PAPER G
Committee: AUDIT AND PERFORMANCE
Date: 29 MAY 2007
Title: NEWPORT
HARBOUR – HARBOUR DUES
REPORT OF THE CABINET MEMBER FOR ENVIRONMENT AND TRANSPORT
SUMMARY
1.
The report provides the Audit and Performance Committee with
further information regarding Harbour Dues collected at Newport Harbour.
ACTION REQUIRED
2.
None
CONFIDENTIAL ITEMS
3.
None
BACKGROUND – NEWPORT HARBOUR
4.
At the meeting of the Audit and Performance Committee on 14
November 2006 a request was made for additional information on Harbour Dues
collected at Newport Harbour.
5.
Newport Harbour derives over 99% of its income from Harbour
Charges and rent from the harbour estate, not Harbour Dues. Harbour charges are
set out in the Harbour Charges and Conditions Booklet, and are reviewed
annually in line with inflation. Property rent is set by Property Services.
6.
Harbour Dues represent less than 1% of income to the
harbour. Harbour Dues are effectively a fee for passing through the harbour,
but must be reasonable and relate to the expenditure incurred by the harbour
authority.
7.
The current basis for Harbour Dues was set by the
Environment and Technical Services Committee on 7 February 2000, and was
determined on the valuation advice of the Property Services Manager. Extracts
from that report are set out in 1.4 below, the full report sets out the
background to the collection of Harbour Dues.
8.
The Newport Harbour Master, on behalf of the competent
harbour authority the Isle of Wight Council, collects harbour dues in respect
of the area of the River Medina extending from Newport Harbour down to the
Folly Inn. Harbour dues were first charged in the 19th century, and these
powers were more recently consolidated under the Harbours Act 1964 Section 26
and Section 27, and with subsequent Orders, the most recent being the Newport
(Isle of Wight) Harbour Revision Order 1988 Section 14.
9.
To summarise, these powers enable the harbour authority:
(a)
to improve, regulate, maintain, manage, mark or light the
harbour of Newport (Isle of Wight) as defined in the Order;
(b)
to control the moorings and keeping of house boats as
defined in the Order;
(c)
to dispose of wrecks and to deal with unserviceable
vessels;
(d)
to make certain charges;
(e)
to make byelaws.
10.
In respect of (d) these charges must be reasonable, and
must relate to the expenditure involved by the Harbour Authority in exercising
its powers listed above.
11.
The harbour dues collected in 2006/07 were:
Odessa
Marine £763 This
figure reflects 5% of the income that Odessa Marine collect for mooring fees.
Island
Harbour
£257.50 This figure is based on the Property Services Manager’s recommendation
in 2000. “At Island Harbour, the mooring facilities which are linked to
properties and which do not pay permanent mooring fees will pay Harbour Dues of
£20 for each boat which approximates to about 1% of a notional income for a
permanent mooring.” In light of property development at Island harbour it may
be appropriate that this estimate needs revising by the Property Services
Manager.
Medina
Valley Centre £117 This figure reflects the fact that the Medina Valley
Centre lay their own 3 moorings and are charged half the mooring rate at the
Folly.
STRATEGIC CONTEXT
12.
Newport Harbour is one of the three Council owned and
operated harbours.
FINANCIAL
IMPLICATIONS
13.
Income to Newport Harbour in 2006-07 was £136,492. As can
be seen above only £1138 came from Harbour Dues and this represents less than
1% of the overall harbour income. The modest income derived from harbour dues
relates to the low revenue expenditure on items 1.4 (a) to (e), but does
include a contribution to the maintenance of navigation lights and channel
buoys, but in any event the harbour authority has a duty to maintain such aids
to navigation.
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS
14.
The Council is the statutory harbour authority for Newport
Harbour.
15.
The Newport (Isle of Wight) Harbour Acts and Order 1852 to
1988 empower the Isle of Wight Council to charge and collect Harbour
Dues. The level of Dues is for the Isle of Wight Council to set, in
accordance with any requirements as set out in the said Acts or Orders.
EVALUATIONS
16.
Newport Harbour has greatly improved over recent years as
its role has changed from freight handling to become a leisure facility. Whilst the environment has improved the
level of income has declined as buildings which previously contributed to the
revenue account have turned to alternative uses.
17.
The Harbour needs significant investment if it is to
maximise its potential and this is being explored as part of the regeneration
of the Medina Valley and a review of regeneration opportunities in this part of
Newport. The repairs to the harbour walls and capital dredging are being
explored as part of a larger scheme which will look to add value to the
development opportunities by creating deeper water.
RISK MANAGEMENT
18.
There are no significant risks attached to the issue of
Harbour Dues.
RECOMMENDATION
19.
To note the report
APPENDICES ATTACHED
20.
None
BACKGROUND PAPERS
21.
“River Medina Harbour Dues” – Report of the Director of
Environment Services to the Environment and Technical Services Committee 7
February 2000.
Contact Details: Dr Robin McInnes OBE, Coastal Manager, ( 857220
email [email protected]
STUART
LOVE Director
of Environment and Neighbourhoods |
COUNCILLOR
TIM HUNTER-HENDERSON Cabinet
Member for Environment and Transport |