APPENDIX 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – BRIEFING NOTE DIRECTOR’S GROUP
27.11.2003
REF: |
KEY
POINT – Briefing Note 27.11.2003: |
Page |
Para |
|
1 |
Revised Estimate 2003-04 |
Spending IN EXCESS of 2003-04
CASH LIMIT = £87,000. |
1 |
A |
2 |
School Budget 2004-05 |
£60,631,000 confirmed by DFES
19.11.2003. |
1 |
B |
Passporting NOT Negotiable. |
1 |
B |
||
3 |
School Delegated Budgets ISB 2004-05 |
Increase in ISB EQUAL TO
increase in SFSS = 4.739% OR £2,301,781 |
1 |
B1 |
Sufficient resources available
to ‘Deliver’ the Minimum per Pupil guarantee with £242,236 HEADROOM remaining |
1 |
B1 |
||
Sufficient resources available
to ‘Deliver’ a Standstill Budget for Schools with £416,219 HEADROOM
remaining. |
2 |
B1 |
||
Informed debate pending with
School Forum on the interaction of standstill components. |
2 |
B1 |
||
IR revaluation of
property valuations has resulted in an increased payment for property rates
£80,832 to be met from SFSS increase if no Cash Limit adjustment available. |
2 |
B1 |
||
4 |
‘Central Services’ within the Schools Budget |
Total available = £9,757,913 an
increase of £374,512 or 3.99% |
2 |
B2 |
Excess of Planned
spending over sum available = £304,988 |
2 &
3 |
B2 |
||
Additional costs NOT included in
£437,888 excess include Early years third term Universal Provision and NEW
CASES for Low Incidence SEN statements. |
3 |
B2 |
||
5 |
Controls over the rate of Increase for central services
within the Schools Budget |
NOTE new requirements and the
FUNDING .v. CAPPING conflict. |
3 |
B3 |
Extension to 13th
February for LEAs seeking permission for spending at a greater rate than ISB
uplift where Passporting in FULL. |
3 |
B3 |
||
DFES ‘Test’ document available
that will ‘cap’ the amount of spending available. Flaw in the proposed methodology identified. Awaiting
confirmation. |
3 |
B3 |
||
6 |
The ‘impoverished’ LEA Block |
Total available = £8,023,000 an
increase of £162,539 or 2.07% |
4 |
B4 |
Excess of Planned
spending over sum available = £362,861 |
4 |
B4 |
||
7 |
School Standards Fund |
INCOMPLETE – will have a bearing
on minimum spend Central Services within the Schools Budget |
4 &
5 |
B5 |
8 |
NEW COSTS – Work Force Remodelling and Upper Pay Scale 2
& 3. |
WHO PAYS? – SCHOOLS WILL BE
VOCAL ON THIS. |
5 |
B6 |
9 |
Transitional Funding to Support Schools in Financial
Difficulty. |
Prior calls on any headroom
identified in 3 above – WILL NOT PROVE POPULAR. |
5 |
B7 |
10 |
LSC Funding |
4% uplift ASSUMED in ALL
Expenditure Tests. If different only
significant for High schools where the LEA will pass on exactly what it
receives. |
Not included as part of the
Briefing paper or report to Schools Forum. |
AK 25.11.2003