MINUTES
OF A MEETING OF THE DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE HELD AT COUNTY HALL, NEWPORT,
ISLE OF WIGHT ON WEDNESDAY, 15 JUNE 2005 COMMENCING AT 5.06 PM
Present :
Mr A A Taylor (Chairman), Mr J R Adams, Mr I J Bulwer, Mr W R Burt
(deputising for Mrs S J Scoccia), Mr G W Cameron, Mr C B W Chapman,
Mr M J Cunningham, Miss H L Humby, Mrs M J Miller, Mr B Mosdell,
Lady Pigot, Mr I R Stephens (deputising for Mrs B E Foster),
Mr D R Whittaker, Mr J A M D Whittaker, Mr D G Williams
Apologies :
Mrs B E Foster, Mrs S J Scoccia
Also
Present (non-voting):
Mrs W C Arnold, Miss A Bishop, Mr C R Hancock, Mr J V Hobart,
Mr D J Knowles, Mr D J D Pugh
1.
MINUTES
RESOLVED :
THAT the Minutes of the
meeting held on 22
April 2005 be confirmed.
2.
ELECTION OF VICE CHAIRMAN
It was proposed and
seconded that Mrs M J Miller be elected as Vice Chairman of the Development
Control Committee. There were no
further nominations and following a vote by a show of hands it was :
RESOLVED :
THAT Mrs M J Miller be
elected Vice Chairman for the ensuing year.
3.
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Interests were
declared in the following matters:
Mr M J Cunningham
declared an interest in Minute 4 (a) item 2, The Boat Yard, Shepards Wharf,
Medina Road, Cowes, as he had a previous involvement with the public
consultation.
Mr M J
Cunningham declared a personal interest in Minute 4 (a) item 3, part of Readers
site, Place Road, Cowes, as he belonged to the same dining club as the
applicant and he knew the objector.
Mr J V Hobart
declared a personal interest in Minute 4 (a) item 3, part of Readers site,
Place Road, Cowes, as the applicant is an acquaintance.
Mrs M J Miller
declared a personal interest in Minute 4 (a) item 3, part of Readers site,
Place Road, Cowes, as the objector was known to her.
Mr A A Taylor
declared a personal interest in Minute 4 (a) item 3, part of Readers site,
Place Road, Cowes, as the objector was known to him.
Mr D R
Whittaker declared a personal and prejudicial interest in Minute 4 (a) item 3,
part of the readers site, Place Road, Cowes, as the applicant was personally
known to him as they were both involved with fund raising - he was not present
during the discussion and voting thereon.
Mr J A M D Whittaker declared a personal interest in Minute 4 (a) item 3, part
of Readers site, Place Road, Cowes, as the objector was known to him
Mr B Mosdell
declared a personal interest in Minute 4 (a) item 4, site of Teknacron Circuits
Ltd, Landguard Manor Road, Shanklin, as the applicant’s agent was known to him.
Mr I J Bulwer
declared a personal interest in Minute 4 (a) item 6, part of Trucast Ltd site,
Marlborough Road, Ryde, as he had been Managing Director of the firm until
1997.
Mr J R Adams
declared a personal interest in Minute 4 (a) item 10, Gladices Barn, Gladices
Lane, Chale Green, as the objector was known to him.
Mrs W C Arnold
declared a personal interest in Minute 4 (a) item 10, Gladices Barn, Gladices
Lane, Chale Green, as the person speaking on behalf of the Parish Council and
the applicants neighbour were known to her.
She was also the Council’s representative on the Area of Outstanding
Natural Beauty Advisory Committee.
Mr W R Burt
declared a personal and prejudicial interest in Minute 4 (a) item 10, Gladices
Barn, Gladices Lane, Chale Green, as he had previously given evidence against
the applicant – he was not present during the discussion and voting thereon.
Lady Pigot
declared a personal interest in Minute 4 (a) item 10, Gladices Barn, Gladices
Lane, Chale Green, as one of the objectors was known to her.
Mr D R
Whittaker declared a personal interest in Minute 4 (a) item 10, Gladices Barn,
Gladices Lane, Chale Green, as the objector was known to him.
Mr M J
Cunningham declared a personal interest in Minute 4 (a) item 11, land rear of
32 St Johns Road, Newport, as the applicants neighbour was a member of the same
golf club.
Miss H L Humby declared
a personal and prejudicial interest in Minute 4 (a) item 13, Alverstone House,
32 Luccombe Road, Shanklin, as the applicant was know to her, she had signed a
petition regarding the school and her nephew had attended the school - she was
not present during the discussion and voting thereon.
Mrs M J Miller
declared a personal interest in Minute 4 (a) item 13, Alverstone House, 32
Luccombe Road, Shanklin, as the applicant’s agent was known to her.
Mr D J D Pugh
declared a personal interest in Minute 4 (a) item 13, Alverstone House, 32
Luccombe Road, Shanklin, as the Headteacher and owners were known to members of
his family.
Mr A A Taylor
declared a personal interest in Minute 4 (a) item 13, Alverstone House, 32
Luccombe Road, Shanklin, as the applicant’s agent was known to him.
Mr D R
Whittaker declared a personal interest in Minute 4 (a) item 13, Alverstone
House, 32 Luccombe Road, Shanklin, as the objector was known to him.
Mr J A M D
Whittaker declared a personal interest in Minute 4 (a) item 13, Alverstone
House, 32 Luccombe Road, Shanklin, as the applicant’s agent was known to him.
Mr D J Williams
declared a personal interest in Minute 4 (a) item 13, Alverstone House, 32
Luccombe Road, Shanklin, as the objector was known to him.
Mr M J Cunningham
declared a personal interest in Minute 4 (a) item 15, land adjacent The Heights
Leisure Centre, Broadway, Sandown, as he had a previous involvement as a member
of the Resources Select Committee.
Mrs M J Miller
declared a personal interest in Minute 4 (a) item 15, land adjacent The Heights
Leisure Centre, Broadway, Sandown, as the person speaking on behalf of the Town
Council was known to her.
Mr A A Taylor
declared a personal interest in Minute 4 (a) item 15, land adjacent The Heights
Leisure Centre, Broadway, Sandown, as the person speaking on behalf of the Town
Council was known to him.
4.
REPORT OF THE HEAD OF PLANNING SERVICES
(a)
Planning Applications and Related Matters
Consideration
was given to items 1 - 15 of the report of the Head of Planning Services.
RESOLVED :
THAT the applications be determined as detailed below :
The reasons for the resolutions made in
accordance with Officer recommendation were given in the Planning report. Where resolutions are made contrary to
Officer recommendation the reasons for doing so are contained in the minutes.
A schedule of additional representations
received after the printing of the report were submitted at the beginning of
the meeting and were drawn to the attention of Members when considering the
application. A note is made to that
effect in the minutes.
Application: |
TCP/01236/D |
Details: |
Two/three storey building to provide 16 flats
(revised scheme) 29-34, Riboleau Street,
Ryde. |
Site Visit: |
The
site was visited by Members of the Development Control Committee on Monday,
13 June 2005. |
Public Participants: |
Mrs Joan Buckingham
(Objector) |
Additional
Representations: |
None. |
Comment: |
None. |
Decision: |
The
Committee had taken into consideration and agreed with the reasons for the
recommendation as set out under paragraph entitled Justification for
Recommendation of the report and resolved: Conditional planning approval,
subject to the conditions set out in the Part II Register |
Conditions: |
As per report (Item 1) |
Application: |
(Mr D R Whittaker
declared a personal and prejudicial interest in this item and left the room). TCP/02593/Z |
Details: |
Demolition
of section of building; outline for residential development (revised
description); alterations to vehicular access part
of Readers site, Place Road, Cowes. |
Site Visit: |
The site was visited by
Members of the Development Control Committee on Monday, 13 June 2005. |
Public Participants: |
Mr Paul Fuller (Objector) |
Additional Representations: |
The Environmental Health
Department was satisfied with the acoustic appraisal submitted. |
Comment: |
The Local Member spoke on
this application. |
Decision: |
The Committee had taken
into consideration and agreed with the reasons for the recommendation as set
out under paragraph entitled Justification for Recommendation of the report
and resolved: Conditional planning approval,
subject to the conditions set out in the Part II Register (subject
to conditions which includes a requirement to enter into a Section 106
Agreement and subject to referral procedures to the Government Office of the
South East on the grounds that the proposal is a departure from statutory
policies and subject to obtaining counsels advice regarding re-investment
certainty to ensure job preservation in the future). |
Conditions: |
Condition
11 be amended to read as follows : No
residential unit shall be occupied until the measures recommended in the
Applied Acoustic Design appraisal dated 17 May 2005, have been fully
implemented and such measure shall be retained and maintained thereafter. Reason: To prevent annoyance and disturbance, in
particular sleep disturbance, to the future occupiers of the development from
noise emissions from neighbouring industrial use in accordance with Policy P5
(Reducing Impact of Noise) of the Isle of Wight Unitary Development Plan. Consideration
be given to the provision of a pedestrian crossing. As per report (Item 3) |
Application: |
TCP/16570/J |
Details: |
Demolition of
industrial buildings; construction of single storey retail store with associated
storage and staff facilities; alterations to access; parking provision site
of Teknacron Circuits Ltd, Landguard Manor Road, Shanklin. |
Site Visit: |
None. |
Public Participants: |
Mr Phillip Warner
(Applicant) |
Additional Representations: |
Applicant’s agent asked
for Condition 7 to be amended. Two further letters of
support were received. |
Comment: |
The Local Member spoke on
this application. |
Decision: |
The Committee had taken into
consideration and agreed with the reasons for the recommendation as set out
under paragraph entitled Justification for Recommendation of the report and
resolved: Conditional planning
approval, subject to the conditions set out in the Part II Register (subject
to a Section 106 Agreement to secure highway improvements including the
provision of a pedestrian crossing). |
Conditions: |
Condition 7 to be amended
to enable exceptions to the prohibition of deliveries when there is a Bank
Holiday Monday after the weekend. As per report (Item 4) |
Application: |
TCP/16570/M |
Details: |
Residential
development of 38 houses and 15 flats with garages/parking; alterations to
vehicular access (revised scheme) (revised description - readvertised application)
(aorm) part of Teknacron
Circuits Ltd, Landguard Manor Road, Shanklin. |
Site Visit: |
None. |
Public Participants: |
None. |
Additional Representations: |
None. |
Comment: |
None. |
Decision: |
The Committee had taken into
consideration and agreed with the reasons for the recommendation as set out
under paragraph entitled Justification for Recommendation of the report and
resolved: Conditional planning approval, subject to the
conditions set out in the Part II Register |
Conditions: |
As per report (Item 5) |
Application: |
TCP/16796/W |
Details: |
Demolition
of building; residential development of 32 houses, 64 flats and 4 maisonettes
with associated garages, parking areas, landscaped open space and access roads
off Marlborough Road and off site works to Marlborough Road (aorm) part
of Trucast Ltd site, Marlborough Road, Ryde. |
Site Visit: |
The site was visited by
Members of the Development Control Committee on Monday, 13 June 2005. |
Public Participants: |
Mrs Phoenix Rhiannon
(Objector Mr Julian Jones
(Applicant) |
Additional Representations: |
A letter was received
from the applicants confirming their agreement to the additional Section 106
Agreement. As recommended in Condition 2. A copy of a letter
received by the MP for the Isle of Wight was received. |
Comment: |
The Local Member spoke on
this application. |
Decision: |
The Committee had taken
into consideration and agreed with the reasons for the recommendation as set out
under paragraph entitled Justification for Recommendation of the report and
resolved: Conditional planning
approval, subject to the conditions set out in the Part II Register (Revised
Plans) |
Conditions: |
Additional condition re
applicant installing a 2 metre high parallel close boarded fencing along the
adjacent western boundary. As per report (Item 6) |
Application: |
TCP/26385 |
Details: |
48
holiday homes with associated parking, garages and landscaping; associated 76
marina berths (revised scheme) (readvertised application) land
adjacent, Redshank Way, Newport. |
Site Visit: |
The site was visited by
Members of the Development Control Committee on Monday, 13 June 2005. |
Public Participants: |
Mr Jumbo Wood (Objector) Mr Bob Porter (Objector) Mr Edward Wright
(Objector) Mr Eric Sey (Agent) |
Additional Representations: |
Two letters from the
Environment Agency were received, firstly objecting to the development but
subsequently withdrawing their objection following the submission of a
satisfactory flood risk assessment. |
Comment: |
The Local Member spoke on
this application. |
Decision: |
The Committee had taken
into consideration and agreed with the reasons for the recommendation as set out
under paragraph entitled Justification for Recommendation of the report and
resolved: Conditional planning
approval, subject to the conditions set out in the Part II Register Subject
to a S106 Agreement to cover: ·
limiting occupation of dwelling to holiday use only. ·
provision of a register of occupants of all dwellings comprising both
this phase and the earlier planning permissions for the first 48 dwellings. ·
provision of a register of all individual berths and the
owner/occupier/user of those berths, and whether they are resident or
occupiers on site. ·
maintaining each and every holiday unit with a dedicated marina berth,
the berth to be provided and operational prior to the occupation of its
holiday unit.
|
Conditions: |
Additional conditions regarding surface water
drainage, the implementation of an ecological survey and preparation of a
conservation plan which could form part of the Section 106 Agreement. Conditions to be added
with reference to no moorings on the wharf until the buildings have been
completed. As per report (Item 8) |
Application: |
(Mr W R Burt declared a personal and prejudicial
interest in this item and left the room). TCP/16761/C |
Details: |
Conversion of redundant
barn to unit of holiday accommodation with terrace on south west elevation;
alterations to vehicular access (revised plans) Gladices
Barn, Gladices Lane, Chale Green, Ventnor. |
Site Visit: |
The site was visited by
Members of the Development Control Committee on Monday, 13 June 2005. |
Public Participants: |
Mr Malcolm Groves
(Objector) Councillor Mrs S Stark (Town
Council) Mr Michael O’Keefe
(Applicant) |
Additional Representations: |
A further communication
from Chale Parish Council was received. Two additional letters
were received |
Comment: |
The Local Member spoke on
this application. |
Decision: |
The Committee had taken
into consideration and agreed with the reasons for the recommendation as set
out under paragraph entitled Justification for Recommendation of the report
and resolved: Deferred for further information
on a whole farm plan, a statement on why the building cannot be adapted to
correct farming needs, light pollution in the night sky, Policies T 9 and C
17 of the Isle of Wight Unitary Development Plan. |
Conditions: |
As per report (Item 10) |
Application: |
TCP/26419/A |
Details: |
Pair
of semi-detached houses (revised scheme) land
rear of 32, St. Johns Road, Newport. |
Site Visit: |
The site was visited by
Members of the Development Control Committee on Monday, 13 June 2005. |
Public Participants: |
Mr Terry Phillips
(Objector) Mrs S Norman (Objector) Miss Claire Taylor
(Applicant) |
Additional Representations: |
None. |
Comment: |
The Local Member spoke on
this application. |
Decision: |
The Committee had taken into
consideration and agreed with the reasons for the recommendation as set out
under paragraph entitled Justification for Recommendation of the report and
resolved: Conditional planning
approval, subject to the conditions set out in the Part II Register |
Conditions: |
As per report (Item 11) |
Application: |
(Miss H L Humby declared
a personal and prejudicial interest in this item and left the room). TCP/11878/E |
Details: |
Continued
use of dwelling as private school; vehicular access and parking Alverstone
House, 32, Luccombe Road, Shanklin. |
Site Visit: |
The site was visited by
Members of the Development Control Committee on Monday, 13 June 2005. |
Public Participants: |
Mr Ian Thomas (Objector) Mr Glen Hepburn (Agent) Mr Gordon Read
(Supporter) |
Additional Representations: |
The Chairman received a
1,118 signature petition. A statement that had been
received from the school during the meeting was read out. 19 additional letters of
support were received. |
Comment: |
The Local Member spoke on
this application. The Member from the
adjoining ward spoke on this item. |
Decision: |
The Committee had taken into
consideration and agreed with the reasons for the recommendation as set out
under paragraph entitled Justification for Recommendation of the report and
resolved: Deferred for further
information on the school’s green travel plan, a level survey and clarification
with reference to some of the trees on the site. |
Conditions: |
As per report (Item 13) |
Application: |
TCP/21488/G |
Details: |
Erection
of single/2 storey building to form GP's surgery, pharmacy and primary care trust
office base, with associated parking (revised scheme) (readvertised application) land
adjacent The Heights Leisure Centre, Broadway, Sandown. |
Site Visit: |
The site was visited by
Members of the Development Control Committee on Monday, 13 June 2005. |
Public Participants: |
Mrs Valerie Taylor (Town
Council) Mr Jonathan Green
(Applicant) Dr Peter Randall
(Supporter) |
Additional Representations: |
13 letters of support and
a 253 signature petition had been received. |
Comment: |
The officers report had
been written on the basis of drawings received and discussed on 18 May 2005,
but on the 6 June 2005 a different drawing was submitted which had not
previously been seen by the Planning Department and showed a building of
greater visual impact. Members expressed extreme
concern with regard to the impact, siting and height of the building and that
a decision was needed that day if the funding for the survey was not to be
lost. |
Decision: |
The Committee had taken into
consideration and agreed with the reasons for the recommendation as set out
under paragraph entitled Justification for Recommendation of the report and
resolved: Conditional planning
approval, subject to the conditions set out in the Part II Register (subject to no further
comments being received by 17 June 2005 which would warrant further
consideration by the Committee). |
Conditions: |
As per report (Item 15) |
The
meeting then adjourned and reconvened at County Hall, Newport, Isle of Wight on
Wednesday, 29 June 2005 at 5.00 pm when there were present :
Mr A A Taylor (Chairman), Mr I J Bulwer, Mr W R Burt (deputising for
Mr D R Whittaker), Mr G W Cameron, Mr C B W Chapman,
Mr M J Cunningham, Mrs B E Foster, Miss H L Humby, Mrs M J
Miller, Mr B Mosdell, Lady Pigot, Mrs S J Scoccia, Mr I R
Stephens (deputising for Mr J R Adams)
Apologies :
Mr J R Adams,
Mr D R Whittaker
Also
Present (non-voting):
Mr G H Brown, Mrs L J Peacey-Wilcox, Mr R G
Mazillius
5.
REPORT OF THE HEAD OF
PLANNING SERVICES
Application: |
TCP/09178/N |
|
Details: |
Demolition
of building (block 2); construction of 2 single storey buildings to provide 10
light industrial units (use classes B1 and B8), (revised scheme) Northwood
Business Park, 290, Newport Road, Cowes. |
|
Site
Visit: |
The site was visited by
Members of the Development Control Sub Committee on Monday, 13 June 2005. |
|
Public
Participants: |
None. |
|
Additional
Representations: |
A letter from the
applicant was received. |
|
Comment: |
The Local Member spoke on
this application. |
|
Decision: |
The application was approved,
subject to conditions, and contrary to officer’s recommendation as members
believed there was a demand for small inexpensive lock-up units suitable for
small business start ups. The
proposed units were unobtrusive and replacements for the existing
buildings. Employment was the main
consideration. In compliance with the
Councils Constitution a named vote was taken as the application was contrary
to Officer recommendation : The voting was as follows
: For (8) Councillors Burt, Cameron,
Chapman, Foster, Humby, Pigot, Stephens, Taylor. Against (4) Councillors Bulwer, Cunningham, Mosdell, Scoccia. Abstentions (1) Councillor Miller |
|
Conditions: |
Conditions to include : No outside storage, no outside working, no
working with the doors of the unit open, a restriction on time use, no
amalgamation of the units, ensure units are only used for storage and starter
units. As per report (Item 9) |
|
Application: |
TCP/01523/N |
|
Details: |
Four/five/six
storey development comprising 48 flats; two retail units (Class A1), one
retail/bistro unit (Class A1/A3); formation of vehicular access and parking
provision (aorm) The
Boat Yard, Shepards Wharf, Medina Road, Cowes. |
|
Site
Visit: |
None. |
|
Public
Participants: |
None |
|
Additional
Representations: |
Additional detailed
information in respect of the flood escape route was provided and
confirmation that the Environment Agency were satisfied that the development
could now be classed as defended to the appropriate standard ensuring
pedestrians could escape in dry conditions to the emergency vehicle access
points. |
|
Comment: |
The Local Member spoke on
this application. The Member from the
adjoining ward spoke on this item. |
|
Decision: |
That the application be
deferred for further negotiation on design and height. Members believed the development should be
higher on the waterfront side and lower on Medina Road. |
|
Conditions: |
As per report (Item 2) |
|
Application: |
TCP/22370/C |
|
Details: |
Demolition
of factory buildings; residential
development of 58 houses and 3 storey block of 8 flats with parking/garages
and associated access roads, (aorm) (revised plans) east
of Winston Close/north of Grange Avenue existing industrial site south of,
Sherbourne Avenue, Ryde. |
|
Site
Visit: |
None. |
|
Public
Participants: |
None. |
|
Additional
Representations: |
A letter was received
from a representative of the Sherbourne Area Association. |
|
Comment: |
None. |
|
Decision: |
The Committee had taken
into consideration and agreed with the reasons for the recommendation as set
out under paragraph entitled Justification for Recommendation of the report
and resolved: Conditional planning
approval, subject to the conditions set out in the Part II Register (Revised
Plans) |
|
Conditions: |
Condition to be added as
follows : Plots 23 – 26 shall not
be occupied until emergency access has been constructed and surfaced in accordance
with details to be agreed by the Local Planning Authority. Such access shall have a minimum width of
4 metres and shall be constructed through to a gated entrance on the northern
boundary. Such emergency access shall
be retained and maintained thereafter. Reason : In the interests of providing
access for emergency vehicles to the adjoining Mayfield C of E Middle School
in compliance with Policy TR7 (highway Considerations) of the Isle of Wight
Unitary Development Plan. As per report (Item 7) |
|
Application: |
(During the meeting
Councillor Humby declared a personal interest as a member of the Youth and
Community Centre) TCP/17609/C |
|
Details: |
Alterations
and change of use of old fire stations appliance bay to form an educational workshop
facility Sandown
Youth and Community Centre, Town Hall, Grafton Street, Sandown. |
|
Site
Visit: |
None. |
|
Public
Participants: |
None. |
|
Additional
Representations: |
Comments had been received
from the Environmental Health Officer concerning the potential for
disturbance to be caused to residents |
|
Comment: |
An application for Listed
Building Consent had recently been submitted (LBC/17609/D). |
|
Decision: |
The Committee had taken into
consideration and agreed with the reasons for the recommendation as set out
under paragraph entitled Justification for Recommendation of the report and
resolved: Conditional planning approval, subject to the
conditions set out in the Part II Register A covering letter is to
be sent with the Decision Notice indicating that no alterations should be
carried out to the Listed Building until such time as Listed Building Consent
has been granted for the works. A decision on LBC/17609/D
be delegated to officer’s. |
|
Conditions: |
As per report (Item 12) |
|
Application: |
TCP/16952/C |
|
Details: |
Alterations
to restore semi-detached house split into flats back into a single dwelling
with room to accommodate elderly relative, (revised scheme) 30
John Street, Ryde. |
|
Site
Visit: |
None. |
|
Public
Participants: |
None. |
|
Additional
Representations: |
None. |
|
Comment: |
None. |
|
Decision: |
The application was
approved, subject to conditions, and contrary to officer’s recommendation as members
believed a home was being provided for the care of an elderly relative and
the property had originally been a single dwelling. In compliance with the
Councils Constitution a named vote was taken as the application was contrary
to Officer recommendation : The voting was as follows
: For (10) Councillors Bulwer, Burt, Cameron, Chapman,
Cunningham, Humby, Mosdell, Pigot, Scoccia, Stephens, Taylor. Against (1) Councillors Miller Abstentions
(1) Councillor Foster |
|
Conditions: |
Condition to be added re time limit. As per report (Item 14) |
|
(a)
Planning Appeal Statistics
The Committee were given an
update of all the appeal decisions that had been received during 2004/05. The Island had a good overall planning base
that was being supported by the Planning Inspectorate on Appeal with a higher
proportion of Appeals being dismissed than the national average.
Appeals had previously been
reported to the Committee on a three weekly basis but were now published weekly
in the Isle of Wight County Press. That
being the case Members believed there was no longer a need for Appeals to be
reported to every meeting, although Local Member notification would remain
unchanged.
RESOLVED :
THAT
the report be noted.
(b)
Schedule of Outstanding Section 106 Obligations
Members
were made aware of the schedule of currently outstanding Section 106
obligations for the last four months.
It was proposed that in future the schedule be brought to the Committee
on a quarterly basis.
It was
proposed to impose a requirement on applicants to conclude a Section 106
Agreement within a specified time period, likely to be three months, for all
but the most complicated or the application would be reverted back for
determination on the basis of unwillingness to enter into one.
RESOLVED :
THAT a time limit of three months to
conclude a Section 106 Agreement, from the first draft, be imposed.
CHAIRMAN