PAPER G1

 

Committee :         CO-ORDINATING COMMITTEE

 

Date :                   15 NOVEMBER 2002

 

Title :                    AN EVEN NEWER WAY OF SELECT COMMITTEE WORKING!!

 

                             REPORT BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE FIRE AND PUBLIC SAFETY SELECT COMMITTEE

 


REASON FOR COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION

 

Since the abandonment of the old service committee style of local government, the council decision-making process has been made clearer and easier.  Delegated power to the Executive and officers, in my opinion, has undoubtedly assisted in this but the current structure, whilst it is now beginning to deliver some constructive and exciting changes in policy, is only beginning to scratch the surface of scrutiny in one Select Committee (Resources) and this is constrained by the time put in by individual members and the physical duration of the meeting. The Select Committees by and large (including my own) are failing to deliver effective scrutiny of delegated Executive and officer decisions across the Authority.  This situation can be improved and must be addressed before the Select Committees fall into the comfortable trap of becoming service committees again.  This is a likely scenario even though new Chairmen have been appointed to these Committees as the Committees are made up of a large proportion of longer standing Members who are comfortable with the way things were.

 

Following my visit to The University of Birmingham Institute of Local Government Studies, a course entitled Successful Scrutiny, and a fact-finding visit to the House of Commons, I have formed the opinion that the current system is better than the old service committee style but is still not challenging enough.

 

I believe the effectiveness of scrutiny can be developed further by reducing the burden and volume of work on all Select Committee Members and the formation of a separate scrutiny committee that has the dedicated resources and support to tackle cross-cutting issues and dig deeper into the organisation on behalf of the public.

 

SPECIFIC DISCUSSION TOPICS FOR THE CO-ORDINATING COMMITTEE:

 

                      To reduce the number of Select Committee Members from twelve to eight.

 

                      To establish an additional politically proportional scrutiny committee dedicated and resourced to undertake challenging and rigorous cross-cutting scrutiny.

 

                      To continue the existing select committee system focussing on scrutiny and review of policy.

 

                      To consider offering the Chair of Scrutiny to the Opposition parties.

 

                      To consider a mock up scheme to evaluate the effectiveness of this proposal and report the findings back to this committee

BACKGROUND

 

The current select committee system was designed and implemented in 1999. An Executive Committee comprising nine members and the Leader of the Council and six Select


Committees were created.  This differed from the old service committee structure where six service committees reported directly to the Full Council and were delegated items directly from it for return after attention to detail.

 

The Executive has been awarded delegated powers of decision and the Select Committees are charged with the remit of scrutiny of those decisions and review of policy leaving Full Council with overall responsibility for dealing with Constitutional policy and budgetary issues.

 

The system has been subject to minor adjustments with regard to number of Executive posts, post names and responsibilities but in general has not been subject of major review.

 

RELEVANT PLANS, POLICIES, STRATEGIES AND PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

 

In line with the Council’s constitution this report must be considered by the Council’s Co-ordinating Committee that is made up by each of the Council’s Select Committee Chairmen, or in the relevant Chairman’s absence, the Vice Chairman of that Select Committee and three other Members to ensure political proportionality.

 

There are no relevant performance indicators.

 

CONSULTATION PROCESS

 

The introduction of this paper is part of the local and political consultation process.

 

FINANCIAL, LEGAL, CRIME AND DISORDER IMPLICATIONS

 

Effective scrutiny if achieved will have significant secondary financial, legal and crime and disorder implications.  Agreement to some of the recommendations will result in a change to the Council’ Constitution.

 

APPENDICES ATTACHED

 

None.

 

OPTIONS

 

1.      To consider a mock up scheme to evaluate the effectiveness of this proposal and report the findings back to this committee

2.      To take no action

 

BACKGROUND PAPERS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS REPORT

 

District audit letters

A hard nut to crack – making scrutiny work 2001.  Stephanie Snape and Francis Taylor

The Development of Overview and Scrutiny in Local Government 2002. (Snape, Leach and Copus) A report for the ODPM

 

 

Contact Point :     Councillor Garry Price ,  532000, mobile 07970 202820

e-mail [email protected]

 

 

 

                                                                                  GARRY PRICE

                                                                  Chairman of Fire and Public Safety