |
O7 |
Lack
of adequate Wight Bus Driver assessments/spot checks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
O23 |
Lack
of preventive maintenance in Leisure Centres |
|
|
|
|
|
|
O24 |
Industrial
Action risk by IOWC employees – risk of failure of Service Provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F25 |
Risk
of Internal Fraud within IOWC |
Change to Medium? |
Fraud
on the increase |
Slight
increase to Internal Audit resources |
Press
for increase as in 05 Audit
Ctte to ensure performance monitor role |
PW/RS |
April
03 |
F26 |
Inadequate
Highways maintenance budget |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F29 |
Loss
of Area Cost Adjustment |
Change to Medium |
Potentially
catastrophic |
Done
to date |
Further
action needed in the future |
JP |
|
F30 |
Adequacy
of Employee Pension Funds ongoing |
Medium |
Potential
higher contribution rates |
Fund
valued every 3 years |
Regular
review |
JP
and successor |
Done
but review annually? |
H37 |
Cost
of Injury/Fatality to Child in Care |
Query
change to Medium - Discuss |
|
|
|
|
|
H41 |
Risk
from a poor standard of IOWC Playgrounds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOW
PRIORITY |
|||||||
O18 |
Inadequate/Weak Contract Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
O22 |
Recruitment
and Retention risk for Retained Officers in Fire and Rescue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F27 |
Single
Pot Budget allocations in 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F28 |
High Pre-signed Cheque Counter-signature threshold |
Not
accepted as a risk on the basis of research with other authorities |
|
Need
to assess other measures which could be more effective than this control |
Research
into what other do |
PW/RS |
Jan
03 |
F31 |
Risk
of litigation against Fire and Rescue – failure to Duty of Care |
|
|
|
|
|
|
H33 |
Major
Coastal Erosion Risks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
H34 |
Lack
of Legionella assessment policy/testing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
H37 |
Cost
of Injury/Fatality to Child in Care |
Query
change to Medium - Discuss |
|
|
|
|
|
H39 |
Risk
from high dependency single site Crematorium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
H40 |
Cost
of injury/fatality to public resulting from inadequate seawall protection |
|
|
|
|
|
|