PAPER C
Reference Number: P/00676/06 - TCP/23641/C Parish/Name:
Newport - Ward/Name: Newport North Registration Date:
29/03/2006 - Full Planning Permission Officer: Miss S
Wilkinson Tel: (01983) 823552 Applicant: CHG
Holdings Ltd Demolition of existing building and development of a 3 and 4 storey
(66 bedrooms) hotel 41, Lugley Street, Newport, PO30 The application is recommended for Conditional Permission |
REASON FOR COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION
This is a major application of Island wide significance.
1. Details
of Application
1.1 The application seeks consent for the
demolition of existing building and development of a three and four storey, 64
bedroomed hotel. This scheme has been
revised (external design only) since the last Committee Meeting.
1.2 The proposed development is a no parking
scheme due to the town centre location and close proximity of transport
networks. Additionally, well as the proposal is for a ‘Travel Lodge’ style
hotel it has been proposed to make use of the car park almost opposite the site
within Lugley Street.
1.3 The site comprises a total of 64
bedrooms comprising 39 family bedrooms, 3 double, 18 shower and 4 accessible
rooms as well as providing a small bar servery and buffet area on ground floor.
1.4 The proposal has been submitted
following a refusal of a previous scheme. A number of discussions have been
undertaken in order to achieve the current scheme now providing a development
of comparative height to neighbouring properties with a central projecting feature
providing accommodation in the roof space as is characteristic of conservation
areas.
1.5 The proposal makes effective use of
available space by providing a ‘U’ shaped building with enclosed courtyard
landscaping area to the rear.
1.6 Since
the Committee Meeting of 6 June 2006, the applicant has amended the proposed
external materials and included double hung sliding sash windows. A streetscene
has also been submitted in order to place the proposed design in context of
adjoining proposed development.
2. Location and Site Characteristics
2.1 The site is approximately 0.0932
hectares located on the south side of Lugley Street where it joins Mill Street
and is the site of the former cinema.
2.2 The building currently on site is a two
storey flat roofed derelict building which occupies the entire area of the site
and makes no contribution to the conservation area within which it is located.
2.3 The area is of mixed appearance with a
combination of terraced properties, the detached Lugley House, Lugley Street
car park and the rear of the Post Office. To the east of the site there are a
number of restaurants and residential properties with the west moving
predominantly to residential as Lugley Street turns into Hearn Street. A number
of listed buildings surround the site fronting both Lugley Street and High
Street.
2.4 The streetscene is however characterised
by 2/3 storey buildings of early 19th century cottages and late
Victorian terraced style, of mainly brick construction with slate roofs.
3. Relevant History
3.1 P/01014/00 – TCP/23641 – an application
for alterations to shop front (High Street elevation) alterations to rear
elevation (fronting Lugley Street) single storey extension to link the shop to
warehouse; change of use of warehouse to retail was refused in May 2001 on the
grounds of design and proposed materials having a detrimental impact on the
character and amenities of the conservation area.
3.2 P/02112/05 – TCP/23641/B – an
application for the demolition of the existing building and development of a
three and four storey (70 bedroomed) hotel was refused in January 2006 for
reasons of over development and detrimental impact on the surrounding listed
buildings.
4. Development Plan Policy
4.1 National Policy Guidance
·
PPS6 – Planning & Town Centres
·
PPG13 – Transport is applicable
·
PPG15 – Planning and the Historic Environment relates directly to the
demolition and replacement of building within the conservation area.
4.2 The following Strategic Policies within
the Unitary Development Plan are applicable:
·
S1 - New development will be concentrated within existing urban areas
·
S2 - Development will be
encouraged on land which has previously been developed
·
S3 – All development will be expected to be of a high standard of design
·
S3 – New development of a large scale will be expected to be located in
or adjacent to defined envelopes
·
S11 – Reducing reliance on the private car
4.3 The
following Development Plan Policies are applicable:
·
G1 - Development Envelopes
·
G4 - General Locational Criteria
·
D1 - Standards of Design
·
D2 - Standards for Development within the Site
·
D3 – Landscaping
·
D11 – Crime and Design
·
B2 - Settings of Listed Buildings
·
B6 - Protection and Enhancement of Conservation Areas
·
B7 – Demolition of non-listed buildings
·
T1 - The Promotion of Tourism and the Extension of the Season
·
T3 – Criteria for the development of hotel accommodation
·
P1 – Pollution and Development
·
TR3 – Locating development to minimise the need to Travel
·
TR4 – Transport Statement requirements for major developments
·
TR6 – Cycling and Walking
·
TR7 - Highway Considerations for New Development
·
TR16 - Parking Policies and Guidelines
·
U11 - Infrastructure and Services Provision
5. Consultee and Third Party Comments
5.1 Internal Consultees
·
Conservation and Design Team have been instrumental in the negotiations
undertaken to come to the revised scheme in front of Members and request
conditions be placed on the application if approved to do with detailing,
colours and finishes.
·
Head of Tourism Services fully supports the application stating that it
is entirely consistent with the findings of the Tourism Development Plan –
Working for a Smarter, Sustainable Future completed in January 2006.
·
The Council’s Crime Prevention and Design Advisor has no objections to
the planning application.
5.2 Others
·
One letter of objection has been received objecting on grounds of the
development being out of character with the area, a burden on the drainage
system, noise and disturbance to the residents of neighbouring properties and
the access road not being designed for high level of traffic.
6. Evaluation
6.1 The determining factors in considering
this proposal are considered to be as follows:
·
Suitability of the use in this location
·
Impact on the character of the area
·
Impact of the development on residential premises
·
Suitability of access road
·
Drainage
·
Suitability of the use in this location
6.2 The use as a hotel is appropriate in a
town centre location. As such the principle of this proposal fully complies
with the requirements of national guidance outlined in PPS6 – Planning and Town
Centres. PPS6 identifies town centres as the most accessible location for
refusal, leisure, office and tourism uses, including hotels.
6.3 Impact
on the character of the area
The proposed development
is located within the Conservation Area and extensive discussions took place
between the applicant/agent and the Conservation and Design Team to produce a
proposal that would receive their support. The massing of the building has been
significantly reduced from the scheme originally submitted and refused at the
beginning of this year. A whole storey has been removed from the element on the
corner of Mill Street with the four storey element now being provided within
the roof space with the provision of dormer windows, as well as a gable element
that provides a design feature over at the entrance to the building. The corner
element is now of a comparative height to the building recently constructed on
the opposite side of Mill Street. The decrease in height of this element has in
turn reduced the impact on the surrounding listed buildings, as the proposal
would not protrude significantly above the height of the listed Castle Inn,
which fronts High Street.
6.4 The four
storey element of the proposal is at the centre of the scheme both being in
keeping with the changing heights of buildings that characterises Conservation
Areas and now being opposite a break in the street scene so as not to dominant
or shadow any three storey building on the opposite side of Lugley Street.
6.5 The window
proportions of the development have been altered to be more in keeping with the
building proportions and the character of the surrounding area, with vertical
emphasis.
6.6 The building
has been designed as a number of separate appearing elements with breaks in the
roof and building line in order to retain the character of Newport, which is
generally, terrace style buildings with vertical emphasis rather than large
blocks. The proposal respects the character of the area and makes good use of
an existing under utilized Brownfield site.
6.7 Additional discussions
have been undertaken with the architect following concerns raised by Committee
in respect of building materials. As such the west wing of the building has been
finished in red brick with the projecting gable feature of the same material.
Due to problems with the construction of the side elevation the central feature
has been retained in render with the eastern wing also remaining render in
order to retain the design characteristic of the projecting gable. It is
considered by Officers that due to a number of painted brick buildings within
Lugley Street, this reduced element of render is acceptable and the development
would sit comfortably within the streetscene, with the use of through coloured
render reducing the need for maintenance below that of painted brick. It is
considered that the proposal sits comfortably within the varied design of
Lugley Street as well as forming a new streetscene where there is currently a
number of derelict buildings of painted brick.
6.8 In line with requests from Members, the
windows have been altered to be of double hung sliding sash style to better tie
the development with existing properties within Lugley Street.
6.9 Impact
of the development on residential premises
The building has a
residential property opposite the Mill Street elevation however due to the
intercepting road and the proximities involved not being uncharacteristic of
many roads in Newport there is not considered to be an overlooking issue in
this instance. The other neighbouring property is separated from the site by an
access to the rear of the building known as Red House Spa that fronts High
Street. Additionally the building is subject of an application for the
redevelopment of the rear of Post Office. On investigation of the plans, there
would appear to be no overlooking created that would cause concern in respect
of impacting on the redevelopment of the neighbouring site for residential
purposes. The rear service yard will be overlooked but due to the use with any
overlooking being from bedrooms that would not be occupied during the day, this
is not considered to be of significant impact.
6.10 Concern has been raised by an objector, on
the grounds of disturbance and noise from the use to nearby residential
premises. It is not considered that a hotel use would create any additional
disturbance than residential flats, which would be an alternative use in this
location. The site is located within the town centre of Newport; it is not
considered that any disturbance from this use would be above that already
experienced in this location.
6.11 Suitability
of the road
Lugley Street is one of
the main through roads in Newport and is one way with parking only on one side
with continuous footway. These factors make it safe for pedestrians and control
the speed of traffic. The development is a no parking scheme with overnighters
being encouraged to use one of the two car parks along Lugley Street. The road
is of adequate width and construction to take any additional traffic created by
the development. Additionally the proposal has been submitted with a travel
plan that sees other forms of transport to access the site, which are possible
due to its town centre location.
6.12 The Traffic Transportation Manager has
confirmed the suitability and capacity of Lugley Street Car Park for the guest
parking and has requested that, due to the increased usage in hours of
darkness, suitable lighting and security in the form of CCTV is provided. This
has been conditioned accordingly.
6.13 A request was made that improved pedestrian
flows could be considered. Following another site visit, two dropped kerbs have
been identified from the car park to the opposing side of the road and almost
directly outside the site itself. The positioning of a zebra crossing has been
investigated however, this would involve the removal of on-road parking within
Lugley Street which is considered to slow vehicle traffic and be of greater
benefit. It is not considered that the proposed development would create hazards
to pedestrian movements and therefore no changes are recommended at this time
but this will be reviewed in line with the Newport Traffic Model.
6.14 Drainage
Comments have been received
from Southern Water who confirm they would not object to the scheme if the net
flow of drainage into the system is not increased above that of the sites
previous use. Although it is accepted that the hotel will have an increase
discharge, it has been suggested by Southern Water that if the surface water is
attenuated to ensure the net flow is controlled and in these circumstances they
would not object. Therefore it is proposed to place a condition on the
application if members were minded to approve ensuring that the net flow rate
is controlled and surface water is not released into the system unless there is
capacity to do so or an alternative disposal of surface water is put in place,
i.e. grey water system
6.15 Southern
Water have confirmed that they have agreed connection into the system and have
not objected to the proposal on the basis that an attenuation system will be
put in place. This has therefore been conditioned.
7. Justification for Recommendation
7.1 Having due regard and appropriate weight
to all material considerations referred to in this report, it is considered the
proposal has overcome the previous reasons for refusal. Representing a scheme
that makes good use of a Brownfield site, while providing much needed hotel
accommodation into the centre of Newport. The design respects the grain and
style of development making a positive contribution to the character of the
Conservation Area.
8. Recommendation
Conditional Permission.
Conditions
and Reasons:
1 |
The development hereby permitted
shall be begun before the expiration of 3 years from date of this permission. Reason: To comply with Section 91 of the Town and
Country Planning Act 1990. |
2 |
Notwithstanding the details on the
plans and application forms attached to and forming part of this decision
notice no development shall take place until sample of materials to be used
in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby
permitted and a schedule of all detailing including mortar colour has been
submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
Development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details and
retained as such thereafter. Reason: In the interests of the amenities of the
area and to comply with policy D1 (Standards of Design) of the IW Unitary
Development Plan. |
3 |
Development permitted by this
planning permission shall not be initiated by the undertaking of material
operations as defined in Section 56 (4) a-d of the Town and Country Planning
Act 1990 in relation to the development until planning obligations pursuant
to Section 106 of the said Act relating to the land has been made and lodged
with the Local Planning Authority and the Local Planning Authority has been
notified by the person submitting the same that it is to the Local Planning
Authority’s approval. The said Planning Obligation will make provision for
lighting and CCTV within Lugley Street Car Park. Reason: In the interest of
safety for these hotel residence using the car park during hours of darkness
in accordance with policy D11 (Crime and Design) of the IW Unitary
Development Plan. |
4 |
No development shall take place
until a detailed scheme (including calculations of capacity studies) for foul
and surface water drainage from the site have been submitted to and agreed
with the Local Planning Authority in writing. Any such agreed foul and
surface water disposal system shall indicate connections at points on the
system where adequate capacity exists to ensure any additional flow should
not cause flooding or over load the existing system, if necessary on
alternative system for the disposal of surface water shall be submitted to
and approved in writing by the LPA. Reason: To ensure an adequate
system of foul and surface water drainage is provided for the development
incompliance with Policy U11 (Infrastructure and Services Provision) of the
IW Unitary Development Plan. |
5 |
All construction traffic related
to the approved development shall deliver, load and un-load at set times and
locations, and to follow a set route, all of which are to be agreed in
writing with the Local Planning Authority prior to work commencing on site. Reason: In the interests of highway safety and to
comply with policies TR7 (Highway Considerations) of the IW Unitary Development
Plan. |
6 |
Details of any means of extraction
and filtration system to be used shall be submitted to and approved in
writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: To ensure any system
does not have a detrimental impact on the design of the building or amenities
of neighbouring properties in accordance with policy D1 (Standards of Design)
and P5 (Reducing the Impact of Noise) of the IW Unitary Development Plan. |
7 |
No building shall be occupied
until the means of access thereto for pedestrians has been constructed in
accordance with the approved plans. Reason: To ensure adequate safe
provision of facilities for pedestrians and cyclists wishing to gain access
to the site and to comply with policy TR6 (Cycling and Walking) of the IW
Unitary Development Plan. |
8 |
Before the development hereby
permitted is commenced, a scheme indicating the provision to be made for
disabled people to gain access to the building shall be submitted to and
approved by the Local Planning Authority in writing. The approved scheme shall be implemented
before the development hereby permitted is brought into use. Reason: To ensure adequate access for disabled
persons and to comply with policy D12 (Access for People with Disabilities)
of the IW Unitary Development Plan. |