PAPER C

 

 

EDUCATION, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND LIFELONG LEARNING SELECT COMMITTEE - 17 FEBRUARY 2003

 

KEY STAGE 4 PERFORMANCE TABLES

 

STRATEGIC DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

 

 

 

Background

 

1.                  This is a report of Island performance in respect of the Key Stage 4 DfES Performance tables published on January 23 2003.

 

2.                  The tables contain information on the GCSE performance of Island High Schools together with information on unauthorised absence and for the first time a value-added measure of performance from Key Stage 2 to Key Stage 3 (Year 6 to Year 9) and Key Stage 3 to Key Stage 4 (Year 9 to Year 11).

 

3.                  The overall GCSE results are as reported at the December Select Committee. This report gives information on individual school performance in relation to GCSE results, value-added and attendance.

 

Value-added

 

4.                  This is the first year in which the DfES has published value-added data in respect of individual school and LEA performance. Two measures have been used to demonstrate the gain pupils have made from Year 6 to Year 9 and from Year 9 to Year 11. In 2004 one measure will be used to demonstrate the pupil gain from Year 6 to Year 11. The value-added measures apply to the individual cohort and represent the gains pupils have made from Year 6 to Year 11 regardless of their background and ability. The achievements of all pupils count in arriving at the score and the value-added measure can be, over time, a better indicator of a school's performance than the headline percentage statistic.

 

5.                  In the scoring system used this year a score of 99 to 105 indicates that pupils' achievement has been good, above 105 it has been very good. Between a score of 95 and 99 most pupils will have achieved what they should have done for their age and ability.

 

The Performance Tables

 

6.                  The tables presented on the next page give details of performance for each High school, the Authority and where comparators are available the national position.

7.                   

LEA Maintained Schools

 

 

Pupils aged 15

 

GCSE/GNVQ Results

 

Value-added

 

Attendance

 

 

 

 

Total

 

SEN

 

% SEN

 

5+ A*-C

 

5+ A*-G

 

No

passes

 

Av. Pt

Score

 

KS2-KS3

 

KS3- KS4

 

A

Abs.

 

UA

Abs.

 

LEA Average

 

 

 

 

 

45%

 

90%

 

5%

 

32.8

 

99.2

 

97.6

 

 

1.4%

 

 

England Average

 

 

 

 

 

51.5%

 

88.9%

 

5.4%

 

34.7

 

 

 

 

1.2%

 

Carisbrooke High School

 

 

306

 

37

 

12.1%

 

48%

 

91%

 

5%

 

33.1

 

100.3

 

97.8

 

9.1%

 

2.0%

 

Cowes High School

 

 

281

 

67

 

23.8%

 

43%

 

85%

 

 

6%

 

32.6

 

98.9

 

98.2

 

10.2%

 

0.8%

 

Medina High School

 

 

234

 

53

 

22.6%

 

38%

 

91%

 

3%

 

31.2

 

98.3

 

99.5

 

9.4%

 

1.3%

 

Ryde High School

 

 

274

 

71

 

25.9%

 

48%

 

89%

 

7%

 

32.9

 

98.0

 

98.4

 

7.5%

 

0.7%

 

Sandown High School

 

 

357

 

65

 

18.2%

 

47%

 

92%

 

5%

 

34.0

 

100.1

 

95.5

 

9.3%

 

1.8%

 

 

Note:   SEN - refers to the number and percentage of pupils in the examination year.

 

            A Abs - is the authorised absence in the 2001/02 year - U Abs - is the unauthorised absence in the 2001/02 year.


7.         Key points to note are:

 

·         45% of High school pupils gained 5+A*-C grades at GCSE or the GNVQ equivalent. This represents a small improvement upon 2001.

 

·         Girls continue to out-perform boys, particularly at the higher grades (A*-C) where the difference for the LEA is significantly higher than that nationally and in comparison to our statistical neighbours.

 

·         On the two key measures of 5+A*-C and average points score there is still significant improvement to be made locally.

 

·         In relation to the value-added scores it is clear that most pupils make the expected gains for their age and ability. Some individual school gains demonstrate good achievement.

 

·         Unauthorised absence is broadly in line with the national average; though authorised absence is still too high and has an adverse impact upon students' achievement.

 

Post 16 Performance

 

8.                  At this stage the DfES Performance indicators for Post 16 courses have not been published. This is as a result of the problems with A level awarding in the summer of 2002. Validated information, beyond that reported to members in December 2002 is not yet available. Final publication of the national data is now expected for April 2003.

 

 

Background Papers:

 

National Statistics DfES

Isle of Wight EDP

NCER Data Package

 

Contact point: Keith Simmonds - Senior Inspector - 823405

 

 

 

 

 


DAVID PETTITT

Strategic Director of Education and Community Development