PAPER C
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING, TOURISM AND LEISURE SERVICES SELECT COMMITTEE – 28 JULY 2003 QUARTERLY
REPORT ON ISLE OF WIGHT ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP ACTIVITIES REPORT OF THE
HEAD OF CORPORATE POLICY AND COMMUNICATIONS |
To
update Members on the activities of IWEP
Members
note this report.
BACKGROUND
Members may wish to note, in
particular, the good progress being made on Project Cowes and the work on
developing the Area Investment framework (AIF) to which Council departments are
being encouraged to contribute with project proposals.
RELEVANT
PLANS, POLICIES, STRATEGIES AND PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
The
work undertaken by IWEP contributes to the following:
·
Economic Development Best Value Improvement Plan
·
Economic Development PSA Targets.
N/A
FINANCIAL
IMPLICATIONS
For
the financial year 2003 / 2004 the Council have contributed £104,000 in cash
and second staff as agreed. In addition
the Council continue to honour their agreement to pay the rent on Enterprise
House should IWEP be unable to do so.
This amounts to £135,000 per year paid in quarterly instalments of
£33,750 in arrears.
LEGAL
IMPLICATIONS
This report sets out
information about various activities of the IWEP, to which the Council is
entitled under the service level agreement. The Executive, through the Head of
Corporate Policy, is responsible for contract monitoring and the invitation to
note the information does not raise any legal issues
Appendix 1 Summary of IWEP activities
Appendix 2 Minutes of the Regeneration Sub-Committee
for 3 July 2003.
1
Service Level Agreement between the Council and IWEP
2
Legal Agreements between the Council and IWEP
undertaking to guarantee payment of the rent on the properties known as
Enterprise House and the Innovation Centre, St Cross Business Park, Newport,
should the IWEP be unable to do so.
Contact
Point : , F John Bentley
Head of
Corporate Policy and Communications
Ext 3346
APPENDIX 1
IWEP
Activities – Quarterly Report
Summary
The regeneration programmes
are currently delivering to projected profiles for the year 2003-04. Several grant programmes will cease in March
2004 and work is in progress to access monies from the single pot [SEEDA] and
from other funders, for future regeneration activity through the Area
Investment Framework process.
Project Cowes is almost at
the conclusion of phase 1 [land acquisition] and will start to move into the
next phase. The Innovation Centre is
functioning successfully as part of the Enterprise Hub Initiative and the
Virtual Hub project is gradually gaining momentum.
Other programmes are on
schedule to achieve the targets for 2003-04 as described under the sections
itemised below.
Regeneration Programmes
Quarterly returns containing
key indicators, outputs and outcomes are due to be completed and sent to SEEDA
at the end of July for the Quarter 1 period [April-June] 2003-04.
SRB Programmes V and VI
The SRBV programme is due to
be completed in March 2004 and is now fully committed.
There was an underspend in
SRBVI at the end of 2002-03 due to the development of the Public Realm Strategy. This meant that infrastructure projects
could not be taken forward as had originally been planned. This was at the request of SEEDA and
therefore the underspend did not result in loss of grant funding and the monies
have been carried over into this year 2003-04.
The Public Realm Strategy is
in the final draft stage and should be finalised in Quarter 2
[July-September]. The IWEP is looking
to work with the IW Council to appoint a co-ordinator for the development of
the sea front area including supporting the development of the Interchange
project.
The Ryde Development Trust
held their AGM in June and there are now 7 Trustees and there will be a Council
Member nominated by the IW Council.
They are looking to appoint 2 further trustees and have a second
nomination from the IW Council.
Rural Development Programme
This programme will cease in
March 2004 and this year’s money is already fully committed. Officers are
looking to theme projects that are coming forward for funding under the Area
Investment Framework proposals to access money from funders for 2004 onwards.
Leader+
There are more projects
coming forward under this initiative and 7 were approved by the LAG group over
the last three months.
These include:
Title |
Grant |
Match Funding |
Timescale |
Apple Day |
£16,245 |
£18,185 |
3 years |
Brading IT |
£32,260 |
£55,011 |
5 years |
Chale Nursery |
£50,727 |
£30,959 |
3 years |
Green Life |
£19,951 |
£4,988 |
1 year |
Sustainable Tourism |
£59,873 |
£54,847 |
3 years |
West Wight Sports Centre |
£2,025 |
£2500 |
1 year |
Wight Community Transport |
£23,430 |
£101,478 |
2 years |
Market Towns Initiative
The delivery plans for
Sandown and Shanklin have been approved by SEEDA and a town co-ordinator is
working with the two towns to support delivery of the programmes.
The Ventnor delivery plan is
still waiting approval and there is a recruitment process in place for the
appointment of a town co-ordinator.
There is a need to ensure that the MTI is seen as part of a strategy for
the whole of the area and is not delivered in isolation. Recruitment of a new MTI co-ordinator is
also in place as the previous co-ordinator has relocated to the mainland.
Healthy Living Programme
The 19 projects are
currently being reviewed with project leaders to look at forward strategies
beyond December 2003. There are still
some issues about how to make this programme sustainable and this is being
addressed through the advisory group and the management group. The issues will be raised with NOF who are
the current funders of the programme.
Enterprise & Investment
Project Cowes:
We have now completed our
second round of public consultation with an overall approval rating in excess
of 80%. This is a clear indication of the importance of this Project to the
overall development of the IoW economy.
In conjunction with SEEDA,
we will be hosting a number of guests during Cowes Week. This will include a
mix of potential investors, developers, press and potential occupiers, all of
whom have shown interest in investing in the Medina Valley.
The Project will soon move
on from the current land acquisition phase to concentrate on 4 themes. These
are; Business, Infrastructure, Communities and Environment.
We anticipate the Project
will last from 5-10 years and will become a key driver in providing a step
change in our economic fortunes.
Inward Investment:
We are continually working
on a number of inward investment projects. These projects, by their very nature
take many months to come to fruition and therefore, there will be little change
from quarter to quarter.
Current active projects
include; a 12 man call centre, 5 marine operators, a medical supplies company
and 2 bio-diesel companies.
We are in contact with many
other potential investors under the auspices of Project Cowes, in the main
these tend to be in the leisure sector.
Innovation Centre:
We are part of the successful
SEEDA Enterprise Hub initiative, whereby up to 30 business incubators are
established across the south east. Aimed at high tech. high growth companies,
the Centre now houses 8 direct tenants and 2 ‘virtual’ tenants, 2 companies
having combined and graduated out of the Centre to their own premises in
Newport, (this is exactly what the Centre is here for). The Centre aims to
remove barriers to growth which can include access to finance, marketing etc as
well as providing top quality business premises. In the 2 year history of the
Centre we have had 3 graduations, (the highest in the SE network), 1 business
failure and contact with approximately 50 companies.
The next 6 months will see
the development of our ‘Hatchery’ where we will provide facilities on a ‘rent a
desk’ basis, including access to Broadband.
Ambassadors Scheme:
As previously reported, this
scheme now operates with a much lower profile than that previously run by IoW
Tourism. However the scheme is far more effective in attracting new investment
to the Island. 4 of our current inward investment opportunities have come from
people acting as an Ambassador for the Island.
The scheme will now be
formalised with names being put forward. We will then supply a simple piece of
promotional material and an area on our web-site (currently under development)
to all Ambassadors. We will have 3 main areas of operation, Individual
Ambassadors, Corporate Ambassadors and Media Ambassadors. The media element is
a development of the already successful PR Network we have established.
Ambassadors will simply be
asked to promote the Isle of Wight and provide us with contact details for
those interested in investing in our future.
We anticipate putting
together a business plan during the next quarter, on how the scheme can operate
in the future; this will include an Ambassadors Club to promote the Island at a
higher level.
PSA Targets
Target 3 – Job Creation
Inward Investment activities
have been summed up under the section Enterprise & Investment and the
actual returns are in line with the projected targets to be delivered by March
2003.
Target 11 – Over 50’s Employment
It was anticipated that
there would be a development phase to this target area prior to the achievement
of any target figures. There is now an
agreement between JobCentre Plus and the IWEP about the types of activities
that will take place and there is a proposal being developed to work with
B&Q to help develop confidence and skills with the 50+ unemployed
group. There is also a proposal to
access a special pot of funding that has been allocated to innovative projects
that provide training and resource to enable older people to access work.
Financial Report
The financial forecasts made
by the IWEP for the first quarter of the financial year are on target and the
figures have been shared with the finance department of the IW Council.
Other Activities
Area Investment Framework (AIF)
The AIF is the key to future
grant funding activities (A copy of the AIF has been sent to all members of the
Select Committee and a copy is available in the Members room). The Isle of Wight as a sub-region is well
ahead in the development of its AIF and an action plan to implement it. There is an expectation from major funders
that we will have a proposal by the end of 2003 which sets out some major
schemes and activities to achieve the priorities set out in the AIF
document. Meetings have been held with
the executive to the Local Strategic Partnership to ensure that the members of
the Partnership are fully involved in the process. Workshops are being planned with the various theme groups to
ensure that there is as much involvement as possible with all stakeholders in
designing the schemes and activities that will be put forward.
AIF
Overview of Investment Priorities and Forward Strategy
APPENDIX 2
MINUTES
FOR THE REGENERATION SUB-GROUP MEETING HELD ON THURSDAY 3 JULY 2003
IN
THE BOARDROOM, INNOVATION CENTRE, ST CROSS BUSINESS PARK NEWPORT COMMENCING AT
1PM
Present: David Crawley : David Guy : Glen Garrod
Roger Staker : Michael
White : Liz Wood
In Attendance: Robert Snow
1. Apologies: Cllr
Harry Rees : Ruth Realey : Pam Stamps
In the absence of Cllr Rees, David Guy agreed to chair
the meeting.
2. Minutes of the previous meeting agreed as a true record and
duly signed.
Matters
Arising – NONE
3.
Declarations of
Interest:
a.
Agenda Item 4b – David Crawley declared an interest in that he is known
personally to persons involved in the project.
4.
Projects for
Approval
a. Verbum dei Centre
Liz Wood explained the
background to this application and also gave details of previous successful
funding applications from this group.
She further explained that at present we are not in a position to commit
any new projects to the RDP.
A discussion followed from
which the following points were highlighted:
-
That the sub-group had concerns that this project had already had
successful bids from the RDP and felt that as we are meant to be ‘grant of last
resort’ it may be better if they explored other areas for funding.
-
It was felt that this project would probably go ahead with or without
RDP funding albeit to a slightly revised timescale.
It was therefore proposed that this application be
refused.
Proposed : Roger
Staker
Seconded : David
Crawley
Carried Unanimously
APPLICATION
REJECTED
b. Ventnor Eastern Esplanade
Liz Wood gave a brief overview
of the reasons behind this application and explained that although funding may
not be available through RDP there was a need to look at ways to help this
project forward. It may be possible to
do this through the MTI route.
After further discussion the
following actions were agreed:
·
A meeting will be arranged with an Economic Partnership Development
Officer, Ventnor Town Council members and the MTI Development Officer to take a
fresh look at the way Ventnor could benefit.
·
That this application be deferred until further information is
available.
APPLICATION
DEFERRED
c. Island Enterprise
Liz Wood explained some of
the background to this application and also commented that there were still a
number of issues and unanswered questions associated with this project.
It was agreed after
discussion that this project be refused.
Proposed: Michael White
Seconded: David Crawley
Carried unanimously.
APPLICATION
REJECTED
David Guy then made the
point that although the sub-group had been informed that there was no further
funding available in RDP, it might be prudent to have one or two projects ready
to be submitted at short notice should this situation change.
5.
Update on
Programmes
Liz Wood gave an update on
the following programmes:
Healthy Living:
·
There are 19 projects in total.
·
The programme has experienced some difficulties but is now moving
forward.
·
Management and Advisory Groups are now operating.
·
Funding ceases at the end of 2003.
There is a need to start looking now for extra funding to sustain the
projects in their final year.
·
Efforts are being made to see if the programme can be incorporated into
the ‘single pot’ bidding round.
·
The next Management Group meeting will have a representative from NOF
attending.
The following comments were
then made:
·
David Crawley was concerned that there was a lack of ‘team
playing’. Liz explained that this had
been the case but she felt that things had now improved.
·
Roger Staker felt that the project leaders should be involved in
sourcing further funding.
·
Glen Garrod felt that the Advisory Group was not very ‘robust’ and that
there appeared to be a lack of an evaluation strategy. He also felt that unless the programme
becomes part of ‘mainstream’ funding that other funding will not be available.
It was agreed that the next
6 months should be used to implement a ‘rescue package’ to help retain the
credibility of the Island. It was also
agreed that a small group should be formed in order to take this forward. A date will be arranged to bring this group
together and that this information should be forwarded to the Advisory Group.
ACTION Liz Wood
Market Towns Initiative
·
Delivery Plans for Sandown and Shanklin have been approved.
·
Delivery Plan for Ventnor is in the process of being approved.
·
Ventnor are looking to re-appoint a project manager. Liz explained the reason why this was
necessary.
·
Sandown and Shanklin project manager has had a few accommodation
problems and there are other issues relating to this project that need to be
resolved.
·
MTI Co-ordinator has resigned due to relocation to the mainland. With 18 months of the programme still to run
it is envisaged that a new appointment will be made but with a slightly amended
remit.
Rural Development Programme
·
This programme is due to end in March 2004.
·
RDP is already oversubscribed and the Regeneration Director and team
will be looking at ways of relocating some projects into other areas.
SRBV
·
Funding ends march 2004.
·
£1.5 million over 5 years has been fully committed.
At this point Liz Wood drew
the attention of the sub-group to a project known as COMMENT, funded within
this programme. She explained that there had been problems with a switch in
emphasis of the outputs. Funding for
the training element of this project was withdrawn last financial year
[2002/03] as a result of a failure of the project to attain accreditation for
the training. There were still difficulties with the delivery of the project. The project leader was informed that further
funding would not be available. As a
result the project leader wrote direct to SEEDA expressing her disagreement
with this decision.
SEEDA asked that this matter
be brought to the attention of the sub-group for their comments.
ACTION Liz Wood
After discussion it was agreed that a written report should be produced
for sub-group members detailing all the events and that a decision will be made
after members have studied this report.
SRBVI
Liz Wood explained the
background reasons for the underspend in this programme during the previous
financial year. She also updated the
sub-group members of the following:
·
The Public Realm Strategy is now almost reaching the final draft stage.
·
Most RDT Board issues have now been resolved.
·
Brian Friend from the IWEP Board will be put forward as an independent
chair for the RDT Board.
·
ACTION Liz Wood
It was felt that there is a lack of co-ordination in what is happening
on Ryde seafront. It was therefore proposed that a Project Director should be
employed to oversee all areas of future activity and to bring together all the
agencies involved in making things happened coherently in Ryde. This will be done in co-operation with the
new Council Environmental Services Director and will be funded from SRBVI. SEEDA are in agreement with this
proposal.
At this point Liz Wood drew
members’ attention to the project known as Heart of Pan. She highlighted some of the problems
associated with the project including:
·
The funding should have come from the 2002-03 spend.
·
The project leader had re-located to the mainland.
·
A requested de-briefing meeting, prior to the project leader leaving,
did not happen.
·
A letter was sent to IWC and a meeting then followed with officers of
the IWC. The RCC have also met with IWC
officers.
·
There is still no clarity and accurate figures for the proposed capital
works.
As a result of these
meetings the following information was forthcoming:
·
There is still no overall project plan.
·
A large percentage of the money committed to the project has been used
to employ a consultant.
·
No further commitment has been decided as to who will lead this
project.
·
An earlier request for a team to be formed to help the project leader
has not been implemented.
·
There is an issue as to where the funding for Pan will now be sourced.
·
The proposed capacity building with the community has not taken place.
In conclusion it was agreed
that all these issues should be brought to the attention of the new
Environmental Services Director.
Concern was expressed that there was no ‘holistic’ approach to the
project as submitted originally to the sub-group. There was no commitment from the Housing Association and
therefore there was no ‘partnership’ approach.
The group felt that there needed to be work done with the community
prior to any further consideration of the project.
6.
IWEP Business
Plan
Liz Wood reported that the
IWEP Business Plan for 2002-2004 had been approved by the board of IWEP. Copies had been emailed to sub-group members
prior to this meeting.
David Guy asked if there had
been any alterations to the remit of the Regeneration sub-Group. The answer was no.
7. Local Strategic Partnership & delivery of Area
Investment Framework
Liz Wood reported to members
on the following points:
·
That there had been a meeting of the LSP and it had been highlighted
that there is a need to take this forward and build on the impetus already
achieved.
·
All future funding will be accessed through the AIF.
·
At present the group has admin support through the IWC but no ‘driver’
At this point Roger Staker
left the meeting:
·
Liz then went onto explain that it was possible to commit SRBVI monies
to take the AIF forward and suggested that Roger Staker could be the person to
do this. He would be employed by the IWEP and tasked with achieving all the
aims set out in the AIF. Liz then asked
the sub-group members for their approval and support for this action.
After a short discussion it
was agreed that this was an excellent way forward. Michael White proposed that the contracting be agreed by Mrs Wood
and the appointment made. This was
unanimously agreed.
Roger Staker then rejoined
the meeting.
8. Membership and Remit
of the Sub-Group
It was agreed that the new Environmental
Services Director should be approached with a view to him joining the
sub-group.
ACTION Liz Wood
It was confirmed that the
new Chief Executive of the RCC will also sit on the sub-group.
9. Any Other Business - NONE
10. Date of next meeting: Thursday
14 August 2003