MINUTES
OF A MEETING OF THE LICENSING SUB COMMITTEE HELD IN COMMITTEE ROOM 1, COUNTY
HALL, NEWPORT, ISLE OF WIGHT, ON 13 FEBRUARY 2006 COMMENCING AT 9.50 AM
Present :
Cllrs Ivan Bulwer, George Cameron, David Whittaker
98. ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN
RESOLVED :
THAT Mr I Bulwer be elected Chairman for the day.
99. MINUTES
RESOLVED :
THAT the minutes of the meetings held on 10 January and 23 January 2006, be confirmed.
100. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
There were no declarations of interest made at this stage.
101. URGENT BUSINESS
There were no urgent items of business for consideration.
102.
REPORT OF THE HEAD OF CONSUMER PROTECTION
Consideration was given
to Paper B, the report of the Head of Consumer Protection, providing details of an Application for a Premises
Licence, received, in accordance with Section 17 of the Licensing Act 2003.
Details of the proposed steps to be taken by the
applicant to promote the licensing objectives were set out in the report of the
Head of Consumer Protection, circulated with the agenda.
The Sub Committee followed the agreed procedure,
which had been previously circulated to all parties prior to the meeting. After the hearing of the application the Sub
Committee presented the following decision and the reasons for that decision.
RESOLVED:
THAT upon receiving the report of the
Licensing section, written and/or oral evidence from the applicant, the police
and having regard to the Guidance issued under s182 of the Licensing Act 2003
and the Isle of Wight Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy 2004 – 2007, the
application be determined as detailed below:
Decision Ref |
102 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Application: |
Application for a
Premises Licence for Club K, Bowling Green Lane, Newport, Isle of Wight |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Details: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Public Participants: |
Mr
P Savill (Legal representative of the
Hampshire Constabulary) Sgt
Mudge (Hampshire Constabulary) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional Representations: |
None |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments : |
A letter dated
10 February 2006 from Jeffrey Green Russell, solicitors, was tabled which
indicated that the applicant would not be in attendance and requested that
the application be determined on the papers submitted. Prior to consideration
of the report Members of the Sub Committee confirmed that they had read all
the papers contained within Paper B. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reasons for Decision: |
The
Sub Committee noted that the applicant had chosen not to attend the hearing but
gave no weight to this in their deliberations. All members of the Sub Committee had read the papers submitted
by the applicant and felt he would not be disadvantaged by his
non-attendance. The
Sub Committee also noted that there was a legal argument over whether a valid
premises licence was in force. They
felt that this hearing was not the correct forum to address any such
argument. Nor could any adverse
inferences be drawn about the premises having traded on several occasions
during the period, in terms of today’s application. The
Sub Committee accepted the detailed written and oral evidence from the police
in relation to crime and disorder relating to the premises. All four licensing objectives were
affected by this application but it was the objectives of the Prevention of
Crime and Disorder and the Protection of Children from Harm that was most
relevant. There
had been a long history of crime and disorder problems in and around the
premises and this had extended to involve children. It was noted that in 2005 the applicant, Mr Blacklock, was
fined for supplying alcohol to a person under age. The
Sub Committee also accepted the police evidence that their efforts to work in
co-operation with the management had been largely ignored and the same difficulties
had continued. The Sub Committee felt
that there were no conditions that could realistically hope to remedy the
failures in the Club’s management. It
was recognised that an outright refusal was a severe step but considered it
to be justified in the circumstances, not withstanding the effect it would
have on the owners business. The
Sub Committee had regard to the Human Rights Act 1998, and in particular
Article 1 of the First Protocol, Article 8 and Article 6. The Sub Committee considered their decision
to be proportionate and necessary for the promotion of the four licensing
objectives under the Licensing Act 2003. The
Sub Committee advised the applicant that they had a right of appeal to the
Magistrates Court if they were dissatisfied with the decision, and that any
such appeal had to be made within 21 days. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Resolution: |
THAT the grant
of a Premises Licence for the Club K, Bowling Green Lane, Newport be refused,
as that decision was considered to be necessary to promote the four Licensing
Objectives. |
CHAIRMAN